The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

18 protocols using anti cd4 clone gk1

1

Multi-parameter Flow Cytometry Immune Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were suspended in FACS buffer (2% FBS in PBS) and pre-stained for the surface markers with anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5) and anti-CD8 (clone 53–6.7) (Biolegend). For intracellular staining, cells were then fixed for 1 hour at 4°C with Foxp3/transcription factor staining buffer set (eBioscience, San Diego, CA), then stained for 1 hour at room temperature with anti-Interferon-γ (clone XMG1.2, eBioscience) or anti-Foxp3 (clone FJK-16s, eBioscience). Data were acquired on Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA) then analyzed by FlowJo (Tree Star, Ashland, OR, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiparameter Flow Cytometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single cell suspensions of spleens were blocked with anti-mouse CD16/32 (BioLegend) and surface stained with the indicated markers, and evaluated by flow cytometric analysis as described18 (link),29 (link),35 (link)–37 (link). The following Abs were used; anti-CD45 (clone 30-F11, Invitrogen), anti-PD-1 (clone 29F.1A12, BioLegend), anti-CX3CR1 (clone SA011F11, BioLegend), anti-KLRG1 (clone 2F1/KLRG1, BioLegend), anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5, BioLegend), anti-CD8α (clone 53-6.7, BD Biosciences), and anti-CD3 (clone 145-2C11, BioLegend). LIVE/DEAD Fixable Near-IR Dead Cell Stain kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific)-stained cells were excluded from the analysis. Samples were acquired by Fortessa (BD Biosciences) cytometers, and analyzed with FlowJo software (Treestar).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Modulating T Cell Signaling Pathways

