The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

26 protocols using bioscope resolve afm

1

Atomic Force Microscopy for Leaf Cell Stiffness

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For AFM imaging, the LPI6 leaves of 6-wk-old plants were cut into 3 × 3-mm2 discs and immersed into 0.55 M mannitol for 1 h. The leaf blocks were fixed onto a glass slide using nail polish and submerged under a drop of 0.55 M mannitol at room temperature while imaging. A silicon nitride cantilever (ScanAsyst-Fluid, Bruker) with a nominal spring constant of 0.7 N/m and a nominal tip radius of 20 nm was used and calibrated by thermal tuning on a glass substrate before each measurement. Young's modulus images were obtained with a commercial AFM BioScope Resolve (Bruker) under PeakForce Quantitative Nanoscale Mechanical (QNM) mode at 64 × 64 pixels with setpoint force 50 nN at 0.5 Hz. The AFM data were processed and analyzed with NanoScope Analysis software (Bruker, version 1.8) and ImageJ software. The stiffness quantification around the stomatal circumference in the polar regions and outer radial walls was conducted as described for COS488 signal quantification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

AFM-based Single-Cell Elasticity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The AFM force spectroscopy assays were performed using a commercial AFM BioScope Resolve (Bruker) in a fluid at 24 °C. A colloidal probe (NanoAndMore, CP-PNPL-SiO-E−5, 0.08 N/m) with a glass sphere of 15 nm diameter was used and calibrated via thermal tuning on a glass substrate before each measurement. The force curves were captured in a force volume mode at a scan size of 1 μm, ramp rate of 1 Hz, ramp size of 15 μm, and a deflection error trigger threshold of 100 nm (n = 3). To extrapolate the apparent Young's modulus with a sample Poisson's ratio of 0.5, the force curves were treated with a Hertz model in the Nanoscope Analysis software (Bruker).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Nanomechanical Characterization of Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM force spectroscopy experiments were performed with the operation mode of PeakForce QNM in Fluid available on a commercial AFM BioScope Re¬solve (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). Force mappings were obtained using a silicon nitride probe (PFQNM-LC-A-CAL, Bruker) with pre-calibrated spring constant of 0.091 N/m, tip height of 17 μm, and tip radius of 65 nm. Deflection sensitivity of the cantilever was calculated by thermal tune. Force curves were captured by Force Volume mode with scan size of 500 nm, ramps/line of 4, ramp rate of 1 Hz, ramp size of 1.5 μm and deflection error trigger threshold of 6 nm. All force curves were treated with Sneddon model in Nanoscope Analysis software (Bruker) to extrapolate the apparent Young's modulus with tip half angle of 18° and sample possion's ratio of 0.5. All experiments were done at room temperature in ECM within 1 h. Above16 force mappings were obtained per sample, and 30 different samples were analyzed for each condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Atomic Force Microscopy of Cyclic DNA Dimers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples in the assembly buffer {DNA: 45 mM Tris (pH 8.0), 20 mM MgCl2; protein-DNA conjugate: 20 mM Hepes [4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid, pH 7.0], 20 mM MgCl2} were directly dropped onto freshly cleaved mica and incubated for 30 min at room temperature before imaging. All AFM images were captured in fluid, using PeakForce Tapping mode on a Bruker Bioscope Resolve AFM equipped with PeakForce-Hirs-F-B (Bruker). The imaging buffer was the same as the respective assembly buffer to avoid changes in product distribution due to varying solvent or salt conditions. The effective imaging force (<80 pN) was continuously adjusted to minimize sample damage and probe manipulation. The images were flattened using NanoScope Analysis (Bruker) to remove tilt and bow. The bending angles of cyclic dimers were measured in NanoScope Analysis (Bruker). Lines were drawn over the DNA strands visualized, and the angles between strands on the opposite side of the fraying ends were measured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of ZIF-8 Coated Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After each step, the bottom of the plate well was cut and glued onto a glass slide for AFM imaging in air. AFM images were collected using a BioScope Resolve AFM (Bruker) in a ScanAsyst mode by using ScanAsyst-Air cantilevers (Bruker). The Raman spectra were acquired on plate well bottom before and after ZIF-8 coating by a Foram X3 Raman spectrometer with a 40× objective and a 532 nm diode laser as an illumination source. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis of plate well bottom before and after ZIF-8 coating were conducted with a Bruker D8-Advance X-ray powder diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) with scattering angles (2θ) of 5−30°.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

AFM Topographic Imaging of LHP ANC Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM topographic images of LHP ANCs thin film was captured using the Bruker BioScope Resolve AFM using PeakForce Tapping mode in combination with ScanAsyst automatic parameter adjustment functionality. The topographic AFM images were captured using a 1 nm ultra-sharp probe with a peak force amplitude of 50 nm, peak force set-point of 0.1 nN, and a scan rate of 1.4 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

