The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using rabbit monoclonal anti perk

1

Western Blot Analysis of ER Stress Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates were mixed with Laemmli buffer plus dithiothreitol (DTT), heated for 5 min at 95 °C, and loaded onto SDS-PAGE (sodium dodecyl sulfate—polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis) gels. The gels were run in Tris–Glycine SDS running buffer and then transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. Blocking consisted of at 5% skim milk or 2.5% BSA, depending on the primary antibody used. Imaging was performed using the Li-Cor Odyssey fluorescence imaging system. Primary antibodies consisted of: monoclonal mouse anti-6xHis-Tag (Invitrogen, MA1-21315; 1:4000), polyclonal rabbit anti-ATF6 (Novus Biologicals, NBP1-75478; 1:1000), monoclonal rabbit anti-BiP (Cell Signaling Technology, C50B12; 1:1000), monoclonal rabbit anti-Calnexin (Cell Signaling Technology, C5C9; 1:1000), monoclonal rabbit anti-COG5 (Sigma-Aldrich, SAB4200440; 1:600), monoclonal mouse anti-GAPDH (Invitrogen, ZG003; 1:4000), monoclonal mouse anti-GFP (Cell Signaling Technology, 2955S; 1:1000), polyclonal rabbit anti-IRE1a (Cell Signaling Technology, 3294S; 1:1000), monoclonal rabbit anti-PDI (Cell Signaling Technology, 2446S; 1:1000), and monoclonal rabbit anti-PERK (Cell Signaling Technology, D11A8; 1:1000). Secondary antibodies consisted of: Donkey anti-Rabbit IRDye 680, Donkey anti-Rabbit IRDye 800, Donkey anti-Mouse IRDye 680, and Donkey anti-Mouse IRDye 800 (Li-Cor; 1:20,000).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

PERK Knockdown Efficiency in Perk-deficient Neurons

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To determine PERK knockdown efficiency in genetic Perk knockout neurons, mouse cerebral cortex was isolated from day 0 Perk-floxed Nestin-Cre pups, and homogenized mechanically in ice-cold buffer (100 mM HEPES, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM DTT, supplemented with 1X protease inhibitor and 1X phosphatase inhibitor cocktails; pH was adjusted to 7.0 before use) using a polypropylene pestle. Tissue lysates for western blot were prepared using RIPA buffer with 1X protease inhibitor and 1X phosphatase inhibitor cocktails. Samples were denatured by boiling in 2X Laemmli buffer for 5 min. The following primary antibodies were used in western blot analysis: monoclonal rabbit anti-PERK (Cell Signaling), monoclonal mouse anti-β-actin (GenScript).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tissue Microarray Analysis of Cancer Dormancy Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TMA was used for the analysis of the expression of cancer dormancy markers, including NR2F1, NANOG, MIG6, and PERK. TMAs were generated as described below. Tissue samples from endoscopic biopsy were fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 24–48 h, and then embedded in paraffin. The representative cores (2 mm in diameter) were isolated from the individual paraffin blocks and arranged in new tissue array blocks using a trephine apparatus (Superbiochips Laboratories, Seoul, Korea). Included cases had tumors occupying more than 10% of the core area. The TMA blocks contained up to 60 cores. The 4 μm sections from TMA blocks were stained with the following primary antibodies—rabbit monoclonal anti-NR2F1 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA); rabbit monoclonal anti-NANOG (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA); rabbit polyclonal anti-MIG6 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA); and rabbit monoclonal anti-PERK (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). Immunostaining was performed using the BenchMark XT platform (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The intensity of expression was interpreted as 0, 1+, 2+, and 3+. Intensity of 2+ or 3+ in at least 10% tumor cells was defined as positive expression; that of 0 or 1+ was defined as negative expression (Figure 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of UPR Pathway Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were incubated as described abovefor 24 h or submitted to the siRNA procedure for 48 h. Then western blotting was performed as described previously [24 (link)]. HUVEC homogenates were run on using sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS)-polyacrilamide gel electrophoresis. Proteins were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes, incubated with primary mouse monoclonal anti-ATF6, rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-IRE1α (Ser724), mouse monoclonal anti-CHOP (Novus Biological, Cambridge, UK), rabbit monoclonal anti-phospho-PERK(Thr981), rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-IRE1α (Ser724), mouse monoclonal anti-CHOP (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), rabbit monoclonal anti-PERK (Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA), rabbit polyclonal anti-IRE1α (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and mouse monoclonal anti-β-actin (Sigma-Aldrich, Barcelona, Spain) antibodies overnight and with the correspondent secondary peroxidase-conjugated antibodies. Antibody binding was detected by an ECL system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Amersham, UK) and densitometric analysis was performed using Scion Image-Release Beta 4.02 software (http://www.scioncorp.com).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Apoptosis Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rabbit polyclonal anti‐ELOVL6 (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA), mouse monoclonal anti‐SCD1 (Abcam Tokyo, Japan), rabbit polyclonal anti‐PARP, mouse monoclonal anti‐caspase‐3, rabbit polyclonal anti‐cleaved caspase‐3, rabbit monoclonal anti‐PERK, rabbit monoclonal anti‐phospho‐PERK, and rabbit monoclonal anti‐beta‐actin for an internal standard (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA) were used. Immunoreactive proteins were detected using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (GE Healthcare, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, UK) and an LAS‐3000 Luminescent Image Analyzer (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!