The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lab tek 2 chamber slide

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Denmark, Japan, Israel, Germany

Lab-Tek II chamber slides are a type of laboratory equipment used for cell culture applications. They provide a controlled environment for growing and observing cells. The slides feature removable chambers that allow for media exchange and cell manipulation. Lab-Tek II chamber slides are designed to facilitate microscopic examination of cells.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

269 protocols using lab tek 2 chamber slide

1

Spermatheca Immunofluorescence Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sperm isolated from testes were incubated in Lab-TekII Chamber Slide (Cat. 154534, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) with RPMI 1640 medium for 30 min to adhere and then stained in MitoTracker Red CMXRos (0.5 μM, Cat.M7512-50, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) for 30 min. After fixation in 4% paraformaldehyde (Cat. E672002-0500, BBI, China) for 30 min and immersion in 0.5% Triton X-100 for 10 min, sperm were blocked in 3% BSA solution for 1 h at room temperature. Subsequently, they were stained with mouse anti-LAP1 antibody (1:500) and then Alexa Fluor 488 conjugated anti-mouse secondary antibody (1:2000) (Cat. A11001, Invitrogen™, USA). Hoechst 33258 (Cat. H3569, Invitrogen™, USA) was used to stain the nucleus at a final concentration of 2 μg/mL. Fluorescence was captured by Zeiss Zen 2010 software (version 6.0, Zeiss, Germany) using a confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 710, Germany). For the immunofluorescence of spermatheca, tissue adhered to Lab-TekII Chamber Slide (Cat. 154534, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The methods of fixation, permeabilization, blocking, and incubation were the same as above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Gamma-labeled Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles for DNA Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MDA-MB-231 cells (1 × 104 cells/well) were seeded on a Lab-Tek II Chamber Slide (cat# 154453, ThermoFisher Scientific). After 24 h, cold MSNs and 68Ga-MSNs (4.5 μg/mL) were prepared and used to label the cells. As a positive control, MDA-MB-231 cells were treated to 3 Gy and 6 Gy of X-ray radiation (225 kVp; X-RAD SmART irradiator, Precision X-Ray Inc). One hour after completion of these procedures, the cells were fixed in 4% formaldehyde and stained with anti-phospho-histone H2A.X (Ser139) antibody (1:100; cat# 05-636, Sigma-Aldrich) overnight at 4°C. Secondary staining was performed using anti-mouse Alexa Fluor 488 antibody (1:100; cat# A-21202, ThermoFisher Scientific). Staining was imaged by fluorescence microscopy (EVOS FL; and DMi8, Leica Microsystems). Mean fluorescence intensity per cell was quantified using ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Measure Mitochondrial Membrane Potential

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mitochondrial membrane potential was measured using JC-1 dye. JC-1 exhibits potential-dependent accumulation in mitochondria with a fluorescence emission shift from green (~529 nm) to red (~590 nm). Briefly, HT22 cells were grown on Lab-Tek II Chamber Slide (Thermo Scientific) and incubated with JC-1 dye (5 µg/ml). JC-1 was excited at 488 nm and emission of JC-1 monomer (depolarized) and J-aggregate (polarized mitochondria) forms were captured at 525/50 and 605/75 nm, respectively, with Nikon laser-scanning confocal microscope (Nikon Eclipse C1). To avoid the photobleaching, laser power was attenuated to the minimal level. Minimum three fields per group were captured to determine the changes in mitochondrial membrane potential. Carbonylcyanide p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP 5 µM) was used as a control to dissipate mitochondrial potential.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

AvIR-Mediated Phototoxicity Assessment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phototoxic effect of AvIR was assessed by using the LIVE/DEAD Cell Imaging Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cells were seeded onto an 8-well Lab-Tek II chamber slide (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at a density of 10,000 cells/well 1 day before AvIR-PIT. The next day, the cells were treated by adding biotinylated anti-CEA (Bio-CEA), biotinylated anti-EpCAM (Bio-EpCAM) (5 µg/ml), or an equal volume of DPBS for 30 min, followed by adding AvIR (5 µg/ml) with another incubation for 30 min. The cells were exposed to NIR light (3 J/cm2) from a light-emitting diode (LED) light source (Shiokaze Giken, Niigata, Japan), which emits red light with a peak at 690 nm. The irradiation energy density was measured with a PM100D optical power meter (Thorlabs, Tokyo, Japan). The irradiated cells were incubated with a mixture of Live Green and Dead Red solutions for 20 min and were subsequently imaged using a fluorescence microscope BZ-9000 (Keyence, Osaka, Japan). To assess the target specificity, AvIR-mediated PIT was also performed for co-cultured CHO-CEA and CHO-EpCAM cells. The CHO-CEA cells were stained with CellTracker Blue dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and were co-cultured with unlabeled CHO-EpCAM cells in a Lab-Tek II chamber on the day before AvIR-PIT.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

