The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Synapse vincent software

Manufactured by Fujifilm
Sourced in Japan

SYNAPSE VINCENT software is a digital imaging and information management system designed for medical facilities. It provides tools for storing, retrieving, and managing medical images and associated data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

31 protocols using synapse vincent software

1

Bayesian U-Net for Flexible Phantom Segmentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Because of the physical flexibility of the materials of which the calibration phantom is composed, the phantom deforms under the patient's weight (Fig. 1b). Thus, though the same model of calibration phantom was used throughout the study, segmentation of the CT image using a simple rigid 3D phantom model definition was not possible. Instead, we employed Bayesian U-Net [11], a convolutional neural network for semantic segmentation. For the training dataset, we randomly selected 40 cases (20 cases from each hospital), and in each image, the calibration phantom was manually segmented using Synapse Vincent software (v4.4, Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microbiome Profiling in Sarcopenic Liver Disease

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this single-center study, 69 patients with HCV antibody/HBs antigen-positive chronic liver disease were classified into two groups based on their SMI and compared for their microbiome and its predictive functional profiling. SMI was calculated based on the muscle mass area at the L3 vertebral level using the SYNAPSE VINCENT software (Fujifilm Medical, Tokyo, Japan). The microbiome was sequenced via MiSeq, and the results were compared with LEfSe32 (link) and PICRUSt233 .
The Research Ethics Committee of Nagoya University Hospital (protocol number 2015–0420, August 30, 2016) approved our research, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients before enrolment in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. This study was registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Register (UMIN ID: 002,020,269). All clinical and stool sample information was anonymized, and a database was constructed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analysis of Tumor ADC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Magnetic resonance imaging scans were conducted using a Signa HDe or Signa Explorer 1.5‐T scanner (GE Healthcare) with an eight‐channel phased‐array coil. Fast spin‐echo T2‐weighted images (T2W) and DWI (b = 0, 20, 800 s/mm2) were obtained. The mean ADC values (×10−3 mm2/s) of tumors were measured in regions of interest (ROI) with manual tracing from ADC maps using Synapse Vincent software (FujiFilm Medical), which automatically calculates the mean, minimum, and maximum values that are displayed as a free‐form green line (Figure 1). The mean ADC value chosen was consistent with the literature. ROIs included most of the areas of the homogeneous solid portions of tumors while avoiding the most peripheral portions to exclude partial‐volume effects of adjacent uninvolved tissues.29 In multiple metastasis cases, we measured its greatest diameter in the axial plane on non‐contrast T1W images. When the tumor had a necrotic component, conventional T2W, DWI, and contrast‐enhanced T1W images were used, avoiding cystic or necrotic parts.30 We used the median ADC value (1.27 × 10−3 mm2/s) as the cut‐off to divide patients into ADC‐high (n = 30) and ADC‐low (n = 30) groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of Pericardial Fat Volume

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pericardial fat volume was assessed using contrast-enhanced images on reconstructed three-dimensional views as previously published [5] (link), [19] (link). Quantitative measurements of PAT volume were performed using SYNAPSE VINCENT software (Fujifilm Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Cross-sectional axial images between 15 mm above and 30 mm below the left main coronary artery were selected as the region of interest (ROI) for the analysis, because this area includes the pericardial fat located around the proximal coronary arteries (left main coronary, left anterior descending, right coronary, and circumflex arteries). The anterior border of the pericardial fat volume was defined by the chest wall and the posterior border was delineated by the chest and the bronchus. Pericardial fat includes both epicardial (located within the pericardium) and paracardial fat (superficial to the pericardium) [4] (link). Within the ROI, we defined contiguous voxels with the CT attenuation between −190 HU and − 30 HU as adipose tissue, which is automatically identified within the ROI by the software. The software also calculated the voxel volume and mean CT density of the PAT (CTPAT) (Supplemental figure).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Muscle Composition Assessment via CT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used SYNAPSE VINCENT software (Fujifilm Medical, Tokyo, Japan), enhanced or plain cross-sectional CT images taken for the practical purpose of diagnosing, staging or follow-up assessment, and CT attenuation values at the level of transverse process of lumbar vertebra L3. The bilateral psoas muscle area, VFA and SFA were automatically identified and then manually corrected. The multifidus muscles area was manually traced. PMI (cm2/m2), IMAC and VSR were calculated by dividing psoas muscle area (cm2) by the square of the patient’s height (m2) [15 (link)], the CT attenuation value (Hounsfield Unit, HU) of the bilateral multifidus muscles by that (HU) of four circles with the diameter of 6 mm on subcutaneous fat away from major vessels [16 (link)], and VFA by SFA, respectively. Representative CT images are shown in Figure 1. Reviewing the previous Japanese studies, as the sex-specific cut-off points for PMI, IMAC and VSR, we pre-defined 6.36 cm2/m2 for men and 3.92 cm2/m2 for women [15 (link)], and -0.358 for men and -0.229 for women [17 (link)], and 1.33 for men and 0.93 for women [18 (link)], respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Airway Segmentation and Luminal Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Airway segmentation and airway luminal area measurements were obtained using SYNAPSE VINCENT software (FUJIFILM Medical, Tokyo, Japan)5. The segmental bronchus was defined as the 3rd generation airway. Following automatic luminal segmentation of the airway tree, all branches of the 3rd to 6th generation airways in all segments were manually identified by tracking from the 3rd to the 6th generation [5 (link), 21 (link)]. For each branch, cross-sectional images perpendicular to the longitudinal center line of the lumen were generated, and the lumen areas and internal diameters in the middle third portion were automatically measured and averaged. The mean lumen area for each generation airway was calculated in all segments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Thoracic CT Evaluation of Muscle Mass

