The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

73 protocols using metacore

1

Pathway Analysis of siRNA Screening

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The top hits in the siRNA screen were functionally grouped according to Gene Ontology (GO) terms and functional pathways as clustered by Metacore (Clarivate Analytics) software. The criteria used to identify “disease-related genes” followed the standards of Metacore (Clarivate Analytics) software. Cytoscape (version 3.6.1) with the Enrichment Map application (version 3.1.0) was used for visualization. Interactions among the genes were assessed using the STRING database (https://string-db.org/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Enrichment Analysis of Transcriptomic and Proteomic Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For bulk RNA-seq data, GSEA was performed based on genes ranked in order of log2FC and the functional WikiPathways (www.wikipathways.org) database via WEB-based GEne SeT AnaLysis Toolkit (WebGestalt) (70 (link)). Only significant (FDR < 0.05) pathway categories with 10 to 500 genes were considered for enrichment analyses. For proteomics and integrated transcriptomic-proteomic datasets, enrichment analysis was performed based on significant DEGs/DEPs (|log2FC| > 1, adjusted P < 0.05) in Metacore (Metacore/">https://clarivate.com/products/Metacore/; Clarivate Analytics, London, UK). Only significant (FDR < 0.05) prebuilt process networks were presented. Up-regulated and down-regulated process networks are shown using −log10(FDR) and log10(FDR), respectively. For bulk RNA-seq data comparison between Pax7-nGFP+ iMPCs and Pax7-nGFP+ myoblasts, ORA was performed using the R package goseq v1.42.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Enrichment Analysis of Myocarditis Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MetaCoreTM version 20.3 build 70,200 [15 ] from Clarivate Analytics is a database of manually composed ontologies mapped to canonical pathways and networks. We used this database for purposes of enrichment analysis in pathway maps. Pathway maps in MetaCoreTM are defined as subsets of functionally connected genes to describe a specific cellular process in a specific cellular context. Herein, the enrichment analysis is performed by examining the intersection between a gene list of myocarditis biomarkers extracted from MetaCoreTM, and the prebuilt pathway maps in MetaCoreTM using the hypergeometric mean, which takes into account the number of objects in your dataset, the number of objects in the intersecting map and the number of objects in the entire database. This assessment returns a p-value that tells us the likelihood that the intersection between the gene signature and a particular map is obtained purely by chance. We set the p-value threshold at 0.05; rejecting all hypotheses/pathway maps that have enrichment p-values higher than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Enrichment analyses for fasting insulin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Enrichment analyses for gene ontologies were performed using MetaCoreTM (Clarivate Analytics) on the SNPs that compose the fasting insulin rPRS. Furthermore, gene-based enrichment analyses were performed in FUMA1 (MacArthur et al., 2017 (link); Watanabe et al., 2017 (link); Aguet et al., 2019 (link)) after mapping the SNPs composing the fasting insulin rPRS to genes with the biomaRt package in R (Durinck et al., 2005 (link), Durinck et al., 2009 (link)). We also used GeneMANIA (Warde-Farley et al., 2010 (link)) to determine if the genes were part of a network. Specifically, the gene list derived from the fasting insulin rPRS is entered in GeneMANIA. GeneMANIA then extracts linked mRNA expression data from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and connects co-expressed data to form functional association networks. The node sizes represent gene scores indicating the number of paths that start at a given gene node and end up in one of the query genes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Nonparametric Statistical Analysis of Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical significance of nonparametric data was analyzed by Mann–Whitney U-Test. Data represent mean ±1 SD. Calculations were performed using Minitab® v16 (Minitab Inc. USA). Network and Pathway data analysis was performed using Key Pathway Advisor and MetacoreTM (Clarivate Analytics, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Maternal EPDS-vCpG Profiling for Fetal Gender

