The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

G 25 spin column

Manufactured by Cytiva
Sourced in United States

The G-25 spin column is a laboratory product designed for the rapid separation of small molecules from macromolecules, such as proteins or nucleic acids. The column contains a porous matrix that allows for the effective separation of these components based on their size differences. The G-25 spin column can be used in various applications that require the removal of small molecules, buffer exchange, or sample clean-up.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using g 25 spin column

1

Quantifying preQ1 Riboswitch Binding Kinetics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Purified Can RNA was labeled with 32P-γ-ATP via T4 Polynucleotide Kinase. The construct sequence was: 5′-UGUGGUUCGCAACCAUCCCACAUAAAAAAACUAGGAGGAUUCACACAUGUAGACAAAAAAUAUCGUCACAAA. Here, the WT Can riboswitch (underlined) is followed by the native sequence through the start codon (bold). A stop codon (italics) was placed immediately downstream. Radiolabeled RNA was purified by passing through a G-25 spin column (Cytiva, MA). Translation initiation and RelE cleavage were performed as described (38 (link)). Concentrations of preQ1 ranged from 0 to 500 μM, and translation initiation reactions were incubated at 37 °C for 30 min prior to RelE cleavage. Full-length and cleaved species were separated on a 10% denaturing polyacrylamide gel, visualized with a Typhoon imager (Cytiva), and analyzed with ImageQuant (Cytiva).
Band intensities were analyzed under the assumption that the concentration of the labeled RNA is much less than the K1/2. The data were fit in Prism 9 (GraphPad, Inc.) with the following equation:
where X is the concentration of ligand; Y is the percent cleaved; K is the K1/2; Ymin is the minimum percent cleaved; amplitude is the difference between Ymax and Ymin; and n is the Hill coefficient.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Preparation of Replication Fork Substrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The regressed fork, i.e., Chicken-foot (CF) substrate, and replication fork (RF) substrate were prepared using oligonucleotides listed in Supplementary Table 1 as follows: For fork restoration assays, 10 pmol of oligo B was labeled at its 5’ end using T4 polynucleotide kinase and 30 µCi γ32P-ATP in a 20 ul reaction at 37 °C for 40 min. After heat inactivation at 65 °C for 20 min, free ATP was removed by applying the sample to a G-25 spin column (Cytiva). 10 pmol of either oligo A (for CF) or oligo D (for RF) was annealed to the labeled oligo B in 50 µl total volume with 10 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5 and 50 mM NaCl by heating the oligonucleotides at 95 °C for 5 min followed by slow cooling to RT. 50 pmol of Oligo C and either oligo D (for CF) or A (for RF) were annealed similarly in 10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, and 50 mM NaCl. Just prior to the fork restoration assay, the CF substrate was prepared by combining 1 pmol of radiolabeled substrate AB and 2 pmol of unlabeled substrate CD in annealing buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl2, 50 mM NaCl) and incubating at 37 °C for 30 min followed by RT for an additional 30 min. For the replication fork, radiolabeled 1 pmol of BD substrate was annealed to 2 pmol of substrate AC in a similar fashion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Purification of His-FLAG-TBK1 Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Baculovirus was generated by transfecting purified bacmid DNA into Sf9 cells using FuGENE HD (E1910, Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA), and subsequently used to infect suspension cultures of Sf9 cells (2 × 106 cells/mL) with a multiplicity of infection of 1. Infected Sf9 cells were incubated at 27 °C for 48 h for protein expression. The Sf9 cells were suspended in buffer A (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 10% glycerol, and 1 × protease inhibitor), sonicated at 4 °C and centrifuged at 28,980× g for 20 min. Soluble protein fractions were mixed with FLAG-M2-agarose beads (A2220, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MI, USA) pre-equilibrated with buffer A. The His-FLAG-TBK1 protein was eluted using buffer A containing 3 × FLAG peptide (200 µg/mL), concentrated using an Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filter unit (Merck, Billerica, MA, USA), and applied to a G-25 spin column (Cytiva) pre-equilibrated with buffer including 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 × protease inhibitor, and 1 × phosphatase inhibitor (PhosSTOP, 04906837001, Roche, Basel, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Radiolabeling Riboswitch and UTR RNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was transcribed directly off oligonucleotides (Supplemental Table S2) ordered either from Keck Oligo Synthesis Resource at Yale University or Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT) and purified via denaturing 10% PAGE. For 5′ radiolabeling, riboswitch RNA was dephosphorylated with Antarctic Phosphatase (NEB) and labeled with 32P-γ-ATP (Perkin Elmer) via T4 PNK (NEB). For yeast 5′-UTR isoforms, RNA was capped with 32P-α-GTP via the Vaccinia Capping System (NEB). Radiolabeled RNA was similarly purified via denaturing PAGE or by passing through a G-25 spin column (Cytiva).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Preparation of Partial Duplex Substrates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The oligonucleotides used to prepare the partial duplex substrates used in this study are shown (Table S3). To prepare RNA, DNA, DNA–RNA hybrid, and poly(hexa)ethylene glycol (PEG) forked substrates, 10 pmol of ss RNA/DNA was incubated at 37 °C for 40 min in T4 Polynucleotide Kinase (PNK) buffer (70 mM Tris-HCl [pH 7.6], 10 mM MgCl2, 5 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 30 μCi γ-32P-ATP, and PNK) (New England Biolabs) in a 20-μl reaction mixture. PNK was heat-inactivated for 20 min at 75 °C. Excess γ-32P-ATP was removed by centrifugation of the sample in a G25 spin column (Cytiva). Top (complementary) strand, 25 pmol, was added to the radiolabeled ss RNA/DNA, and the final volume was brought up to 50 μl with ddH2O. Substrates were annealed by heating at 95 °C for 5 min followed by cooling to room temperature (RT) overnight. Substrates were stored at 4 °C.
Theoretical Tmvalues of selected partial duplex DNA, RNA, or DNA/RNA hybrid substrates were determined using the calculator https://penchovsky.atwebpages.com/TMres.php (52 ). These Tm values take into account duplex DNA concentration and monovalent cation concentration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!