The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

37 protocols using zen 2012 blue edition

1

Measuring Drosophila Larval Size and Adult Weight

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Larvae were picked up from fruit vials and were transferred into a glass spot plate containing water. The larvae were then heat-killed by microwaving for 10 s. The bodies of the larvae straightened out after microwaving and were arranged and photographed on a slide under an Amscope MU300 microscope (Amscope, Irvine, CA). A ruler was set beside the larvae as a reference. Newly emerged flies were collected and weighed on a Mettler Toledo XS3DU microbalance (Mettler Toledo, Greifensee, Switzerland). Flies that emerged from the sucrose food were weighed in pairs, and the weight of each adult was calculated afterward. Flies from the microbe rescue and nutrition rescue experiments were weighed individually. Quantification of wing length was performed as previously described (86 (link)). In brief, one wing from each emerged fly was removed and wings from the same treatment were positioned under a coverslip on a glass slide. The pictures were taken using ×10 magnification and a Zeiss Axio Observer Z1 microscope and measured with ZEN 2012 (blue edition) (Carl Zeiss, Inc., Oberkochen, Germany). Wing length was measured as the linear distance from the intersection of the anterior cross vein to the wing margin at the distal end of the third longitudinal vein. Both female and male wings were cut and measured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fluorescent Autophagy Monitoring in IPEC-J2 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IPEC-J2 cells were transiently transfected with pmCherry-EGFP-LC3 24 h prior to virus infection. IPEC-J2 cells were transfected with pLVX-mitomCherry-IRES-EGFPLC3B or pLVX-mito-mCherry and cultured 1 week in DMEM/10% FBS containing 3 μg/mL puromycin. Cells were grown on coverslips and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for observation with a Zeiss LSM710 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany), the images were analyzed using ZEN 2012 (Blue edition) (Carl Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microscopic Imaging of Cellular Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The histological sections and immunohistochemically labeled specimens were examined using an epifluorescence microscope (Axiophot; Zeiss, Oberkochen, West Germany) equipped with an Olympus digital camera system (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and a digital acquisition system (DP 70; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Double-labeled specimens were viewed using an optical and epifluorescence microscope (Axio Imager M2, Carl Zeiss Microscopy GmbH, Jena, Germany) equipped with a digital camera system (AxioCam MRm, Carl Zeiss) and a digital acquisition system (ZEN 2012 blue edition, Carl Zeiss). Confocal images of Iba1/Gal-3 and Gal-3/CRALBP labelings were obtained using a Nikon A1 Confocal on a Ti-E microscope (Nikon, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan) and processed using NIS-Elements (Nikon, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan). Photographs for panels were taken centrally. Images were viewed and processed using Photoshop (Adobe Systems, Mountain View, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Senescence Markers Evaluation in MSCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MSCs senescence was evaluated by the expression of the DNA damage marker H2AX (1:200; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) using Western blot, while SA-ß-GAL activity of MSCs was measured using a Cellular Senescence Activity Assay kit (Enzo Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY, USA) following the vendor’s protocol. p21 and p16 immunofluorescent staining was performed following standard protocols20 (link), using primary antibodies: p16 (ab118459), mouse monoclonal (cell line JC8), Santa Cruz (SC-56330, Santa Cruz, CA, USA); p21, rabbit polyclonal (c19), Santa Cruz (SC-397). The percentage of the positively stained area was quantified using ZEN® 2012 blue edition (ZEISS, Munich, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Live-cell Imaging on Confocal Microscope