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 2417 and 3619 unique genes mapped from the maternal EPDS-vCpGs bearing female fetus and EPDS-vCpGs from female fetus-facing placenta tissues were respectively imported into MetaCoreTM (v21.1.70400; Clarivate Analytics) for pathway enrichment and transcription factor analyses. 25,641 and 25, 281 unique genes mapped from the vCpGs of both maternal blood and placenta sources were used respectively as the reference list. P-values for transcription factor analyses were determined using hypergeometric intersection.
Each input gene mapped from maternal EPDS-vCpGs bearing female fetuses was also queried against previously associated phenotypes using FUMA (Watanabe et al., 2017 (link)). FUMA was also used to examine the up-regulated expression of these genes mapped from EPDS-vCpGs, relative to genes mapped from vCpGs, in specific tissues based on GTex v8 RNA-seq data (GTEx Consortium and Ardlie, 2015 (link)). Bonferroni corrected p-values were provided for the up-regulated differentially expressed gene sets from FUMA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Enrichment Analysis of Genetic Scores

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Biological interpretation of genes that comprised our genetic score was performed using enrichment analysis using MetaCoreTM (Clarivate Analytics). The enrichment identifies statistically significant pathway maps and gene ontology processes associated with this list of genes after false discovery rate (FDR) correction, to summarize the most enriched and pertinent biology associated with the set of genes under investigation (Huang et al., 2009 (link)). We also performed enrichment analysis to identify genes differentially expressed at different developmental phases, via functional mapping of genetic and expression using the FUMA tool (Watanabe et al., 2017 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Transcriptomic Analysis of Differential Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The library preparation, sequencing, and read mapping to the reference genome were performed by the Genomics Platform at the University of Geneva (Switzerland) as described in supplementary material and methods.
The differential expression analysis was performed using R/Bioconductor package edgeR v.3.18.1. Paired t-test was used to assess the differentially expressed genes (DEG) and pvalues were corrected for multiple testing errors with 5% false discovery rate (FDR) according to Benjamini-Hochberg (BH).
The Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID) v6.8 was used for functional analysis of DEG and Gene Ontology (GO) database queried for DEG with FDR < 0.05 and log fold change (logFC) ≤2 or ≥ 2. The Functional Annotation Clustering method was used to perform cluster analysis, selecting high classification stringency. Pathway and network analysis was performed using MetaCore TM (Cortellis Solution software; Clarivate Analytics, London, United Kingdom) or g:GOSt ( g: profiler, by ELIXIR) with an FDR < 0.05. Row data are stored under GSE168312.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Gene Expression Profiling of Acquired TKI Resistance in ccRCC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The methods for gene expression profiling and integrated DEG analysis have been described previously [1 (link)2 (link)]. Briefly, the 20 matched pairs of pre- and post-TKI treatment tumor samples from the 10 patients were used for expression profiling of the acquired resistance cohort. Their differential gene expression between paired pre- and post-TKI tumor samples was analyzed with the empirical Bayes moderated paired t-test using R package limma.
To overcome the limitation of the small number (10) of cases in our acquired resistance cohort, we used a public dataset (GSE76068) generated from a ccRCC patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model [15 (link)]. We also used GEPIA, which provides gene expression analysis based on tumor and normal samples from the TCGA and the GTEx databases. Functional transcriptome analyses were performed using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) and MetaCore (Clarivate Analytics) software with default settings.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Transcriptional Profiling of HT29-MTX Cells in Response to MRx0518 Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HT29-MTX cells were cultured in 24-well Transwell® (Corning, Corning, NY, USA), and incubated with treatments of MRx0518LV, MRx0518HK and MRx0518SN at a MOI of 100:1 (or equivalent) for 3 h at 37 °C under anaerobic conditions. Cells were washed and lysed, and RNA was isolated from lysate using an RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RNA was converted to cDNA using a GeneChip™ High Throughput WT PLUS Kit, which was then hybridized to a GeneChip™ Human Transcriptome Array 2.0. Microarray chips were washed and stained using a GeneChip™ Fluidics Station 450 instrument and the GeneChip™ Expression Wash, Stain and Scan kit, and then scanned using a GeneChip™ Scanner 3000 instrument (Thermo Fischer Scientific). Data analysis was carried out using Transcriptome Analysis Console 4.0 software (Thermo Fischer Scientific). Data were normalized using the Robust Multiarray Average algorithm, and fold changes were calculated using the normalized log2-transformed values of treated cells relative to respective controls. Data were filtered using cut-offs of p < 0.05, fold change of <−1.5 and ≥1.5, and the presence of a gene symbol and coding variants. Pathway analysis was carried out using MetaCore™ (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!