The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Automacs cell separator

Manufactured by Miltenyi Biotec
Sourced in Germany

The AutoMACS Pro Separator is a magnetic cell separation instrument designed for automated, reproducible, and high-throughput cell isolation. It utilizes magnetic beads coated with specific antibodies to selectively capture and separate target cells from complex samples, such as blood or tissues. The instrument provides a consistent and efficient cell separation process, making it a valuable tool for applications in immunology, stem cell research, and cell-based therapies.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

29 protocols using automacs cell separator

1

Comprehensive Immune Cell Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A single cell suspension was generated from spleens or thymus. Cell surface staining was performed with the following directly conjugated anti–murine antibodies (from BD Bioscience or eBioscience unless otherwise specified): anti-CD4 (RM4-5), -CD8 (53-6.7), -CD19 (1D3), -CD25 (7D4), -CD44 (IM7), -CD45.1 (A20), -CD45.2 (104), -CD62L (MEL-14), -CD69 (H1.2F3), -CD101 (IGSF2), -CD103 (2E7), -ICOS (7E.17G9). For intracellular staining, cells were surface stained and then permeabilized with FixPerm buffer (eBioscience). Cells were then washed and stained with antibodies against Foxp3 (FJK-16s), -GFP (life Technology). For IFNγ (XMG1.2) staining, cells were stimulated for 4 hours with cell stimulation cocktail plus protein transport inhibitor (eBioscience) and stained intracellularly. A kit to detect active pan-caspase was purchased from eBioscience. 1×106/ml splenocytes were stained with FITC-Z-VAD-FMK or APC-Z-VAD-FMK for 45 minutes in a 37°C incubator with 5% CO2. The data were acquired on an LSRII instrument (BD Bioscience) and analyzed using FlowJo software (TreeStar). For cell sorting experiments, cells were labeled with anti-CD4 (L3T4) beads and purified on the AutoMACS Cell Separator (Miltenyi Biotec), stained for desired cell surface markers, and sorted using a FACSAria flow cytometers (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolation and Purification of CD4+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For discovery and validation cohorts, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs)
were isolated using a standard Ficoll (GE Healthcare) and sodium
citrate–containing preparation tubes (Becton Dickinson) procedures,
respectively. Sorting of the CD4+ T cells was performed on a
MoFlo cell sorter (Beckman Coulter) and an autoMACS® cell
separator (Miltenyi Biotec), respectively. Extraction of genomic DNA was carried
out using GenElute Mammalian Genomic DNA Miniprep kit (Sigma-Aldrich). RNA was
isolated using standard TRIzol protocol (Invitrogen) and Allprep Total RNA/DNA
Kit (Qiagen), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Isolation of CD4+ and CD8+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD4+ T cells and CD8+ T cells were isolated from whole blood from MS patients and healthy controls as described previously [33 (link)]. Briefly, 64 ml of whole blood was collected in EDTA coated vacuum tubes (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) were separated from EDTA-blood, washed and resuspended in ice cold PBS (Life Technologies, Paisley, UK) following centrifugation. CD8+ microBeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Lund, Sweden) were added to PBMCs and positively isolated using autoMACS cell separator (Miltenyi Biotec) and a positive selection program. CD4+ T cells were then isolated from the negative fraction using CD4+ negative selection microBeads (Miltenyi Biotec) and the negative selection program. Cell purity was assessed by flow cytometry as described [33 (link)], and the CD4+ and CD8+ T cell fractions were > 95% pure. For each cell type, 2x106 cells were stored in RNA protect (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) at -80°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mixed Lymphocyte Reaction Assay in Humanized Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human CD3+ lymphocytes as responder cells were isolated from spleens of humanized NSG mice using either a MACS human CD3 MicroBead Kit (Miltenyi Biotec, GlodBach, Germany) or an autoMACS™ Cell Separator (Miltenyi Biotec) according to the manufacturer's instructions. MLR assay was performed by previously reported methods8 (link). Briefly, stimulator cells were prepared from PBMCs of healthy human volunteers (n = 3) and irradiated at 30 Gy. Then 2 × 105 hCD3+ responder cells purified from the humanized mice were plated in triplicate into a 96-well U-bottom plate and incubated without or with irradiated 4 × 105 stimulator cells. After 3 days, MTT assay was performed to check cell proliferation according to the manufacture's instruction (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