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thoracic CT was performed for the evaluation of muscle mass11 (link). CT was performed with 1 mm to 5 mm-thick samples at slice intervals of 1 mm to 5 mm. We analyzed single-slice axial CT images captured at the sum of the cross-sectional areas of the major and minor pectoralis muscles at the top of the aortic arch as the pectoralis muscles areas. By contrast, muscle areas at the 12th thoracic vertebra were measured as the erector spinae to assess the muscle mass. Muscle areas at the aortic arch and Th12 level were semi-automatically defined using SYNAPSE VINCENT™ software (Fujifilm Medical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and the muscle area was quantified based on the CT hounsfield unit (HU) range, i.e., − 29 HU to + 150 HU. W assessed the change in muscle mass following 6 months and 1 year from the first evaluation. The measurements were performed five times to confirm the accuracy of CT measurement; the average value of five measurements was recorded.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Sarcopenia and Obesity in Cancer Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients underwent abdominal/pelvic computed tomography (CT) at least twice: at the time of cancer diagnosis and just before surgery. The cross‐sectional areas of the right and left psoas muscles (psoas muscle area: PMA) at the middle level of the third lumbar vertebra were measured using SYNAPSE VINCENT software (Fujifilm Co., Tokyo, Japan). The border of the psoas muscle was manually outlined and quantified using a Hounsfield unit threshold from −29 to +150.18 The PMA value just before surgery was divided by that at the time of cancer diagnosis, and the resulting value was defined as the rate of change in PMA (CPMA) (Figure 2). According to the median CPMA, patients were divided into the preoperative skeletal muscle wasting and no‐change groups. The clinicopathological factors, as well as the short‐ and long‐term outcomes of the two groups, were compared. The measured PMA was normalized according to height using the following equation: normalized PMA, defined as the psoas muscle mass index (PMI, cm2/m2) = measured PMA (cm2)/height (m2). The cutoff level of sarcopenia in PMI value was 6.36 cm2/m2 for males and 3.92 cm2/m2 for females.19 Obesity was defined as body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg2/m2.20 Sarcopenic obesity was defined as patients with both sarcopenia and obesity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantifying Abdominal Body Composition from CT Scans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Computed tomography (CT) scans of the abdomen were performed during each patient’s periodic check-up. Each patient was imaged in the supine position and the thickness of each slice was 1.0mm. Axial CT images were used for muscle and fat mass evaluations at the level of the third lumber spine [14 (link)]. The abdominal muscle area (AMA), abdominal subcutaneous fat area (ASFA), and abdominal visceral fat area (AVFA) were automatically measured using SYNAPSE VINCENT software (version 3.0, Fujifilm Medical, Tokyo, Japan), which enables the tissue segmentation using Hounsfield unit thresholds [15 (link)]. To avoid the potentially confounding influence of body size, we also adjusted AMA, ASFA, and AVFA by dividing by the height of each patient (AMA/height, ASFA/height, and AVFA/height, respectively) [16 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

3D-reconstruction of Hepatic Vasculature

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3D-reconstruction of the hepatic vasculature was made using data from a contrast enhanced multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) and SYNAPSE VINCENT software (Fuji Film Medical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). The volumetry of each segment was performed by "portal segmentation function" of SYNAPSE VINCENT. The volumetry in LDLT was performed before LDLT from the donors and 1 month and 6 months after LDLT (Figure 1). In the surrogate model, the volumetry was performed as well before operation and 1 month and 6 months after operations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!