The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Achieva 3t tx system

Manufactured by Philips
Sourced in Netherlands

The Philips Achieva 3T TX system is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner that operates at a static magnetic field strength of 3 tesla. It is designed to provide high-quality imaging for a variety of clinical and research applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using achieva 3t tx system

1

Perfusion Quantification Accuracy Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the first set of experiments, we used synthetic data to demonstrate the sensitivity of deconvolution and MBF estimation to the delay time between tAIF and tOnset.
Then we tested the accuracy of the tOnset detection algorithm and validated it against gold standard perfusion measurements using an MR-compatible perfusion phantom.
In both experiments, we evaluated the impact of CNR on the detection of the onset arrival time and, thus, on the accuracy of perfusion estimates. For this purpose, the original data were corrupted by adding Rician noise of variable amplitudes to both Caif (t) and Ctiss(t) [12 (link)], [13 (link)]. The range of noise amplitude was chosen so that CNR in the both Caif (t) and Ctiss(t) would be between 5 and 40. Equal noise amplitudes were added to both Caif (t) and Ctiss(t) at each CNR level.
Finally, we compared the results of voxel-wise and segmental analysis performed with optimized tOnset with the results obtained from considering tOnset a free global parameter in phantom and in vivo.
All the analyses described in this study were performed using house-made software programmed with MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA, version R2010b). All data (phantom and patient) were acquired on a Philips Achieva 3T (TX) system, equipped with a 32-channel cardiac-phased array receiver coil (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Diffusion MRI Acquisition Protocol for Healthy Volunteers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Diffusion MRI data were acquired on a Philips Achieva 3T TX system (Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands), equipped with 80 mT/m gradients and a 32‐element receive head coil array, using a diffusion‐weighted single‐shot spin echo EPI sequence. The study was approved by the local ethics committee and meets the guidelines of the declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
Data sets from 16 healthy volunteers (age: 31.6 ± 8.6, gender: 12 male, 4 female) were acquired with the following diffusion scan parameters: TR: 11.85 s, TE: 66 ms, FOV: 220 × 220 mm2, with 40 contiguous slices, slice thickness: 2.3 mm, acquisition and reconstruction matrix: 96 × 96, SENSE factor: 2, partial Fourier encoding: 60%. Diffusion‐weighted images were acquired along 64 directions distributed uniformly on a half‐sphere with a b‐value of 3000 s/mm2 in addition to a b = 0 s/mm2 scan, resulting in a scan time of approximately 13 min. Additionally, 1 mm isotropic T1‐weighted structural images were recorded with a 3D MP‐RAGE sequence (FOV: 240 × 240 × 160 mm3, sagittal orientation, 1 × 1 × 1 mm3 voxel size, TR: 8.14 ms, TE: 3.7 ms, flip angle: 8°).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Ultrafast Breast DCE-MRI Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DCE-MRI was performed with an Achieva 3 T-TX system (Philips Healthcare) and 16-channel bilateral breast coils (MammoTrak, Philips Healthcare). The ultrafast acquisition was a T1-weighted fat-suppressed sequence with an increased SENSE factor, reduced spatial resolution, and very high temporal resolution (7 seconds). The acquisition parameters for ultrafast and standard imaging are summarized in Table 2. The DCE series consisted of one standard and five ultrafast acquisitions before contrast injection and then eight ultrafast and four standard acquisitions after injection of gadobenate dimeglumine (MultiHance, Bracco) at a dose of 0.1 mM/kg and a rate of 2 mL/s followed by a 20-mL saline flush at a rate of 2 mL/s. We obtained five unenhanced images purely for research purposes; the last (5th) unenhanced image was used for the subtraction mask. Acquisition of the ultrafast contrast-enhanced series started 10 seconds after the beginning of contrast injection and ended 66 seconds after the beginning of the injection. The standard acquisition started immediately after completion of the ultrafast acquisition and ended 5 minutes 26 seconds after the beginning of the contrast injection. Figure 1 shows the ultrafast and standard imaging protocols.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Optimized 31P/1H MRI Brain Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were acquired on a Philips Achieva 3 T TX system (Best, Netherlands). Volunteer and phantom scans were conducted solely using a dual-tuned 31P/1H head coil (Rapid Biomedical, Germany). Parameters for the final acquisition protocol used in patients were optimised using a combination of phantoms and volunteers.
Patient data were acquired using a combination of both the 31P/1H head coil and a 32 channel 1H Philips head coil. Standard imaging was performed using the 32 channel 1H head coil or the neurovascular coil. Basic localiser imaging and 31P spectroscopy was performed using the 31P/1H head coil.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Harmonized MRI Acquisition for Preterm and Full-Term Infants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI data acquisition has been described previously4, 23: At both sites, Bonn and Munich, MRI data acquisition was performed on Philips Achieva 3 T TX systems or Philips Ingenia 3 T system using an 8‐channel SENSE head coil. Subject distribution among scanners was as follows: Bonn Achieva 3 T: 5 VP/VLBW, 12 FT, Bonn Ingenia 3 T: 33 VP/VLBW, 17 FT, Munich Achieva 3 T: 60 VP/VLBW, 65 FT, Munich Ingenia 3 T: 3 VP/VLBW, 17 FT. Across all scanners, sequence parameters were kept identical. Scanners were checked regularly to provide optimal scanning conditions and MRI physicists at the University Hospital Bonn and Klinikum rechts der Isar regularly scanned imaging phantoms to ensure within‐scanner signal stability over time. Signal‐to‐noise ratio was not significantly different between scanners (one‐way ANOVA with factor ‘scanner‐ID’ [Bonn 1, Bonn 2, Munich 1, Munich 2]; F(3,182) = 1.84, p = 0.11). A high‐resolution T1w 3D‐MPRAGE sequence (TI = 1300 ms, TR = 7.7 ms, TE = 3.9 ms, flip angle = 15°, field of view = 256 mm × 256 mm, reconstruction matrix = 256 × 256, reconstructed isotropic voxel size = 1 mm3) was acquired. All images were visually inspected for artifacts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Cross-site Brain Imaging Protocol with Scanner Upgrade

