The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Orbitrap xl mass spectrometer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer is a high-resolution mass analyzer that utilizes an Orbitrap mass analyzer. It is capable of accurate mass measurements and high-resolution analysis of a wide range of analytes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using orbitrap xl mass spectrometer

1

Sperm Proteins Identification by Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In-gel digestion and LC–MS/MS analysis were performed in accordance with the work of Fu et al.63 (link). Sperm basic proteins extracted from sperm nuclei of S. horneri were separated by SDS-PAGE (14% polyacrylamide gel). Gels were stained using CBB staining solution (SP-4010; Integrale, Tokushima, Japan). Four bands around 25 kDa (Fig. 4) were cut using a razor blade. The excised bands were digested with trypsin. The tryptic digests were separated by Paradigm MS2 HPLC (Bruker-Michrom, Auburn, CA, USA) equipped with an HTS-PAL auto-sample injection system (LEAP, Carrboro, NC, USA) on a nanocapillary column (0.1 mm inner diameter × 50 mm; Chemicals Evaluation and Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan). The eluates from the column were subsequently subjected to mass spectral analysis using an Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). MS/MS spectral data were analyzed using Thermo Proteome Discoverer version 1.4.0.208 with the Mascot search engine (Matrix Science, London, UK), using transcriptomic data of S. horneri35 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Nano LC-ESI-MS/MS Protein Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein identification was performed using nano LC-ESI-MS/MS. The MS system consisted of an Agilent 1100 nanoLC system (Agilent), PicoTip electrospray emitter (New Objective) and an Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo-Fisher). Protein spots from the membranes were in-gel digested by trypsin (Promega) (with and without citraconic anhydride treatment) and applied to nanoLC-ESI-MS/MS. Peptides were trapped and desalted on the enrichment column (Zorbax SB C18; 0.3x5 mm; Agilent) for five minutes using 2.5% acetonitrile/0.5% formic acid as eluent, then peptides were separated on a Zorbax 300 SB C18 column (75µmx150mm; Agilent) using an acetonitrile/0.1% formic acid gradient from 5 to 35% acetonitril within 40 minutes. MS/MS spectra were recorded data-dependently by the mass spectrometer, according to manufacturer's recommendations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Purification and Analysis of ADP-Ribosylated Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Products of ADP-ribosylation reactions containing 10 μg of protein were purified using standard TCA precipitation and resuspended in PBA buffer (100 mM HEPES pH 8.5, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2). If required, cysteines were reduced in 10 mM dithiotreitol for 30 min at room temperature and alkylated with 10 mM iodoacetamide for 30 min at room temperature in the dark. Proteins were digested with 100 ng trypsin (Promega) overnight at 37 °C and peptides bound to m-aminophenylboronic acid agarose beads (Sigma) for 1 h at 4 °C. The beads were washed extensively with PBA buffer and the ADP-ribosylated peptides eluted with 1 M hydroxylamine (Sigma) pH 7.0 overnight at room temperature. Eluates were purified using C18 ZipTips (Millipore) according to manufacturer instructions and analysed by nano-LC-MS (ThermoFisher U3000 nanoLC and Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer)39 (link). The raw mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectra were converted to.mgf format using Compass39 (link) and searched against the SwissProt database using Mascot (Matrix Science). Search parameters employed a precursor tolerance of 7 p.p.m. and a fragment ion tolerance of 0.8 Da. Quantification of precursor ions employed Skyline40 (link). ADP-ribosylation sites were identified based on a characteristic +15.0109 Da shift on glutamate and aspartate residues41 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Profiling GalNAc-O-Bn Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
0.5×106 HL60 cells were cultured in serum-free, phenol red-free Advance Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (ADMEM) along with 80μM Ac5GalNTGc or vehicle control for 16h.100μM peracetylated GalNAc-O-Bn available from a previous study was then added to the cells (Wang et al., 2018 (link)). After 48h, GalNAc-O-Bn related products were purified from cell culture medium using Sep-Pak C18 cartridges (Waters, Milford, MA), permethylated and analyzed using ESI (electrospray ionization) LC-MS/MS (Orbitrap-XL mass spectrometer, Thermo). Instrument MS1 tolerance was 15ppm and MS/MS data were obtained following collision induced dissociation (30eV) at 1Da resolution using the ion-trap detector. All spectra are annotated using DrawGlycan-SNFG (Cheng et al., 2017 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Proteomic Analysis of Parasitic Nematode