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For PP2 assay, day 6–10 blasting T cells were pre-incubated with PP2 (10 μM; 4-Amino-5-(4-chlorophenyl)-7-(t-butyl)pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine; Sigma-Aldrich) for 1 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Pre-treated cells were imaged at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in the presence of 10 μM PP2.
For CD4 and CD28 blockade, an anti-CD4 (clone Gk1.5, BioLegend) or anti-CD28 (clone 37.51, BioLegend) Fab was prepared and purified with Micro Fab Preparation Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Day 6–10 T cells were pre-incubated for 1 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2 with anti-CD4 Fab (2 μg/mL) or anti-CD28 Fab (4 μg/mL) then imaged in the presence of 2 μg/mL Fab.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Tumor-Infiltrating Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions of transplanted tumors were obtained by digestion with 1 mg/ml Collagenase I (Sigma) and 1 mg/ml Dispase II (Roche) in RPMI containing 5 % FBS for 45 min at 37°C under shaking condition. The cell suspension was passed through a 70 μm nylon mesh and centrifuged. After red blood cell lysis, Fc receptors were blocked with anti-mouse FcR antibody (clone 93, Biolegend) for 15 min at a 1:100 dilution on ice. Then, cells were stained with anti-CD45 (clone 30-F11, Biolegend), CD11b (clone M1/70, Biolegend), Gr-1 (clone RB6-8C5, Biolegend), F4/80 (clone BM8, Biolegend), PDGFRα (clone APA5; Biolegend), CD206 (clone C068C2, Biolegend), CD11c (clone N418, Biolegend) and MHC II (I-A/I-E, clone M5/114.15.2, Biolegend) antibodies for 30 min at a 1:100 dilution on ice. For analysis of Treg cells in the tumor, cells were stained with anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5, Biolegend, 1:100), Foxp3 (clone FJK-16s, eBioscience, 1:50) antibodies using a Foxp3 staining buffer kit following the instructions (eBioscience). Samples were acquired on a Canto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and the data were analyzed with FlowJo software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cytokine Analysis of Stimulated Lung Leukocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lung leukocytes were stimulated with plate bound anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies (2.5μg/ml) in 96 well plates (2.5×106/well) for a total of 6 hours, with Brefeldin A and monensin (Biolegend) added during the last 4 hours. Cells were washed in PBS then stained Live Dead Fixable Aqua (Life Technologies) and anti-CD45 (clone 30-F11), anti-TCRβ (clone H57-597), anti-CD8α (53-6.7), and anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5) antibodies (Biolegend), washed, then fixed in 2% formaldehyde. Intracellular cytokines were detected by staining with anti-IFN-γ (clone XGM1.2), anti-IL-17A (TC11-18H10.1), anti-IL-5 (TRFK5), anti-IL-13 (eBio13A), Tbet (4B10), GATA3 (16E10A23), FoxP3 (FJK-16s) and Eomesodermin (Dan11mag, eBioscience) antibodies in Permeabilzation Buffer (eBioscience). Data were acquired on a LSRII cytometer and analyzed with FlowJo (Treestar, Eugene Oregon). A representative gating scheme is shown in Fig. S1A.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry Analysis of Murine Splenocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Single-cell suspensions from spleen of mice were stained with anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5; BioLegend), anti-CD25 (clone 3C7; BioLegend), and anti-FoxP3 (clone MF-14; BioLegend). In the case of intracellular cytokine staining, splenocytes were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% fetal calf serum, 2 mM L-glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 U/ml streptomycin in presence of phorbol-12-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) (50 ng/ml; Sigma), ionomycin (1 μg/ml; Sigma), and monensin (BioLegend) for 5 h. Cells were washed, fixed, permeabilized, and stained with anti-IL-17 (clone TC11-18H10.1; BioLegend). Viable single cells were analyzed based on forward and side light scatter properties with a CyFlow Cube 6 flow cytometer (Sysmex) or MACSQuant Analyzer 10 flow cytometer (Miltenyi Biotec).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Selective Cell Depletion for Vaccine Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An intraperitoneal injection with 500 µg of anti-PDCA1 (clone 927, BioLegend) or intravenous injection with 100 µg of anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5, BioLegend) was performed to deplete pDCs or CD4+ cells 1 day before immunization with the vaccine. To deplete CD8+ cells, an intraperitoneal injection with 100 µg of anti-CD8α (clone 2.43, Bio X cell, Lebanon, NH) was performed at 15, 17, 19, and 21 days after the inoculation of tumor. To deplete macrophages, 200 µL of clophosome-A (FormuMax Scientific, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA) was intravenously administered on days 1 and 6 before immunization with the vaccine.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Bone Marrow Transplantation in Atm-Deficient Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Atm-deficient mice received 0.125 mg/mL anti CD4 (clone GK1.5, BioLegend Cat# 100435, RRID:AB_2075571) and 0.125 mg/mL anti CD8 (clone 53–6.7, BioLegend Cat# 100735, RRID:AB_2075237) monoclonal antibody, 7 days before bone marrow transplantation (BMT) and a second dose of each antibody in combination with cyclophosphamide (CP, 80 ng/mL, Endoxan, Baxter, Unterschleißheim, Germany) 1 day before BMT as non-myeloablative conditioning. 5 × 106 bone marrow donor cells (BMDCs) were sterilely harvested from 129S6/SvEv GFP-transfected wild-type mice and were then injected intravenously into conditioned recipients (22 (link), 24 (link)). Grafting of ATM-competent GFP+ bone marrow-derived donor cells was traced in the peripheral blood of Atm-deficient mice over the time, 6, 12, and 24 weeks post-transplantation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Isolation and Purification of CD4+ and CD8+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lymph nodes (LN) were isolated from all regions of the body except the mesenteric LN. Single cell suspensions were obtained by grinding the LN through a 70 µm nylon mesh. Purified CD4+ or CD8+ populations were obtained by negative selection. Briefly, LN cells were incubated with biotinylated anti-CD45R (B220, clone RA3-6B2), anti-I-A/I-E (clone M5/114.15-2), anti-CD11b (clone M1/70), anti-CD49b (clone DX5) and either anti-CD4 (clone GK1.5) or anti-CD8α (clone 53–607) (Biolegend). Cells were washed and incubated with streptavidin microbeads (Miltenyi), washed and passed over a magnetic column (Miltenyi) and the negative fraction collected. Cells were then labeled with 2 µM CFDA-SE (Invitrogen) and resuspended in the appropriate media for the given assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Investigating the Role of IL-33 and T Cells in Obese Mice's Ozone-Induced Pulmonary Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess the role of IL-33 in pulmonary responses to O3, WT and db/db mice were treated with an antibody directed against the extracellular domain of recombinant murine ST2 (10 mg/kg, i.p.) or with isotype (IgG1) antibodies. At this dose, anti-ST2 blocks responses to exogenous IL-33 in mice (Palmer et al. 2009 (link)). Mice were exposed to O3 24 hr later, and evaluated 24 hr after exposure. Evaluation included measurement of airway responsiveness, BAL, and lung tissue and blood harvest.
To evaluate the role of CD4 cells in O3-induced changes in type 2 cytokines, we depleted CD4 cells. Db/db mice were injected once with anti-CD4 (clone: GK1.5, Biolegend) (8 mg/kg) or isotype antibody (Rice and Bucy 1995 (link)). Mice were exposed to O3 6 days later and evaluated as described above. Confirmation of CD4 depletion in lung tissue was assessed by flow cytometry.
To examine the role of γδ T cells in obese mice, WT and TCRδ–/– mice were fed either an HFD or normal chow, and then exposed to air or to O3, and evaluated as described above.
Methods for BAL, measurement of cytokines and chemokines, RNA extraction and RT-qPCR, and flow cytometry were as previously described (Krishnamoorthy et al. 2015 (link); Williams et al. 2013 (link)) and are found in an online supplement (see “Supplemental Methods” in the Supplemental Material).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!