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The culture plates were inserted into an on-stage incubator on a Zeiss LSM780 confocal microscope at 37°C and 5% CO2. The time-lapse images were captured at 5-20 min intervals and processed with ZEN 2012 (blue edition) (Zeiss), Huygens Professional (Scientific Volume Imaging) and Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunofluorescent Staining of Chicken Enteroids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immuno-fluorescent staining, chicken 2D enteroids were grown on 2% Matrigel (Corning) coated transwell inserts (VWR, 0.33 cm2) in 24 well plates (Orr et al., 2021 (link)) while 3D enteroids were grown as outlined above. Chicken 2D and 3D enteroids were treated with WT or ΔprgH STm, LPS or media alone as outlined above. At 4 and 8 h post-treatment, cells were gently washed with PBS and fixed with 4% w/v paraformaldehyde (TFS) for 15 min at room temperature and blocked with 5% v/v goat serum in permeabilization buffer (0.5% w/v bovine serum albumin and 0.1% w/v Saponin in PBS; Sigma-Aldrich). Permeabilization buffer was used to dilute all antibodies. Cells were stained with mouse anti-human ZO-1 (Abcam, IgG1, clone A12) overnight at 4°C followed by the secondary antibody, goat anti-mouse IgG1 Alexa Fluor®594 (TFS) for 2 h on ice. Cells were counterstained with Hoechst 33,258 and Phalloidin Alexa Fluor®647 (TFS) to stain for nuclei and F-actin, respectively. Slides were mounted using ProLong™ Diamond Antifade medium (TFS). Controls comprising of secondary antibody alone were prepared for each sample. Images and Z-stacks were captured using an inverted LSM880 (Zeiss) with 40X and 63X oil lenses using ZEN 2012 (Black Edition) software and were analyzed using ZEN 2012 (Blue Edition). Z-stack modeling was performed using IMARIS software (V9).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Co-localization of TfR1 and PEDV in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine whether TfR1 and PEDV co-localize, IPEC-J2 cells and Vero cells seeded on cover slips in 24-well tissue culture plates and infected with PEDV for 1 h at 4°C, rinsed, then incubated at 37°C. At various times post infection cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min, rinsed, then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min, rinsed again then blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin. Cells were incubated with primary antibodies (1:100) overnight at 4°C. Cells were then rinsed and incubated with fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:200) for 30 min at room temperature, washed again three times with PBS and incubated with 1 ug/ml DAPI for 5 min. Images were captured using a Zeiss LSM710 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany) and analyzed using ZEN 2012 (Blue edition) (Carl Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Live-cell Fluorescence Imaging of HepG2 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For live-cell fluorescence imaging microscopy, HepG2 cells were seeded on glass-bottom dishes and transfected with plasmid DNA. Twenty four hours post transfection, fresh medium was applied and cells were monitored by confocal microscope. For on-line investigations, representative cells or cell groups were selected and maintained in buffered medium at 37 °C. Concurrently with treatments, live-cell imaging was started at a rate of one picture per minute. Typically, single treatment experiments were finalised after 15 min and combined treatment experiments after 20 min. Microscopic analyses and image acquisitions were done on an LSM 700 confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss Jena GmbH, Jena, Germany), using ZEN 2012 blue edition and ZEN 2011 black edition software (Carl Zeiss Jena GmbH). Data were analysed and graphed using Microsoft Excel and Prism Software (Graph Pad, La Jolla, CA, USA). Statistical analysis was done using two-way ANOVA and either Dunnett’s or Sidak’s multiple comparisons test. α = 0.05; **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Visualizing SA Outer Layer Formation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The formation of the SA outer layer was confirmed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM; LSM 700, Carl Zeiss, Ulm, Germany), using the software ZEN 2012 (Blue Edition, Carl Zeiss, Ulm, Germany). 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein (0.5 mL, 25 mM) was incorporated in the outer infeed of SA. The microparticles were placed onto a microscope slide, covered with a cover glass and subjected to the excitation wavelength of 5(6)-carboxyfluorescein (490 nm), while the fluorescent signal was collected at 520 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Kidney Tubular Injury and Fibrosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tubular injury was assessed in 5-μm mid-hilar cross-sections of the kidney stained with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) (Eirin et al., 2012 (link)). Tubular injury, including dilation, atrophy, cast formation, cell detachment, or thickening of tubular basement membrane, was scored from 1 to 5. We defined 0 as normal tubules, 1: < 10% of tubules injured, 2: 10–25%, 3: 26–50%, 4: 51–75%, and 5: > 75% of tubules injured. Tubulo-interstitial fibrosis was assessed in trichrome stained slides using a computer-aided image analysis program (ZEN® 2012 blue edition, Carl ZEISS). In each slide, trichrome staining was semi-automatically quantified in a blinded manner in 15–20 fields, expressed as fraction of kidney surface area, and the results from all fields averaged (Eirin et al., 2011 (link); Chade et al., 2004 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!