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HES was separated into 1 ml fractions by size exclusion chromatography using a Superdex 200 10/300 GL column, or by anion exchange chromatography using a MonoQ 5/50 GL column (GE Healthcare) in a 40 column volume gradient from 20 mM TrisHCl pH 8 (start buffer) to a maximum of 30% 20 mM TrisHCl + 1 M NaCl pH 8 (elution buffer). All fractions were trypsinized and analyzed by LC MS/MS on an on-line system consisting of a capillary-pump Agilent 1200 HPLC system (Agilent, UK) coupled to an Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) as previously described (Hewitson et al., 2011 (link), Hewitson et al., 2013 (link)). LC MS/MS data was analyzed using Mascot (v2.4, Matrix Science) and searched against an improved in-house BLASTx annotated database obtained by 454 sequencing of H. polygyrus adults, with additional full length H. polygyrus sequences from NCBI, WormBase ParaSite (Howe et al., 2016 (link)) and our own Sanger sequencing (Harcus Y. et al, manuscript in preparation). Peptides identified were ranked by Mascot protein score, with a minimum cutoff score of 20, with a significance threshold of p<0.05. Protein abundance was estimated by emPAI (exponentially modified protein abundance index).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Pd-Mediated Transformations of Peptides

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ProPTX (100 μM) or A and B (100 μM, each) were dissolved in
a PBS solution (200 μL) with metallopeptide 2-Pd (Pd concentration of 6 μM), respectively. The mixtures were
shaken at 1200 rpm and 37 °C in a Thermomixer for 24 h. Samples
were desalted by StageTips and analyzed by LCMS (Agilent 1200) using
an Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher, Ion source ESI). PTX, ProPTX, LNF, A, and B (100 μM, each) in PBS were used as analytical
controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Peptide Mapping of Biosimilar Candidates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MYL-1501D and reference product samples were digested with glutamyl endoproteinase Glu-C (Cat No: 11047817001, Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Disulfide bonds were reduced by incubating for an additional hour in 1 M of DTT (Cat No: RO861, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA). DTT-treated samples were used in reduced peptide mapping, whereas the non-reduced samples provided information on disulfide mapping. Individual peptide fragments were identified using LC-MS. Detection was performed using UV radiation at 215 nm; the Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (ThermoFisher Scientific) was set to a resolution of 30,000, with a capillary voltage of +5.5 kV, tube lens of 100 V, collision energy of 35 V, mass range of m/z 100 to 2000 Da (for MS and MS/MS), and source temperature of 330°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nano-LC-MS/MS Proteomic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were diluted in 0.1% formic acid. Nano-LC separation was done with a nano-liquid chromatography system (EASY-nLC 1000, Thermo Scientific, USA). 2.5 µg of peptide samples were loaded onto a trap column (PepMap100 C18, 75 µm × 2 cm, 3 µm particles, Thermo Scientific) and separated at a flow rate of 200 nl/min by an analytical reversed phase column (PepMap RSLC C18, 75 µm × 50 cm, 2 µm particles, Thermo Scientific) using a 260 min gradient from 5% B to 25% B (solvent A: 0.1% formic acid; solvent B: CH3CN/0.1% formic acid) followed by a 60 min gradient from 25% to 50% B. Tandem mass spectrometry was performed with an Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, USA). MS and MS/MS spectra were acquired using cycles of one MS scan (mass range m/z 300–2000) and five subsequent data dependent CID MS/MS scans (dynamic exclusion activated; collision energy: 35%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Phosphoproteome Analysis of Primary MEFs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were processed as described60 (link), with the following modifications. Primary MEFs were lysed 48 or 96 h after 4-OHT treatment in 1 ml of urea buffer per 15 cm tissue culture dish. Reduction and alkylation of cysteines was performed at room temperature for 15 min in the dark. For TiO2 enrichment of phosphopeptides, packed tips were sequentially washed with glycolic acid buffer 2, 99/1 H2O/ACN and eluted with four sequential washes of 5% NH4OH in 1% ACN. LC-MS/MS analysis and data processing was performed as described61 (link). Briefly, phosphopeptide pellets were resuspended in 20 μl of 0.1% TFA, and 4 μl was loaded into an LC-MS/MS system, which consists of a nanoflow ultrahigh pressure liquid chromatography (UPLC, nanoAccuity, Waters) coupled online to an Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The top five most intense multiply charged ions were selected for collision-induced dissociation fragmentation in multistage activation mode. The resolution of MS1 was set to 60,000.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Proteomic Analysis of macroH2A Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nuclear extract from 293F FLAG macroH2A cell lines was prepared and dialyzed into BC100 buffer (20 mM Tris CI pH 7.6, 2 mM EDTA, 100 mM KCI, 10% glycerol, and 0.2 mM PMSF), incubated with M2 agarose beads and washed 3X with BC300. Flag peptide eluted complexes were run SDS-PAGE gels and colloidal blue stained. MacroH2A IP specific bands were sent for mass spectrometry. Proteins were digested and extracted peptides (Wilker et al., 2007 (link)) loaded on a precolumn and separated by reverse phase HPLC (Agilent) over a 75 min gradient before nanoelectrospray using Orbitrap XL mass spectrometer (Thermo). Raw mass spectral data files were processed as described (Johnson et al., 2012 (link)). Mascot peptide identifications were verified manually with the assistance of CAMV (Curran et al., 2013 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!