The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using xevo tq s triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer

1

UPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Orelabrutinib

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chromatographic analysis was performed using a Waters ultra performance liquid chromatography system consisted of a Waters Xevo TQ-S triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (Milford, MA, United States) and a Waters ACQUITY UPLC I-Class system (Milford, MA, United States). An Acquity BEH C18 chromatographic column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.7 μm) was used with the flow rate of 0.40 ml/min. In addition, other conditions were set as follows: injection volume of 1.0 μl, autosampler temperature of 10°C, column temperature of 40°C. The mobile phases were constituted of 0.1% formic acid in water (solution A) and acetonitrile (solution B) with a gradient elution as below: 0–0.5 min, 90% A; 0.5–1.0 min 90–10% A; 1.0–1.4 min, 10% A; and 1.4–1.5 min, 10–90% A. 90% A was then maintained at 1.5–3.0 min to reach equilibrium. The entire run time was 3.0 min.
A Waters Xevo TQ-S triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer was coupled with electrospray ionization (ESI) in positive ion mode for mass spectrometry. Measurements were conducted by multiple reaction monitoring (MRM), and the ion transitions for orelabrutinib and IS were m/z 427.95→410.97 and m/z 418.99→295.97, respectively. Data acquisition, data processing and instrument control were performed using Masslynx 4.1 software (Waters Corp, Milford, MA, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Analysis of Abexinostat via UPLC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quantitative analysis was performed using a UPLC-MS/MS system consisting of a Waters Xevo TQ-S triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer and a Waters ACQUITY UPLC I-Class system (Milford, MA, USA) used in this experiment. Accurate molecular weight calculations were achieved using an electrospray ionization (ESI) source (Milford, MA, USA) with ultra-high sensitivity. The system was chromatographed on an Acquity BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.7 μm; Milford, MA, USA) at 40 °C with acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid as mobile phases. Gradient elution was as follows: 0 − 0.5 min (acetonitrile, 10%) and 0.5–1.0 min (acetonitrile, 10–90%), 1.0–1.4 min (acetonitrile, 90%) and 1.4–1.5 min (acetonitrile, 90–10%) at 0.40 mL/min. Finally, the mobile phase was maintained 10% acetonitrile between 1.5 and 2.0 min for equilibration. A 2.0 μL sample was drawn from each vial as the injection volume, and the entire analysis process time was 2.0 min. In UPLC-MS/MS, we used positive ion mode to detect abexinostat and IS with ion transition of m/z 397.93 → 200.19 and 422.01 → 186.11, respectively. 25 eV and 30 V were the collision energy and cone voltage for both.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Optimized LC-MS/MS for Quantitative Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC-MS/MS system consisted of an Acquity UPLC I class system coupled to a Xevo TQ-S triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA), which was operated with a positive/negative ESI source in multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. The MS/MS parameters were set as follows: capillary voltage, 0.6 kV; source temperature, 150 °C; desolvation temperature, 500 °C; desolvation gas flow, 800 L/h; cone gas flow, 150 L/h; and collision gas flow, 0.15 mL/min. The Intellistart feature in Waters MassLynx software (version 4.2 SCN986, Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) was used for determining the most intense MRM transitions and optimizing the cone voltages and collision energies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

UPLC-MS/MS Analytical Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The UPLC instrument was Waters ACQUITY H-Class system which consisted of the following: Quaternary solvent manager, Sample manager-flow through needle, High temperature column heater with active pre-heating. The mass spectrometry was Waters Xevo TQ-S triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer, and the ionization source was electrospray ionization source (ESI source).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

UPLC-MS/MS Quantification of Analytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The UPLC-MS/MS system consisted of an ACQUITY I-Class UPLC system and an XEVO TQ-S triple-quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) equipped with an ESI source. Chromatographic separation was performed using a UPLC BEN C18 column (2.1 × 50 mm, 1.7 m; Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) at 40 °C. The mobile phase consisted of water containing 0.2% formic acid (B) and acetonitrile containing 0.2% formic acid (A) delivered at 0.3 mL/min as a gradient as follows: 0–0.5 min, 10% A; 0.5–3 min, 90% A; 3–4 min, 90% A; 4–4.5 min, 10% A; 4.5–5 min, 10% A. Waters XEVO TQ-S triple-quadrupole mass spectrometer equipped with an ESI source was used for the mass analysis and detection. All analytes were quantified in the MRM mode, and the optimised MS parameters are listed in Table 8. The main working parameters were set as follows: source temperature, 120 °C; desolvation temperature, 350 °C; and nebuliser gas (N2), 650 L/h. The scan time for all analytes was set at 0.2 s and acquisition and processing were conducted on a Micromass Masslynx4.1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Determination of Compounds via Mass Spectrometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectrometric detection was carried out using a Waters Xevo TQ-S triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (Waters Corp., Milford, MA, USA) with an ESI interface. The ESI source was operated in negative-ionization mode. The optimal ESI source parameters for the analytes were as follows: capillary voltage 3.0 kV, source temperature 150 °C, desolvation temperature 350 °C, and desolvation and cone gas at a flow rate of 700 and 150 L/h, respectively. For the collision induced dissociation (CID), argon was used as the collision gas at a flow rate of 0.13 mL/min. Quantitation was carried out in the selected ion recording mode and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode. Transition reactions and other parameters of the analytes are given in Table 1.

