The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Xl 2000

Manufactured by Qsonica
Sourced in United States

The XL-2000 is a high-performance ultrasonic liquid processor designed for laboratory applications. It is capable of performing tasks such as cell disruption, homogenization, and emulsification. The device utilizes ultrasonic waves to effectively process samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

19 protocols using xl 2000

1

Colchicine-Loaded Niosomal Formulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A method described previously by Shehata et al. was followed to formulate niosomal preparation using thin film hydration method [36 (link)]. Accordingly, non-ionic surfactant (span 60) and cholesterol with a molar ratio (1:1) were mixed together, followed by adding sufficient quantity of DSPE-PEG 2000 and then dissolved in chloroform using a round bottom flask. Afterward, under reduced pressure, the mixture was dried at 60 °C using rotary evaporator (Cole-Parmer, T-1602-21, Tokyo, Japan). A dried lipid film was formed on the wall of the flask, which was subjected to hydration using 5 mL dist. water containing colchicine (25 mg), while keeping agitation in water bath at 60 °C for 1 h to get niosomal solution. Consequently, the attained niosome was exposed to probe sonicator (XL-2000, Qsonica, Newtown, CT, USA) for 30 s to obtain the anticipated particle size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Liposomal Formulation Development via Thin Film Hydration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thin film hydration method that was previously described by Knudsen et al. was executed in order to develop different liposomal formulations [48 (link)]. Fifty milligrams of Brucine, ten milligrams of DSPE-PEG 2000 and a specified amount of EPC and cholesterol, as mentioned in Table 1, was added to a round bottom flask and mixed with a 6 mL ethanol: chloroform mixture (1:2). The flask was attached to a rotary evaporator (Heidolph, GmbH, Co. KG, Schwabach, Germany) for 2 h at 100 rpm maintained at 60 °C and operated till complete evaporation of the solvent and formation of thin lipid film on the inner wall of the round-bottom flask. The obtained lipid film was rehydrated with 5 mL phosphate buffer pH 7.4 for 30 min while vortexing using a classic advanced vortex mixer (VELP Scintifica, Usmate Velate, Italy). Next, the resultant dispersion was subjected to sonication for 30 s utilizing probe sonicator (XL-2000, Qsonica, Newtown, CT, USA) to obtain proper particle size. Eleven experimental formulations were fabricated using (CCD) alongside the values of their observed response as clarified in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Retinal ATP Quantification by Luminescence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ATP was measured by luciferin–luciferase assay (Enliten ATP Assay System, Promega). The retina (including RPE) was dissected from enucleated eyes of WT and obetd15 fish and placed in Krebs solution. The samples were transferred to 2.5% trichloroacetic acid (TCA), then homogenized by sonication (3 × 10 seconds, XL-2000 Qsonica LLC) on ice. Cell debris was removed by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 30 minutes at 4 °C. The supernatant was collected and the TCA was neutralized with 1 M Tris–acetate buffer (pH 7.75, final TCA concentration 0.0625%). Protein concentration was measured using the BCA Protein Assay Kit (Pierce), a plate reader (Tecan Safire) and Magellan Software. To analyze ATP levels, 10 µl of the neutralized samples was added to 100 µl of luciferin–luciferase in fresh buffer and ATP was measured using a Glomax-20/20 luminometer (Promega) and data normalized to concentration of protein.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Nanoemulsion Formulation Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Various NE preparations incorporating MX were developed using the specified amounts of constituents. A total of 1% (w/w) of MX was added into the specified amount of EEO and transcutol® P (0.5 g), which is an excellent solvent, and was well-mixed to form the oily phase. Different amounts of tween 80 acting as a surfactant and PEG 400 (0.5 g) as a co-surfactant were added to distilled water, followed by vortexing to form the aqueous phase. Both phases were mixed together, and the volume was adjusted to reach 10 g with distilled water. Mixing of the two phases continued for 15 min using a high shear homogenizer (T 25 digital Ultra-Turrax, IKA, Staufen, Germany) at 20,000 rpm. Promptly, the NE was formed next to homogenization; afterward, it was subjected to 1 min of sonication using a probe sonicator (XL-2000, Qsonica, Newtown, CT, USA) [47 (link)]. The matrix of 11 experimental formulations was constructed using CCD along with the values of their observed responses, as clarified in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

