The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Nylon flocked swab

Manufactured by Copan
Sourced in Italy

Nylon flocked swabs are sterile collection devices designed for obtaining samples. They feature a nylon fiber-based tip that is used to collect specimens for analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using nylon flocked swab

1

Multisite Sampling for Microbiome Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Subjects provided oral and sputum samples on day 1; another oral sample and a nasal sample were obtained the morning of day 2, after fasting overnight. Oral samples were obtained by having subjects swish sterile water in their mouths for 30 seconds and then expectorating into a DNA-free tube. After oral wash sampling, sputum was obtained by spontaneous expectoration (if the subject was able to do so) or by induction using 3% saline (0.9% saline if FEV1 <40% predicted) and expectorating into a DNA-free container. Nasal samples were obtained by swabbing each anterior nare/nasopharynx with a nylon-flocked swab (Copan Diagnostics, Inc., Murrieta, CA), which were combined in a sterile, DNA-free tube. One subject was unable to provide a sputum sample. Oral washes and sputa were weighed and all samples were immediately frozen at -80°C until sample processing. DNA contamination of reagents and equipment was evaluated using both liquid protocol and swab protocol extraction controls, which were processed and analyzed alongside the experimental samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Axillary Skin Swabbing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The right axillae were swabbed with nylon-tipped swabs (Nylon Flocked Swab in a dry tube, Copan) moistened with a 150-μL solution of Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer (10 mM Tris, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8) and 0.5% (v/v) Tween-20. The skin surface was swabbed in two perpendicular directions within a sterile steel ring of 2.5 cm diameter. The swab head was cut from the stick with sterile scissors and placed in the inner tube of the Swab Extraction Tube System (SETS, Roche). Samples were centrifuged for 1 min at 6,000 g. The eluate (about 100 μL) was stored at −20°C. At each of the four sampling times (morning and afternoon sessions over 2 days), a negative control was performed by moistening a swab tip with TE (but without swabbing any surface).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Lung Microbiome Sampling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The day before surgery, we collected the first oral wash sample and an induced sputum sample. The morning of surgery, we collected the second oral wash sample. In the operating room we collected samples from the resected lobe, taking care to avoid the lung tumor and sample the adjacent healthy-appearing lung tissue. Three separate samples were obtained from the lung parenchyma by cutting open the distal lung tissue and vigorously swabbing the alveolar air spaces for 30 s. Bronchial samples were obtained from the main bronchial airway supplying the removed lobe using a nylon-flocked swab (Copan Diagnostics, Murrieta, CA). Nasopharyngeal samples were obtained by swabbing the nasopharynx for 15 s. Negative control samples consisted of unused sterile water or unused swabs which were processed concurrently with subject samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Pyoderma Lesion Microbiological Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Wound swabs were taken to determine the presence of S. aureus and/or GAS by microbiological culture. A single swab was taken from the largest present pyoderma lesion; wounds were superficially cleaned with saline and crusts were lifted to swab the base. Samples were collected using Nylon flocked swabs (Copan) stored in liquid Amies transport medium. These were chosen over standard cotton swabs as future molecular/microbiome studies are planned. Swabs were transported in a cold box to the MRC Unit The Gambia at LSHTM (MRCG) for same-day culturing on 5% sheep’s blood agar and incubated at 37°C overnight. Purity plates were done for mixed infection. Identification by catalase and confirmation for either S. aureus or GAS was done using the Remel Staphaurex Plus and Streptex latex agglutination tests, respectively. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern was obtained using disc diffusion according to CLSI methods [30 ] in line with the MRCG clinical diagnostic laboratory wound culture standard operating procedures. Only S. aureus and beta-haemolytic streptococci were considered relevant organisms to record.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Longitudinal COVID-19 Symptom Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We collected exposure, sociodemographic, and clinical data at enrollment through review of electronic medical records and a directed caregiver questionnaire conducted by telephone. We recorded symptoms occurring up to 14 days prior to enrollment. Research staff conducted follow-up questionnaires by phone for all participants 7 days after study enrollment to document new symptoms and healthcare encounters. For participants with ongoing symptoms 7 days after study enrollment, additional questionnaires were administered 14 and 28 days after enrollment, or until the participant reported complete symptom resolution. We recorded the results of SARS-CoV-2 testing performed for clinical care. Research staff collected nasopharyngeal swabs from participants who consented to a home visit. Participants who declined a home visit received a kit for self-collection of a mid-turbinate nasal swab. Nasopharyngeal and nasal samples were collected with nylon flocked swabs (Copan Italia, Brescia, Italy) into RNAProtect (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Seabird Mortality Investigation in South Africa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Seabirds that became moribund or died on beaches or at breeding colonies in SA were collected by members of the public, managing conservation authorities, rehabilitation centres and Veterinary Services (Roberts et al., 2022 ). For this study, whole bird carcases or tissue samples transported in cool boxes with frozen ice packs were submitted to the Western Cape Provincial Veterinary Laboratory (WCPVL). Some moribund birds were received and were humanely euthanized shortly after arrival. In total, samples from 49 individual birds were received for testing. All were coastal seabirds, apart from a raptor—a single Jackal Buzzard (Buteo rufofuscus). Post‐mortem findings included poor body condition, green diarrhoea, enlarged livers and severe lung congestion. Brain, oropharyngeal and cloacal swab samples were collected using nylon flocked swabs (Copan Diagnostics Inc., Murrieta, CA, USA). Swab samples were also taken from the internal contents (i.e. the mixed allantoic–amniotic fluids within each egg) of four abandoned Swift Tern eggs collected at a breeding site at the Victoria & Alfred Waterfront in Cape Town where large numbers of bird deaths due to HPAI were recorded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Prospective Study of SARS-CoV-2 in Children

