The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Fei tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The FEI Tecnai 12 is a transmission electron microscope (TEM) designed for high-resolution imaging and analysis of materials at the nanoscale. It features a LaB6 electron source, a maximum accelerating voltage of 120 kV, and a resolution of up to 0.34 nm. The Tecnai 12 is capable of performing various imaging modes, including bright-field, dark-field, and high-resolution TEM, as well as selected-area electron diffraction analysis.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using fei tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope

1

Negative Staining of Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Negative stain treatment covers the sample with a layer of heavy metal salts so this contrast allows visualization of the sample surface. 5 μL  of S-EVs were resuspended in PBS containing 4% Paraformaldehyde (1:1) to fix them. The sample was applied to formvar 100-mesh grids and incubated for 10 min. Grids were washed twice with filtered distilled water and stained using 1.5% UA in water for 10 min. After they were washed with water to remove the excess staining solution and grids were air-dried. Images were acquired from grids using a FEI Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope (FEI Company, Hillsboro, Oregon, USA) equipped with a Veleta CCD digital camera (Olympus Soft Imaging Solutions GmbH, Münster, Germany) and operating at 120 kV. Images were collected at magnifications of 21000X, 30000X and 68000X.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Negative Stain Electron Microscopy of DMPC Nanodiscs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electron Microscopy (EM) was performed according to Hagn et al. [25 (link)]. DMPC nanodiscs were diluted in Ca2+ free 10 mM Tris pH 8, 100 mM NaCl to a final concentration of 0.025 mM, and adsorbed to glow-discharged, carbon-coated 300 mesh EM grids. Samples were then prepared by conventional negative staining with 1% (w/v) uranylacetate. EM images were collected with an FEI Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope (FEI Company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) equipped with a LaB6 filament and operated at an acceleration voltage of 120 kV. Images were then recorded with a Gatan 2 × 2 k CCD camera (Gatan, Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA) at 42000× and a defocus value of ~1.5 μm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

TEM Characterization of Gold Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) was used to obtain quantitative measurements of particle size, distribution, and morphology. Samples for TEM were prepared by adding 5-10 μL of sample aqueous solution on copper grids supported by 300 mesh carbon film. The grids were air dried at room temperature. Gold nanomaterials were examined under the FEI Tecnai12 transmission electron microscope (FEI, Hillsboro, Oregon) operating at an accelerating voltage of 120 kV. Images were acquired using a Gatan 2k × 2k cooled CCD camera (Gatan, Pleasanton, CA). UV-Vis-NIR spectra were recorded on a Genesys 10S UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) using quartz cuvettes with an optical path of 1 cm. Distilled water was recorded as the control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ultrastructural Analysis of Stretched TA Muscle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TA muscles were longitudinally stretched and fixed overnight at 4°C with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) and 2% formaldehyde (Sigma-Aldrich) in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer pH 7.4, and postfixed for 2 h at 4°C with 1% osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer. After three water washes, samples were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series and embedded in an epoxy resin (Sigma-Aldrich). Ultrathin sections (60–70 nm) were obtained with an Ultrotome V (LKB) ultramicrotome, counterstained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate. Images were acquired with a FEI Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope (FEI Company) operating at 100 kV and equipped with a Veleta CCD digital camera (Olympus Soft Imaging System).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A 4 μL of undiluted EV sample (SEC‐enriched EVs from human pooled plasma and PDAC patient plasma) or 1:2 diluted recombinant EV reference material, rEVs (Millipore Sigma, Cat# SAE0193‐1VL; Burlington, MA, USA) (Geeurickx et al., 2019 (link)) was adsorbed onto glow discharged, carbon‐coated 200 mesh electron microscopy grids for 5 min. The grids were then sequentially washed in deionized (DI) water three times for 30 s and were contrasted with 1% (w/v) uranyl acetate solution three times for 10 s. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were acquired on an FEI Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific) at an acceleration voltage of 120 kV using LaB6 filament. The images were captured with a Gatan 2 k × 2 k CCD camera (Gatan; Pleasanton, CA, USA). The 4 × 4 μm 8‐bit TEM images were converted into 16‐bit images in ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, version 1.53t) and analysed using the TEM ExosomeAnalyzer software (version Aug 13, 2018) (Kotrbová et al., 2019 (link)), where individual EVs were outlined using the manual editing tool. The diameter and roundness of detected EVs were determined by the automatic analysis module, and EVs within the size range of 30–400 nm were considered. Samples from three independent repeats were analysed (in total 928 EVs were detected).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