PBDE Exposure in Human Neural Progenitor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experimental data was obtained from Schreiber et al. (2010) (link). To determine the neurological effects of PBDEs, primary human fetal neural progenitor cells (hNPCs) were cultivated in the form of neurospheres and exposed to BDE-47. Neurospheres were exposed to BDE-47 over a period of 7 days, with half the medium (with a chemical concentration of 1 μM) being refreshed every second day. Exposure occurs in the Lab-Tek II Chamber slide (Thermo Fisher Scientific), which has a flat, square-based format. Culture area is reported at 0.7 cm2/well, with a total well volume of 907 μl and a working volume of 500 μl.
The medium used in these experiments was a mixture of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) and Ham’s F12 (3:1) with no supplementation with additional serum. Fischer et al. (2017) (link) determined the lipid and protein concentrations within the DMEM solution as approximately 0.2 ml/L and 0.75 (0.69–0.86) ml/L respectively. The bulk medium in the model simulations was therefore parameterized to match these volume fractions. Again, we simulated the potential influence of other dissolved organics on the distribution of the chemical following the same approach as described in Case study 1. The partitioning properties compiled for BDE-47 are summarized in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quercetin Effects on 3D Cell Culture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Lab-Tek® II Chamber slide (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA) was
pre-coated with a 70 μl Matrigel matrix and polymerization was allowed for in a
37°C incubator for 10 to 15 minutes. Cells in the growth medium mixed with the
indicated concentration 0 or 10 μM of quercetin and 2% Matrigel matrix were
transferred onto the chamber slide. Once the gel was polymerized, cells were
allowed to grow with the changing media every other day for 6 days. Colony
formation was photographed under 200× magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Glutaraldehyde Fixation and Embedding for TEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells grown in the Lab-Tek II chamber slide (Thermo ScientificTM, 154941) were fixed with 5% glutaraldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich, G5582) for 2 h at 4°C and washed with PBS for three times and proceeded for dehydration. Dehydration was performed in graded concentration of ethanol (Sigma-Aldrich, 1.07017) from 25%, 50%, 75%, 95% to 100% for 10 min and a final 10 min incubation with 100% acetone (Sigma-Aldrich, 179124). Cells are infiltrated in 100% acetone: resin (1:6) overnight at room temperature and incubated at 80°C oven for 4 h. The embedded cells were trimmed, sectioned, and imagined by TEM (JEOL 1400FLASH TEM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying MeCP2 Expression in AAV-Transduced Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were plated at 30,000 cells per well in 8-well Lab-Tek II chamber slide (Thermo Fisher Scientific) 24 h prior to transduction. 24 h after plating, cells were transduced with AAVHSC7-226 at a MOI: 150,000. Before staining, cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde 48 h after transduction. They were then rinsed 3-times with PBS and blocked with PBS containing 3% BSA and 0.3% Triton X-100 for 1 h at room temperature. This was followed by incubation with primary anti-MeCP2 antibody (1: 100 dilution; Cell Signaling, #3456) and an anti-GFP antibody (1:500 dilution, Thermo Fisher, # MA5-15256) in PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.3% Triton X-100 at 4°C overnight. The cells were then rinsed 3-times with PBS and incubated with secondary antibodies. Secondary antibodies used were anti-rabbit Alexa Fluor-555 IgG (1:500, cell Signaling, #4413) and anti-mouse Alexa Fluor-488 IgG (1:500, cell Signaling, #4408) in PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.3% Triton X-100 for 2 h at room temperature in dark. The cells were finally rinsed 3-times with PBS, mounted with antifade reagent containing DAPI (VECTASHIELD Vibrance®, #H-1800) and visualized at ×40 magnification using the Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Imaging Macrophage and Acinar Cell Activation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
THP1 Macrophages and NS-SV-TTAC Acinar Cells were plated on an 8-well Lab-Tek II Chamber Slide (Thermo Scientific, 154534). After indicated treatment, cells were loaded with Quant-iT PicoGreen Reagent (1:50) (Invitrogen, #P7589A) and MitoTracker Red CMXRos (Invitrogen, #M7512) (1:10000) and incubated for 45 minutes at 37°C. The cells were fixed for 20 minutes at room temperature in 4% PFA. The cells were blocked in 3% BSA diluted in 1X PBS for 1 hour. Cells were washed with 1X PBS and then stained with primary antibodies overnight and then stained by secondary antibodies for 1 hour at room temperature (Supplemental Table 2). Images were acquired on Nikon A1 HD (Nikon) confocal microscope and processed with CellProfiler in ImageJ (Broad Institute).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

SPTAN1 Knockdown Impacts YAP and MLC in MCF10A Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MCF10A cells were cultured in DMEM/F12 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California) supplemented with 5% horse serum, 20 ng/ml EGF, 0.5 µg/ml hydrocortisone, 10 µg/ml insulin, 100 ng/ml cholera toxin, and 50 µg/ml penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were maintained in a 37°C incubator at 5% CO2. Cells were cultured on Lab-Tek II Chamber Slide (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts) to 80–85% confluent, and then siRNA transfections were performed twice using Lipofectamine RNAiMAX Reagent with a 24-hr interval. Cells were processed for immunoblotting or immunofluorescence 96 hr post-transfection. SMARTpool siRNA oligonucleotides toward human SPTAN1 and Non-Targeting siRNA Pool #2 (control siRNA) were purchased from GE Dharmacon (Lafayette, Colorado). For immunostaining, cells were fixed and stained following standard method using anti-YAP antibody (Novus, 1:300 dilution) and anti-p-MLC antibody (1:10, Cell Signaling Technologies, Beverly, Massachusetts). Western blotting was done using antibodies against following proteins: pYAP127 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technologies); pYAP381 (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technologies); YAP (1:200, Sigma, St. Louis, Missouri); MLC (1:1000, Cell Signaling Technologies); SPTAN1 (1:500, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, Texas); and beta-actin (1:200, Sigma).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!