MDCK Cell Surface Imaging by AFM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Atomic force microscopy was performed in HEPES‐Ringer buffer at room temperature in PeakForce Tapping mode using a BioScope Resolve AFM (Bruker Nano Surfaces, Santa Barbara, CA, USA). A PeakForce QNM‐Live Cell (PFQNM‐LC) probe (Bruker AFM Probes, Camarillo, CA, USA) (tip length 17 µm, tip radius 65 nm, opening angle 15°) was used to image the cell surface. The spring constant of the cantilever was determined with a vibrometer (OFV‐551, Polytec, Waldbronn, Germany) and found to be 0.0611 N/m. The glass bottom Petri dish in which the MDCK cells were grown was held down through the use of vacuum that has been incorporated into the AFM sample plate while still allowing optical access to the sample from below. The use of vacuum reduces noise and eliminates the “drum” effect that is created when these thin‐bottomed petri dishes are positioned over the optical aperture in the sample stage. Images were taken at 384 × 384 pixels with a PeakForce Tapping frequency of 1 kHz and amplitude of 300 nm. Probe–sample contact time was about 200 μs each cycle. Automatic gain control was used to improve the feedback for surface tracking. Height sensor signal was used to display the cell surface image using Nanoscope Analysis v1.60 (Bruker Nano Surfaces, Santa Barbara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Atomic Force Microscopy for Cell Nanomechanics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Before the AFM experiments, the 50,000 cells were seeded per dish and treated for 48 and 72 h with inhibitors. The AFM measurements were performed at 37 °C, using a commercial atomic force microscope Bioscope Resolve AFM (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) combined with an inverted optical microscope (Carl Zeiss, Ulm, Germany). The PeakForce QNM-Live Cell cantilevers (PFQNM-LC-A-CAL, Bruker AFM Probes, USA) with a pre-calibrated spring constant (in a range of 0.06–0.08 N/m) and a 70 nm tip radius was used. The deflection sensitivity (nm/V) was calibrated from the thermal using the pre-calibrated value of the spring constant. The nanomechanical maps were acquired in the force volume mode with a typical map size of 80 × 80 microns and 40 × 40 measurement points [73 (link)]. For the force curves, a vertical ramp distance was 3 μm, a vertical piezo speed was 183 μm/s, and the trigger force was 0.5–1 nN. The Young’s modulus (E) was calculated by fitting the force curves with the Hertz model with a bottom-effect correction [73 (link),74 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Atomic Force Microscopy of Bacterial Nanowires

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial cells or the nanowire filaments were immobilized on glass slides and loaded on a Bioscope Resolve AFM (Bruker, USA). The AFM was operated in PeakForce QNM mode and using SCANASYST-AIR probes (nominal spring constant 0.4 N/m, nominal tip radius 2 nm) (Bruker AFM Probes, USA). All images were further processed and analyzed by Nanoscope Analysis 1.9 (Bruker, USA). KPFM mode was used to measure the surface potential of GY32 cells and the nanowire appendages with electrically conductive SCM-PIT probes (Bruker AFM Probes, USA). The bacteria samples were loaded on gold-coated mica substrates or highly oriented pyrolytic graphites and then washed with deionized water five times. After being air-dried, the samples were scanned with a lift scan height of 50 nm and a drive amplitude of 2 V. The AFM investigation was performed for three independent cultures of L. varians GY32 all showing similar results.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Atomic Force Microscopy of Red Blood Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM experiments were performed with a Bioscope Resolve AFM (Bruker) at ∼25–30°C in DMEM. PeakForce QNM Live Cell probes (Bruker) with spring constants of 0.10 ± 0.02 N m–1 and tip radius of curvature of 65 nm were used. The spring constant of the cantilevers was calibrated with a vibrometer (OFV-551, Polytec, Waldbronn) by the manufacturer. The pre-calibrated spring constant was used to determine the deflection sensitivity (Schillers et al., 2017 ) using the thermal noise method (Hutter and Bechhoefer, 1993 (link)) before each experiment. In fast indentation experiments (Dumitru et al., 2018 (link)), the AFM was operated in PeakForce QNM mode and Force-distance (FD)-based multiparametric maps were acquired using a force setpoint of 300 pN. The AFM cantilever was oscillated vertically at 0.25 kHz with a peak-to-peak oscillation amplitude of 500 nm. Height and Young’s modulus maps were recorded using a scan rate of 0.2 Hz and 256 pixels per line. Slow indentation experiments were performed in Force-Volume (FV) mode. Individual FD curves were recorded in contact mode on the RBC surface with a force setpoint of 300 pN, using ramp speeds of 2 μm s–1 for a 2 μm ramp size. Measurements were performed in the central region of RBCs to avoid substrate effects. Indentations ranged between 300 nm and 1 μm depending on cell type.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!