The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

10 protocols using prmt5

1

Western Blot Antibody Panel Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting was performed as described previously [33 (link)]. The antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (PRMT5, p21 Waf1/Cip1, GAPDH, ATM, phospho-histone H2AX (Ser139), cyclin D1, Rb, phospho-Rb (Ser780), CDK6, PARP, cleaved caspase-7), Invitrogen (CDK4), Sigma (H4R3me2s, SYM10, SYM11), Santa Cruz (p53, β-actin), and Bethyl (HdmX/MDM4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were collected and lysed with RIPA lysis buffer, followed by centrifugation at 20,000×g for 10 min at 4 °C. Protein concentration was determined by BCA assay (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA). Cellular proteins were separated by 4.0-20.0% SDS-PAGE (Genscript, Piscataway Township, USA) and then transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. The membrane was blocked by TBST with 5% fat free milk, and incubated with antibodies directed against the following proteins: Insulin (1:1000) (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, USA, Cat # 8138S); PRMT5 (1:1000) (Cell Signaling Technology, USA, Danvers, Cat # ab31751); and β-actin (1:10000) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA, Cat # A5441). Immunoreactive proteins were visualized by exposure to X-ray film. Protein bands were analyzed by image-scanning.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Protein Fractionation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole cell lysates, SDS page, and Western blot analysis were performed as previously described (6 ). Nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions were isolated using the NE-PER kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The sDMA-recognizing antibodies are given in Fig. S2A. Other antibodies used were MTAP (catalog no.: SC-100782; Santa Cruz), actin (catalog no.: A4700; Sigma), PRMT5 (catalog no.: 2252; Cell Signaling Technology), FBP1 (catalog no.: sc-271241), FBP3 (catalog no.: sc-398466), eIF4H (catalog no.: sc-515265), PSPC1 (catalog no.: sc374181), and PABN1 (catalog no.: 66807-1-Ig; Proteintech).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of Cellular Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysis was performed at 4 °C using ice cold RIPA lysis buffer containing 25 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40, 0.5% Sodium Deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS. Protein extracts were analysed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. ECL signals were detected as described before [76 (link)]. The following antibodies were used: α-tubulin (Thermo Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), CD63 (Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), ALDOA, calnexin, FXR2, PKM2, PRMT5 (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), CD81 (Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA), HIF1α (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), CD9, Tsg101 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), IPO11 (Novus Biologicals, Centennial, CO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Proteins were extracted in RIPA buffer (Boston Bioproducts, #BP-115DG) and separated by SDS-PAGE. They were then transferred onto PVDF membranes and probed with antibodies against Symmetric Di-Methyl Arginine Motif/SDMA (Cell Signaling, #13222, MultiMab rabbit monoclonal antibody mix, 1:1000), HSP90 (BD, #610418, Clone 68, 1:10,000), PRMT5 (Cell Signaling, #2252S, 1:1000), GAPDH (Santa Cruz, #sc-365062, Clone G-9, 1:1000), SOS1 (Cell Signaling, #5890, 1:1000), STAT5B (Santa Cruz, #sc-1656, 1:200), RAF1 (Cell Signaling, #9422, 1:1000), AURKB/AIM1 (BD, #611082, Clone 6, 1:1000), SNRPB (Sigma, #HPA003482, 1:200), SNRPD3 (Sigma, #HPA001170, 1:200), SART3/TIP110 (Bethyl, #A301-521A, 1:10,000), PRP3 (MBL, #D171-3, 1:1000), SNRNP40 (MBL, #RN096PW, 1:1000), anti-H4R3me2s (Abcam, #5823, 1:500) and EIF4E (Cell Signaling, #9742, 1:1000). Proteins of interest were detected with HRP-conjugated α-Rabbit (Cell Signaling, #7074, 1:3000), Rat (Cell Signaling, #7077,1:2000) and α-Mouse (Cell Signaling, #7076, 1:2000) antibodies and visualized with the Pierce ECL Western blotting substrate (Thermo Scientific) using the ImageQuant LAS 4000 imaging system (GE) or film exposure.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Western Blot Analysis of EMT Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analysis was performed as previously described.36 The antibodies used in the present study were as follows: PRMT5 (1:1000), Vimentin (1:1000), Snail (1:1000), LATS2 (1:1000), p‐YAP (S127) (1:1000), E‐cadherin (1:1000) and GAPDH (1:1000) were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology. YY1 (1:300), MMP9 (1:1000) and Cyclin D1 (1:500) were from Proteintech. YAP (1:2000) was provided by Abcam. Signals were detected using Chemi Dox XRS instrument plus Image lab software (BIO‐RAD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Head and Neck Cancer Cell Lines

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CAL27 cells were obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA). UM-SCC-74B cell line was obtained from the laboratory of Dr. Thomas E. Carey at the University of Michigan.[50 (link)] The identity of both the tumor cell lines was confirmed by STR genotyping (AmpFLSTR Identifiler Kit, Applied Biosystems, Carlsband, CA). The tumor cell lines were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum containing 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and 1% Non-essential amino acids. Recombinant IL-6 was obtained from PeproTech (Rocky Hill, NJ). Primary antibodies against PRMT5 and Lamin/AC were purchased from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA) and GAPDH was purchased from Millipore (Billerica, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blotting for Protein Detection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting assay was performed as described previously [38 (link)]. The following antibodies were used: Flag (cat. no. ab49763; abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), HA (cat. no. ab1265; abcam), Myc (cat. no. ab9106; abcam), GAPDH (cat. no. 60004–1-Ig; Proteintech, Chicago, IL, USA), NONO (cat. no. 611279; BD Bioscience, Franklin lakes, NJ, USA), PRMT1 (cat. no. 2449; Cell Signaling Technology, CST, Beverly, MA, USA), PRMT5 (cat. no. D160716; Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China), pan-ADMA (cat. no. 13522; CST), pan-MMA (cat. no. 8015; CST). Images were captured with ChemiDocTM Imaging System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), and the band intensity were analyzed using Image J software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Modifications

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extracts were resolved through 10–15% SDS-PAGE, transferred to NC membranes, and probed with primary antibodies. Peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse or rabbit antibody was used as secondary antibody, and the antigen–antibody reaction was visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence assay. The following commercial antibodies were used: β-actin (cat. no. 3700; Cell Signaling Technology), PRMT5 (cat. no. 79998; Cell Signaling Technology), LDHA (cat. no. 3582; Cell Signaling Technology), H3R8me2s (cat. no. ab272149; Abcam), and H4R3me2s (cat. no. ab194696; Abcam).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor Microarrays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor microarrays (TMA) were obtained from the MD Anderson Tissue Bank after consent and approval from the Institutional Review Board at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center and used for immunohistochemistry as described elsewhere [36 (link)]. The following antibodies were used for immunohistochemistry staining using the Dako Autostainer with appropriate positive and negative controls: PRMT5 (Cell Signaling Technology), H4R3me2s (Sigma), and Ki67 (Invitrogen). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) images were semi-quantitated for 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (DAB) intensity using ImageJ (Fiji). The correlation between the indicated protein levels was determined by the Pearson chi-square test. P values were determined by chi-square test (F), or Student’s t test using the Prism software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!