DNA Shearing via Indirect Sonication

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two ways of indirect sonication (i.e., indirect probe sonication and ultrasonic bath) were applied to the DNA. Aliquots, 50 μL of the DNA were transferred to and sealed in the centrifuge tubes. For the indirect probe sonication method, the centrifuge tube was attached on the wall of a 5 mL well, which is filled with deionized water. The probe horn was immerged in the deionized water, tilting at a 45º angle pointing at the centrifuge tube. The DNA was subject to the indirect sonication at 10 W, 22.4 kHz for 1, 5, 10, 20, and 30 minutes. The probe horn was 2 mm in diameter and connected to the XL-2000 ultrasonic dismembrator (Qsonica, Newtown, Danbury, CT, USA). For the ultrasonic bath, the bottom of the centrifuge tubes were immerged into the water of the ultrasonic bath (Branson 2510 Ultrasonic Cleaner; Branson Ultrasonics, Danbury, CT, USA) at 40 kHz for the same amount of the time. Ice was added to maintain the deionized water at room temperature during the indirect sonication treatments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Purification of Polyhistidine-tagged Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polyhistidine-tagged recombinant proteins were obtained by autoinduction (56 (link)) and purified by affinity and gel filtration chromatography. Briefly, BL21(DE3)(pLysS) cells harboring the LIC vectors were grown in ZYP-5052 (1 liter) overnight at 28°C at 250 rpm. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 18,600 × g, resuspended in a mixture of 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7), 150 mM NaCl, 0.5% Triton X-100, protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma), and DNase I (Roche), and lysed by sonication (Misonix, Inc., XL-2000; QSonica). Cell debris was removed by centrifugation, and histidine-tagged proteins were purified using Talon metal affinity resin (Clontech) preequilibrated with buffer A (25 mM HEPES [pH 7], 150 mM NaCl). Proteins bound to the resin were washed extensively with buffer B (25 mM Tris-HCl, 500 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole) and eluted with buffer C (25 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7], 150 mM NaCl, 250 mM imidazole). Fractions containing the eluted protein were pooled and dialyzed overnight in buffer A and further purified by gel filtration chromatography (Äkta, GE Healthcare) using a HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 75 prep-grade column (GE Healthcare) preequilibrated in buffer A.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Nanoemulgel Formulation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Primary emulsion containing ATR was formulated as in the emulgel preparation, followed by homogenization (T 25 digital Ultra-Turrax, IKA, Staufen, Germany) for 5 min at 10,000 rpm and then sonication (XL-2000, Qsonica, Newtown, CT, USA) for 10 min to produce nanoemulsion. The polymeric gel base was prepared in the remaining water. The drug-loaded nanoemulsion was slowly added to the polymeric gel base and then mixed with a mixer for 10 min until a homogenous nanoemulgel was obtained. Compositions of various gel formulations are summarized in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Optimized Nanoemulsion Formulation of Neostigmine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Different NE formulations were prepared using TTO and including NEO; a method lately reported by Shehata et al. was followed and data were displayed in Table 1 [7 (link)]. Fundamentally, the aqueous phase was prepared by dissolving 50 mg of NEO in distilled water containing a specified amount of tween 80. On the other side, 0.5 g of transcutol® P and 50 mg of PEG-DSPE were added to a quantified amount of TTO to provide an oily phase. Together, the two phases were mixed for 10 min at 15,000 rpm using a high shear homogenizer (T 25 digital Ultra-Turrax, IKA, Staufen, Germany) after adjusting the volume to 10 mL with distilled water. The formed NE was exposed to sonication for 30 s in order to obtain a suitable globule size using probe sonicator (XL-2000, Qsonica, Newtown, CT, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Nanoemulsion Formulation Development of DPE

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Several NE formulations of DPE were developed using the specified amounts of constituents. 175 mg of DPE powder were added to different concentrations of arachis oil followed by vortexing. Various concentrations of surfactant (tween 80) in addition to 50 mg of PEG-DSPE were mixed with the oily phase mixture. The aqueous phase and oily phase were heated separately, after that, the aqueous phase was gradually added while homogenization at 20,000 rpm for 15 min to the oily phase using a high shear homogenizer (T 25 digital Ultra-Turrax, IKA, Staufen, Germany). The NEs formed instantly after homogenization followed by sonication for 1 min using a probe sonicator (XL-2000, Qsonica, Newtown, CT, USA) [29 (link)]. The matrix of 12 experimental formulations was assembled by (CCD) along with their observed values of response as illustrated in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Proteomic Extraction from HeLa Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells used to prepare proteomic extracts were grown by Cell Culture Company (formerly National Cell Culture Center, Minneapolis, MN). Proteomes were prepared by re-suspending cell pellets in ice-cold PBS containing protease inhibitor cocktail (EDTA-free, Cell Signaling Technology # 5871S). Samples were then lysed by sonication using a 100 W QSonica XL2000 sonicator (3 × 1 s pulse, amplitude 1, 60 s resting on ice between pulses). Lysates were pelleted by centrifugation (20,817 r.c.f. x 30 minutes, 4 °C) and quantified using the Qubit 4.0 Fluorometer and Qubit Protein Assay Kit. Quantified proteomes were diluted and stored at −80 °C in between uses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!