The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using panoramic 250 slide scanner

1

Immunohistochemical and Immunofluorescence Analyses of FFPE Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunohistochemistry analyses, samples were fixed overnight in 4% formalin solution and embedded in paraffin. In brief, 3-µm-thick sections of FFPE tumors were deparaffinized and antigen retrieval was performed by boiling the sections in citrate buffer at pH 6.0 or EDTA at pH 9.0 for 20 min. Primary antibodies used were as follows: Dclk1 (1:50; pH 6.0; Abcam), Sox9 (1:50; pH 6.0; Millipore), Ki67 (1:50; pH 6.0; Cell Marque), corresponding secondary antibody detection kits for reduced background on murine tissue were used (Histofine Simple Stain Mouse MAX PO; Medac) and stained on an automated stainer (LabVision Autostainer 480S; Thermo Fisher Scientific). All slides were scanned with a Panoramic 250 slide scanner (3D Histech.com).
For immunofluorescence, frozen sections were incubated in the target retrieval solution (Dako) for 7 min. Primary antibodies are listed in the Cell lines and reagents section. Slides were analyzed using a sp5 confocal microscope (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microscopy Imaging and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histochemical and fluorescence staining were visualized using an Axio-Imager A1 microscope or an Axioskop 2 fluorescence microscope (both from Carl Zeiss, Inc, Oberkochen, Germany) and the corresponding Axiovision software (Carl Zeiss, Inc). Image acquisition was performed either with an Axiocam HRc camera (Carl Zeiss, Inc) connected to the microscope or with a Panoramic 250 slide scanner (3DHISTECH, Budapest, Hungary). Quantifications were performed using either the Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012 (link)) or the Cellprofiler (Carpenter et al., 2006 (link)) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Detection of Neurodegeneration Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections were fixed for 15 min at 4 °C with 4% formaldehyde (Sigma, 252549) and washed three times 5 min with 1× PBS (Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline, Sigma D1408) at room temperature (RT). Next, sections were blocked and permeabilized in blocking buffer (PBS, 10% NGS, 0.25% Triton X-100) for 1 h at RT and incubated overnight at 4 °C with an antibody specific for phosphoserine 129 α-syn (α-syn-pS129, 1:500, Abcam 51253), or the conformation-dependent anti-Tau antibody (MC1, 1:200), or anti-pTDP-43 pS409/410 (Biolegend, 829901, 1:500), or an antibody against MAO-B (Thermofisher, PA5-28338, 1:500). The following day, sections were washed three times 5 min with 1× PBS before incubation with a secondary, AlexaFluor647-labeled goat-anti-rabbit antibody (Abcam, ab150079, 1:500) or goat-anti-mouse antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, 115-605-166, 1:500) or AlexaFluor633-labeled goat-anti-rat antibody (Invitrogen, A-21094, 1:500). Following incubation with secondary antibody the sections were washed three times in PBS. For image acquisition, sections were mounted using ProLong Gold Antifade reagent (Invitrogen P36930) and imaged on a Panoramic250 Slide Scanner (3DHistech) with a ×20 objective.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Histological Analysis of Wound Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For histological analysis of the excised wounds and normal skin, the tissue was fixed overnight in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS or in 95% ethanol / 1% acetic acid, followed by paraffin embedding. Paraffin sections (7μm) from the middle of the wounds were stained using the Herovici procedure [15 (link)]. Sections from normal skin were stained with hematoxylin/eosin (H/E). Stained sections were photographed using a Zeiss Axioskop 2 microscope with an Axiocam HRc camera or with the Panoramic 250 Slide Scanner (3D Histech, Budapest, Hungary), and histomorphometrical measurements were quantified using FIJI software [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Histological Wound Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following euthanasia of the mice, wounds were excised and either fixed with ethanol/acetic acid 95:1 v/v overnight followed by paraffin embedding or frozen in tissue‐freezing medium (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Paraffin‐embedded wound sections (7 µm) from the middle of the wound were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and imaged with a Panoramic 250 Slide Scanner (3D Histech, Budapest, Hungary).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For IHC analyses, samples were fixed overnight in 4% formalin solution and embedded in paraffin. Briefly, 3-µm-thick sections of FFPE tumors were deparaffinized and antigen retrieval was performed by boiling the sections in citrate buffer at pH 6.0 or EDTA at pH 9.0 for 20 min. Primary antibodies used were as follows: monoclonal anti-Elp3 (Cell Signaling Technology), polyclonal anti-Dek (Bethyl Laboratories), and monoclonal anti-Ctu1 and anti-Ctu2 (Abcam). Corresponding secondary antibody detection kits for reduced background on murine tissue were used (Histofine Simple Stain Mouse MAX PO; Medac) and stained on an automated stainer (LabVision Autostainer 480S; Thermo Fisher Scientific). All slides were scanned with a Panoramic 250 slide scanner (3DHISTECH Ltd.).
For quantification of IHC signals, total H-DAB–positive areas of each slide were calculated using the ImageJ software. Specifically, H-DAB positivity was quantified from the transformed images by ImageJ IHC Toolbox. Measurements were calculated in pixels. Data are expressed as percentage of H-DAB–positive pixels on total corresponding tissue structure pixels per slide.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Histological Analysis of Liver Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Liver tissue samples were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 24 h, and then embedded in paraffin blocks and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed according to a standard procedure. Brown staining was considered as a positive result. Images were captured using a Panoramic 250 slide scanner (3DHistech Ltd).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative Ki67 Immunohistochemistry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue sections were blocked with avidin/biotin block for 8 min, followed by incubation with Ki67 antibody (Abeam) for 5 h, followed by 1 h incubation with biotinylated goat anti-rabbit IgG (Vector Laboratories) at a dilution of 1:200. The detection was performed with DAB detection kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions, followed by counterstaining with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and cover-slipped and sealed with Permount (Fisher Scientific). Slides were imaged on a Panoramic 250 slide scanner (3DHISTECH) at 40× resolution. The threshold was adjusted to exclude background and the stained area was quantified using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Confocal Imaging and Histological Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Confocal images were acquired using 3i spinning disk confocal microscope with a 63X Oil objective. Images were processed (background subtraction, contrast and brightness adjustment) with Fiji ImageJ 1.50b. Images for histological analysis were acquired using Leica DMRBE microscope (Carl Zeiss AG) or Panoramic 250 slide scanner (3DHISTECH Ltd) with a 40X objective. Image analysis/ seminiferous tubule counting was carried out using Fiji ImageJ cell counter. The percentage of tubules containing specific cell types were calculated and plotted with GraphPad Prism 5.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!