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Duke Biospecimens from RespirAtory Virus-Exposed Kids (BRAVE Kids) Study is a prospective cohort study of children, adolescents, and young adults (<21 years of age) with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection or close contact with an individual with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, as previously described [4 ]. Exposure, sociodemographic, and clinical data are collected at enrollment, and we record symptoms occurring up to 14 days prior to and 28 days after study enrollment. Nasopharyngeal samples are collected with nylon flocked swabs (Copan Italia, Brescia, Italy) and placed into RNAProtect (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) prior to storage at −80°C. Participants are classified as SARS-CoV-2 infected if the virus is detected in either a clinical or research polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. For the analyses presented herein, we considered SARS-CoV-2–infected individuals to have respiratory symptoms if they reported cough, rhinorrhea, nasal congestion, shortness of breath, sore throat, or anosmia at any point between 14 days prior to enrollment through 28 days after enrollment.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Nylon Flocked Swabs for Sputum Sampling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
NP swabs were obtained at enrolment using nylon flocked swabs (Copan Italia, Brescia, Italy) by study staff. Sputum was subsequently obtained (expectorated or induced where necessary). Samples were immediately stored in 1 ml of skim milk, tryptone, glucose, and glycerine (STGG) medium, placed on ice for a maximum of 1 h and then frozen down to at -80 °C. The samples were transported on dry ice to Cape Town, South Africa, for batch processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Longitudinal COVID-19 Symptom Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We collected exposure, sociodemographic, and clinical data at enrollment through review of electronic medical records and a directed caregiver questionnaire conducted by telephone. We recorded symptoms that occurred up to 14 days prior to enrollment. Research staff completed follow-up questionnaires by phone for all participants 7 days after study enrollment to document new symptoms and healthcare encounters. For participants with ongoing symptoms 7 days after study enrollment, additional questionnaires were administered 14 and 28 days after enrollment or until the participant reported complete symptom resolution. We recorded the results of SARS-CoV-2 testing performed for clinical care. Research staff collected nasopharyngeal swabs from participants who consented to a home visit. Participants who declined a home visit received a kit for self-collection of a midturbinate nasal swab. Nasopharyngeal and nasal samples were collected with nylon flocked swabs (Copan Italia, Brescia, Italy) into RNAProtect (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Respiratory Pathogen Specimen Collection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two paired induced sputa and a nasopharyngeal (NP) swab specimens were collected from each child and transported to the laboratory within 2 h of collection. NP swabs were obtained before sputum induction using nylon flocked swabs (Copan Italia, Brescia, Italy) by trained study staff [11 (link)]. Each NP swab was immediately placed into 1.5 ml PrimeStore® transport and stabilization medium (PrimeStore® MTM, Longhorn Vaccines and Diagnostics, San Antonio, TX) and stored at −80 °C within 2 h of collection until further batch processing. Samples were randomly selected from a convenience subset of 214 children, over a 1-year period for testing of NP specimens for other microbes.
As the volume obtained on induced sputum specimens was small, the entire specimen was required for detection of M tuberculosis, for optimal management and as this study was nested within a broader study investigating better diagnostics for TB in children [11 (link)]. We did not want to compromise this primary aim and only NP samples were available for study of other respiratory pathogens.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!