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At both sites, MR data were initially acquired on identical Philips Achieva 3 T TX systems (Philips, Best, Netherlands), using 8-channel SENSE head coils. Due to a scanner upgrade, Bonn had to switch to a complementary Philips Ingenia 3 T system after n = 15 participants, while Munich had to do the same switch after n = 105 participants (Supplementary Table 1). Yet, the identical sequence parameters were used on all scanners. To account for possible confounds introduced by the scanner-specific differences, all second-level functional data analyses included dummy regressors for scanner identity as covariates of no interest.
During each run, 215 T2*-weighted EPI volumes were acquired (TR = 2000 ms, TE = 35 ms, flip angle = 82°, parallel imaging with SENSE = 2 (A − P); 32 interleaved oblique axial slices with a slice thickness = 4 mm (no gap); field of view = 220 × 220 × 128 mm; reconstruction matrix = 96 × 96; reconstructed voxel size = 2.29 × 2.29 × 4 mm). Five additional dummy scans were acquired (to achieve longitudinal magnetization equilibrium), but were already discarded before image reconstruction. For image registration purposes, high-resolution T1-weighted 3D-MPRAGE volumes were acquired (TI = 1300 ms, TR = 7.7 ms, TE = 3.9 ms, flip angle = 15°; 180 sagittal slices, field of view: 256 × 256 mm, reconstructed voxel size = 13 mm3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multisite MRI Neuroimaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At both sites, Bonn and Munich, MRI data acquisition was performed on Philips Achieva 3 T TX systems or Philips Ingenia 3 T system using an 8‐channel SENSE head coil. Subject distribution among scanners: Bonn Achieva 3 T: 5 VP/VLBW, 12 FT, Bonn Ingenia 3 T: 33 VP/VLBW, 17 FT, Munich Achieva 3 T: 60 VP/VLBW, 65 FT, Munich Ingenia 3 T: 3 VP/VLBW, 17 FT. To account for possible confounds by scanner differences, functional and structural data analyses included scanner dummy‐variables as covariates of no interest. Across all scanners, sequence parameters were kept identical. Scanners were checked regularly to provide optimal scanning conditions and MRI physicists at the University Hospital Bonn and Klinikum rechts der Isar regularly scanned imaging phantoms, to ensure within‐scanner signal stability over time. Signal‐to‐noise ratio was not significantly different between scanners (one‐way analysis of variance with factor “scanner‐ID” [Bonn 1, Bonn 2, Munich 1, Munich 2]; F(3,182) = 1.84, p = .11). A high‐resolution T1‐weighted 3D‐MPRAGE sequence (TI = 1,300 ms, TR = 7.7 ms, TE = 3.9 ms, flip angle = 15°; 180 sagittal slices, FOV = 256 × 256 × 180 mm, reconstruction matrix = 256 × 256; reconstructed isotropic voxel size = 1 mm3) was acquired. All images were visually inspected for artifacts and passed homogeneity control implemented in the CAT12 toolbox (Gaser & Dahnke, 2016).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