Parameters of SRM mode used for determination.

Table 1
Compoundsmonitoring modeRetention time (min)m/z of precursor ion (Da)m/z of product ion (Da)Cone voltage (eV)Collision voltage (eV)
Compound 1MRM0.91168.92125.085814
Compound 2MRM0.70331.07169.042918
Compound 3MRM1.64203.05116.284618
Compound 4MRM1.90399.05191.006025
Compound 5MRM2.10183.00124.03520
Compound 6MRM3.48287.05268.79512
Compound 7SIR4.13939.10
Compound 8MRM3.73609.17300.151640
Compound 9MRM5.82301.05151.05520
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Carnitine in Insect Fat

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Measurement of carnitine in the fat body were performed by using ultra‐high‐performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC‐MS/MS). The fat bodies from two larvae at the L3 stage were used per sample and samples were processed according to previous description (Nishida et al, 2021 (link)). The detection was carried out on a XEVO TQ‐S triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer coupled with electrospray ionization source (Waters). Precursor ion was scanned at m/z (MH+: 162.073 > 102.825 for Carnitine) by multiple reaction monitoring and established methods using individual authentic compounds and biological samples. The peak area of a target metabolite was analyzed using MassLynx 4.1 software (Waters). The insoluble pellets were heat‐denatured with 0.2 N NaOH and used to quantify total protein using a BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

UPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Waters ACQUITY UPLC instrument was used for the chromatographic analysis. Chromatographic separation was performed on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (50 mm × 2.1 mm, 1.7 μm) and a pre-column. Then, The temperature of the column chamber was maintained at 40°C, the autosampler (FTN) was set at 10°C, the temperature of the sample chamber was 4°C, the injection volume was 2 μL, and the flow rate was constant at 0.3 mL/min. Gradient elution was performed using 0.1% formic acid and acetonitrile as the mobile phases; the gradient elution procedure is presented in Table 1.
Finally, a positive ion scan was performed in multiple reaction-monitoring (MRM) acquisition modes in combination with a Waters Xevo TQ-S triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (Milford, MA, USA) and an electrospray ionization source (ESI). The parameters and data of the MS/MS system acquired using Masslynx 4.1 software (Milford, Massachusetts, USA) are presented in Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

UPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Derazantinib

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A Waters Xevo TQ-S triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (Milford, MA, USA) and a Waters ACQUITY UPLC I-Class system (Milford, MA, USA) constituted this UPLC-MS/MS system, which used electrospray ionization (ESI) source. In the experiment, 0.1% formic acid solution and acetonitrile were used as the mobile phase in the instrument, and the model of the column was ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (2.1 mm × 50 mm, 1.7 μm). A gradient elution was used to separate derazantinib and IS, and the linear gradient elution procedure was as follows: 0–0.5 min (10% acetonitrile was eluted at a flow rate of 0.30 mL/min); 0.5–1.0 min (acetonitrile, 10–90%); 1.0–1.4 min (acetonitrile, 90%) and 1.4–1.5 min (acetonitrile, 90–10%). The single injection volume was 2 μL, and the single analysis time was 2.0 min. In addition, the injection temperature was 10 °C, and the column temperature was 40 °C.
A Xevo TQ-S triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer was used for mass spectrometry monitoring, combined with an ACQUITY UPLC system for analysis. In positive ion mode, the collision energy of derazantinib and IS were 25 eV and 15 eV, respectively, and the cone voltage were 20 V and 30 V, respectively. In addition, the selective reaction monitoring (SRM) modes of ion transitions of derazantinib and IS were m/z 468.96 → 382.00 and m/z 488.01 → 400.98, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Targeted Metabolomics Profiling of Serum, Muscle, and WAT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Targeted and semi-quantitative metabolomics analyses were performed on a Waters Xevo TQ-S triple quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer coupled to the ultra-pressure liquid chromatography (UPLC-MS) platform using the previously published protocol in FIMM (Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland) [25 ]. Briefly, metabolites were extracted from 100 μL serum, 20 mg muscle, and 20 mg WAT samples respectively using protein precipitation by adding acetonitrile +1% formic acid. The collected extracts were dispensed in Ostro 96-well plates (Waters Corporation, Milford, USA) and filtered by applying a vacuum at a delta pressure of 300–400 mbar for 2.5 min on robot’s vacuum station. Filtered sample extract (5 μL) was injected in an Acquity UPLC system coupled to a Xevo TQ-S triple quadrupole mass spectrometer (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) which was operated in both positive and negative polarities with switching time of 20 ms. Multiple Reaction Monitoring (MRM) acquisition mode was selected for the quantification of metabolites. MassLynx 4.1 software was used for data acquisition, data handling, and instrument control. Data processing was done using TargetLynx 4.1 software. Eighty-nine metabolites in serum, 71 in muscle, and 71 in WAT were identified in whole samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!