High-Pressure Freezing and Freeze Substitution of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Infected cells on 3 mm sapphire glass coverslips were frozen in a Bal-tec HPM010 HPF according to [34 (link)] before being transferred to a pre-cooled (−160 °C) automatic freeze substitution unit (AFS, Leica Microsystems, Milton Keynes, UK) and allowed to warm to −90 °C over a period of 3.5 h. FS protocol has been described elsewhere [34 (link)]. Briefly, cold (−90 °C) freeze substitution medium containing 0.2% uranyl acetate in acetone was carefully added to the samples and left for 60 min before warming to −50 °C. Samples were taken through a graded series of resin concentrations (Lowicryl HM20, Agar Scientific, Stansted, UK, in acetone), placed in Leica flat embedding moulds (cells facing upwards) and polymerized under UV light at −50 °C for 48 h and room temperature for a further 48 h. Thin sections (60 nm) of the resulting resin blocks were cut (Leica Microsystems, UC6 ultramicrotome, Milton Keynes, UK) and imaged at 100 kV in a FEI Tecnai12 transmission electron microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with Tietz F216 2K × 2K CCD camera (TVIPS, Munich, Germany) after counter staining with uranyl acetate and lead citrate (EM Stain, Leica Microsystems, Milton Keynes, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Corneal Ultrastructure Visualization via SBF-SEM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Corneas were processed for serial block-face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM) as described previously in detail (24). Briefly, the corneas were fixed in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer containing 2.5% glutaraldehyde, post-stained with heavy metals (Fe, OsO4, uranyl acetate, lead) before dehydration through an acetone series and embedding in Embed 812 resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatsfield, PA, USA) containing Ketjenblack EC600JD (Lion Specialty Chemicals Co., Tokyo, Japan). The resin-embedded blocks were sputter-coated with gold to reduce charging during block-face imaging. Tissue blocks were sectioned at 100 nm using a Gatan 3View2 system (Gatan, Pleasanton, CA, USA) mounted to a Mira 3 scanning electron microscope (Tescan, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). In some cases, platelets within the injured cornea were immunogold labeled and imaged using an FEI Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope (ThermoFisher, Sugarland, TX, USA). These corneas were initially fixed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 2% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton-X 100 and sequentially labeled with a platelet-specific primary rat anti-CD42b antibody (10 µg/mL; InVitrogen, ebioscience, Carlsband, CA, USA) followed by a secondary goat-anti-rat IgG antibody conjugated to 5 nm gold particles (Nanoprobes, Yaphank, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transmission Electron Microscopy Imaging of Extracellular Vesicles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
4 μL of EVs were absorbed to glow discharged, carbon-coated 200 mesh EM grids. Grids were washed in Milli-Q water three times for 20 seconds followed by conventional negative staining with 1% (w/v) uranyl acetate. Images were collected using an FEI Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific) equipped with a LaB6 filament and operated at an acceleration voltage of 120 kV. Images were recorded with a Gatan 2 k × 2 k CCD camera (Gatan, Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA) at a magnification of 11,000X and a defocus value of ~1.5 μm.
Images from three independent preparations were processed using custom MATLAB code to extract EV sizes from TEM images. Images were first binarized with an intensity threshold adjusted to account for the brightness of each image. Detected objects smaller than 800 pixels and those that were not roughly circular were removed. Remaining objects were then morphologically closed and filled. EV area was determined by integrating the number of pixels, given a 0.95 nm pixel size. Diameters were taken to be 2√(Area/π).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Negative Staining for Transmission Electron Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specimens at certain concentrations were absorbed to glow-discharged, carbon-coated 200 meshEM grids. Samples were prepared by conventional negative staining with 1% (w/v) uranyl acetate. Electron microscopy (EM) images were collected with an FEI Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with a LaB6 filament and operated at an acceleration voltage of 120 kV. Images were recorded with a Gatan 2 × 2 k CCD camera (Gatan; Pleasanton, CA, USA) at a magnification of 100 μm and a defocus value of ∼1.5 μm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunogold Labeling of Virus-Like Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
VLPs were subjected to immunogold labeling. The procedures were adapted from a previous published method [38 (link)]. A total of 4 μL of diluted samples was incubated on glow-discharged EM grids (FCF300-Ni; Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) for 5 min at room temperature. The grids were incubated on droplets of 20 mM glycine for 10-min, followed by a 30-min blocking in 5% bovine serum albumin in PBS without calcium chloride, without magnesium chloride (DPBS, [−] Ca, [−] Mg). The grids were floated onto 30 μL droplets of palivizumab (1:50) or Motavizumab (40 μg/mL) in 5% BSA in DPBS ([−] Ca, [−] Mg) overnight at 4 °C. After three washes with 1% BSA in DPBS ([−] Ca, [−] Mg), 5-min per wash, the grids were placed on 30 μL of droplets of 6-nm gold beads conjugated with goat anti-human polyclonal IgG antibody (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA) at 1:100 dilution in 5% BSA in DPBS ([−] Ca, [−] Mg), for 1-h at room temperature. Then the grids were washed three times with 1% BSA in DPBS ([−] Ca, [−] Mg), and stained with 1% PTA (pH 6~7), as described above. The negative-stain grids were imaged in low-dose mode (50 e/Å), using a FEI Tecnai 12 transmission electron microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific, previously FEI, Hillsboro, OR) at 120 kV, images were acquired on a 4k × 4k Gatan OneView Camera (Pleasanton, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!