High-Resolution T1-Weighted MRI Acquisition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI data acquisition has been described previously:12 (link),22 (link) at both sites, Bonn and Munich, MRI data acquisition was performed on Philips Achieva 3T TX systems or Philips Ingenia 3T systems using an eight-channel SENSE head coil. Subject distribution among scanners: Bonn Achieva 3T: 5 VP/VLBW, 12 FT, Bonn Ingenia 3T: 33 VP/VLBW, 17 FT, Munich Achieva 3T: 60 VP/VLBW, 65 FT, Munich Ingenia 3T: 3 VP/VLBW, 17 FT. Across all scanners, sequence parameters were kept identical. Scanners were checked regularly to provide optimal scanning conditions and MRI physicists at the University Hospital Bonn and Klinikum Rechts der Isar regularly scanned imaging phantoms, to ensure within-scanner signal stability over time. The signal-to-noise ratio was not significantly different between scanners [one-way ANOVA with factor ‘Scanner-ID’ (Bonn 1, Bonn 2, Munich 1, Munich 2); F (3,182) = 1.84, P = 0.11]. A high-resolution T1-weighted 3D-magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo sequence (inversion time = 1300 ms, repetition time = 7.7 ms, echo time = 3.9 ms, flip angle = 15°, field of view = 256 mm × 256 mm, reconstruction matrix = 256 × 256 and reconstructed isotropic voxel size = 1 mm3) was acquired. All images were visually inspected for artefacts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Standardized 3T MRI Data Acquisition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At both sites, MRI data acquisition was initially performed on Philips Achieva 3T TX systems (Achieva, Philips, the Netherlands), using an 8-channel SENSE head coil. Due to a scanner upgrade, data acquisition in Bonn had to switch to Philips Ingenia 3T system with an 8-channel SENSE head coil after N = 17 participants. To account for possible confounds introduced by scanner differences, data analyses included scanner identities as covariates of no interest. Across all scanners, sequence parameters were kept identical. Scanners were checked regularly to provide optimal scanning conditions. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was not significantly different between scanners (one-way ANOVA with factor "scanner-ID" [Bonn 1, Bonn 2, Munich]; P = 0.811). A high-resolution T1-weighted 3D-MPRAGE sequence (TI = 1300 ms, TR = 7.7 ms, TE = 3.9 ms, flip angle = 15°; 180 sagittal slices, FOV = 256 × 256 × 180 mm, reconstruction matrix = 256 × 256; reconstructed voxel size = 1 × 1 × 1 mm3) was acquired.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!