PBMC Isolation and Cell Sorting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For discovery and validation cohorts peripheral blood mononuclear cells
(PBMCs) were isolated using a standard Ficoll (GE Healthcare) and sodium
citrate-containing preparation tubes (Becton Dickinson) procedures,
respectively. Sorting of the CD4+ T cells was performed on a
MoFlo™ cell sorter (Beckman Coulter) and an autoMACS®cell separator (Miltenyi Biotec), respectively. Extraction of genomic DNA was
carried out using GenElute Mammalian Genomic DNA Miniprep kit (Sigma-Aldrich).
RNA was isolated using standard TRIzol protocol (Invitrogen) and Allprep Total
RNA/DNA Kit (Qiagen), respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation of Fetal and Postnatal Murine Lung Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the preparation of donor murine lung cells, E13.5, E15.5, E18.5 fetal lungs and P7, P14, P56 mouse lungs were collected and minced with a sterile razor. Minced lungs were dissociated with Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM; Sigma-Aldrich) with 0.96 mg/mL dispase II (Roche), 0.2% collagenase (Wako Pure Chemical Industries), and 20 kU/mL DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich) solution as previously described39 (link). After a 60-min incubation at 37 °C, cells were filtered through a 70-µm cell strainer (BD Biosciences), and washed with DMEM supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum. Erythrocytes were removed by Percoll gradient (70%) centrifugation (GE Healthcare) for 20 min at room temperature (1,000 × g). Single-cell suspensions were further incubated with Ter119-biotinylated (1:200; clone TER-119; BD Biosciences) antibody for 20 min (4 °C), followed by anti-biotin MACS beads (Miltenyi) for 20 min (4 °C). Incubated cells were depleted of erythrocytes through negative selection using an AutoMACS cell separator (Miltenyi Biotech). Resulting propidium iodide staining negative cells were counted using Flow-Count fluorospheres (Beckman Coulter) and a Gallios flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Investigating Ezh2 Deficiency in T Cell-Mediated Colitis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CD4+ T cells were enriched from the spleen and lymph nodes of control (Ezh2fl/fl) and Ezh−/− (Cd4 Cre; Ezh2fl/fl) mice with an AutoMACS cell separator (Miltenyi Biotec), stained with PerCP Cy5.5 anti-CD4, FITC anti-CD25, and PE anti-CD45RB (all obtained from BD Biosciences), and naive CD4+ CD25 CD45RBhi T cells were purified (>99%) by cell sorting (Moflo,Dako Cytomation or FACSAria, BD Biosciences). CD4+GFP+CD25+NRP1+ tTreg cells were purified from Ezh2fl/flFoxp3-GFP mice or Cd4 Cre; Ezh2fl/flFoxp3-GFP. CD4+CD45RBhiCD25 naive T cells (4 × 105) from control mice and Ezh2-deficient mice were injected intravenously (i.v.) into age- and sex-matched Rag2−/− mice and intestinal inflammation was monitored. Alternatively, Rag2−/− mice were coinjected with 4 × 105 naive T cells and 1 × 105 CD4+CD45RBloCD25+ Treg cells from control mice and Ezh2-deficient mice. Mice were sacrificed at 7 weeks when significant weight loss occurred in the control groups. Gut cells were isolated as described previously by intracellular staining. Sections of the proximal, mid-, and distal colon were fixed in buffered 10% formalin and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) (Histoserv).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Isolation and Characterization of α4β7+ PBMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen PBMCs from study days −1, 5, and 7 were thawed, washed, and suspended at 1 × 107 cells/ml in complete RPMI medium prior to incubation with an Alexa Fluor 647 (AF647)-conjugated anti-α4β7 monoclonal antibody (Act-1; NIH AIDS Reagent Program) for 10 min at 4 ± 2°C, protected from light. After washing, the cells were incubated with anti-AF647 MicroBeads (Miltenyi) for 15 min at 4 ± 2°C, protected from light. PBMCs were then washed and passed through a 30-μm cell strainer prior to separation of α4β7-positive and -negative PBMC populations using a Miltenyi AutoMACS cell separator. Both the α4β7+ and α4β7 populations were adjusted to 5 × 106 cells/ml and cultured as described above to collect α4β7+ and α4β7 ALS. Immediately prior to ALS culture, 100 μl of both the α4β7+ and α4β7 populations was removed to assess population purity by flow cytometry. As α4β7+ cells were bound by the AF647-conjugated anti-α4β7 monoclonal antibody, it was expected that only the positive population would fluoresce when analyzed by flow cytometry. The α4β7+ and α4β7 populations for a given volunteer and time point were analyzed using a FACSCanto II flow cytometer and determined to be ≥90% pure postseparation (data not shown).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Stepwise Differentiation of Lens Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A three-stage differentiation protocol was used to generate heterogeneous cultures containing lens cells (Yang et al., 2010 (link)). Growth factors were sourced from Miltenyi Biotec and Peprotech, and the base medium for each stage was DMEM:F12 (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Initial modification of this protocol involved increasing the concentration of noggin to 500 ng/ml and including 10 nM SB431542 in the stage 1 medium, followed by reducing the concentration of FGF2 to 10 ng/ml in stage 3. For purification of ROR1+ cells via magnetic cell separation, single-cell suspensions were obtained using TrypLE (Thermo Fisher Scientific) during stage 2 of the lens differentiation protocol. The cells were then incubated with a biotinylated anti-human ROR1 antibody (BioScientific; AF2000) and labelled cells purified using anti-biotin microbeads and an autoMACS cell separator (Miltenyi Biotec). Purified ROR1+ cells were plated on Matrigel-coated dishes in M199 medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 10 ng/ml of FGF2 or in test media (TM) consisting of M199 and combinations of the following growth factors: BMP4/BMP7 (20 ng/ml each); EGF/TGFα (5 ng/ml each); HGF (10 ng/ml); IGF1/insulin (10 ng/ml and 10 µg/ml); and PDGF-AA (10 ng/ml). All four human pluripotent stem cell lines (two embryonic and two induced pluripotent) tested behaved similarly.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunomodulation of Tumor Progression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti-IFNγ63 (link) (250 µg) was injected i.p. every 7 d beginning 1 d prior to tumor implantation. LTβR-Ig fusion protein25 (link) (100 µg) was injected i.p. every 4 d, beginning 1 d prior to tumor implantation. NK cells were depleted by injection of 100 µg anti-NK1.1 (PK136, BioXcell) every 3 d beginning 3 d prior to tumor implantation. For repletion of Rag−/− mice, CD8 T-cells purified from pooled LN and spleen by magnetic bead enrichment on an autoMACS Cell Separator (Miltenyi Biotec) (5×106 cells) were injected i.v. ~3 d prior to tumor implantation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!