The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Abi stepone plus real time pcr detection system

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States

The ABI StepOne Plus Real-Time PCR Detection system is a compact, easy-to-use instrument designed for real-time PCR analysis. It utilizes fluorescence detection technology to monitor and quantify nucleic acid amplification in real-time.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using abi stepone plus real time pcr detection system

1

Quantitative RT-PCR Protocol for Rat Liver Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The RNA simple Total RNA Kit (DP419) (Tiangen, Beijing, China) was used to isolate the total RNA from the liver samples. A RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (K1622) (Thermofisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used to reverse transcribe 4 μg of total RNA into cDNA following the manufacturer’s instructions. TB Green Premix ExTaqII reagent (RR820A) (Takara, Dalian, China) was used to perform the quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) cycles on an ABI StepOne Plus Real-Time PCR Detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The online site of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) was used to search for specific rat gene sequences, and the corresponding primers were designed using Primer 3 and the NCBI Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). HPRT was used as the housekeeping gene. The following primer sequences were used in the real-time PCR analysis:
The primers were also evaluated by the amplification curve and melting curve obtained using an ABI StepOne Plus Real-Time PCR Detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). In each sample, the expression of the target gene was defined by normalizing the ΔCT (CTtarget–CTHPRT) of the sample against the average ΔCT of the tissues from the sham group [25 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using a Total RNA Kit I (OMEGA, CA, USA: R6834-01) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol, and cDNA was synthesized using a PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan). Expression of mRNA was examined by RT-PCR using FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master Mix (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) with gene-specific primers and an ABI StepOne Plus™ Real-time PCR Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The expression values were normalized to GAPDH expression. The sequences of the primers (Generay Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) used are listed in Supplementary Figure S5c.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying mRNA Transcripts by qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from cells using TRIzol (Invitrogen) and was reverse-transcribed into cDNA using ReverTra Ace reverse transcriptase (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). PCR was performed using Taq DNA Polymerase (Takara, Shiga, Japan). QRT-PCR was carried out using ABI StepOne Plus Real-Time PCR Detection system (Applied Biosystems, Grand Island, NY, USA) with SYBR Premix Ex TaqTM II (Takara, Shiga, Japan). All genes were amplified for 40 circles. The relative level of each mRNA transcript were calculated by normalizing to β-actin and expressed as a relative ratio. The (q) RT-PCR primers are listed in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative miRNA Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cellular RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, followed by a reverse transcription with cDNA synthesis kit (ThermoFisher, Rockford, IL, USA). cDNA was synthesized from 2 µg of total RNA using 1 µL of reverse transcriptase and 50 ng/mL oligo(dT).
For detection of mature miRNAs (miRNA-1285, miRNA-25 and miRNA-30d), 500 ng of total RNA, miRNA-specific stem–loop RT primers (RiboBio), and PrimeScript RT reagent Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) were used in reverse transcription. U6 small nuclear RNA (RNU6B) was used as an internal control to determine relative miRNA expression. Each qPCR was carried out in triplicate using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems) at one cycle of 95 °C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, and 60 °C for 1 min on ABISteponePlus Real Time PCR Detection System (Applied Biosystems, USA). PCR mix was: 1 µL template cDNA, 5 µL SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, USA), 3 µL ddH2O, 1 µL (200 nM) of forward and reverse primers mix. All expression values were normalized against the housekeeping gene β-actin or the U6 (ΔCt = Ct target geneCt β-actin/U6). Relative expression levels were then calculated as ΔΔCt = ΔCt MeHg − ΔCt control, and relative expression changes were calculated as 2−ΔΔCt. PCR primer sequences are available in the Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying GPX3 Expression in Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from the samples with TRIzol (Vazyme, Nanjin, China). In this study, we extracted untreated ovarian cancer (Ovcar-4), breast cancer (MDA-MB-231, BT-549), colorectal cancer (Lovo, SW480) and gastric cancer (MKN45) cells’ RNA to examine the basal expression level of GPX3 in these cells. After transfected GPX3 knockout adenovirus (shGPX3), GPX3 overexpression adenovirus (oeGPX3) and corresponding control (Ctrl) into breast cancer (MDA-MB-231, BT-549), colorectal cancer (Lovo, SW480), gastric cancer (MKN45), and ovarian cancer (Ovcar-4) cells for 72h, their RNA was extracted. Later, we examined the efficiency of adenovirus transfection in regulating GPX3 expression. The complementary DNA was synthesized using a PrimeScript RT reagent Kit (Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan), messenger RNA expression was examined by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master Mix (Takara Bio, Otsu, Japan) and performed in ABI StepOne Plus Real-time PCR Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). PCR recycling condition: 95 °C, 5min; 95 °C for 10s, 60 °C for 30s, 40 cycles.
The expression level of GAPDH was simultaneously quantified as an internal standard control. The sequences of all primers (Sangon, Shanghai, China) used were as follows:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative Real-Time PCR of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cellular RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer's recommendations, followed by a reverse transcription with cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo). cDNA was synthesized from 2 µg of total RNA using 1 µL of reverse transcriptase and 50 ng/mL oligo (dT). Each qPCR was carried out in triplicate using SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, CA, USA) at one cycle of 95°C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, and 60°C for 1 min on ABI Stepone Plus Real Time PCR Detection System (Applied Biosystems). PCR mix included 1 µL template cDNA, 5 µL SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 3 µL ddH2O, 1 µL (200 nM) of forward and reverse primers mix. Fold changes in the expression of each gene were calculated by a comparative threshold cycle (Ct) method using the formula 2−(ΔΔCt). PCR primer sequences are available in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Protocol for Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The quantitative real‐time PCR (qRT‐PCR) reaction was performed in 96‐well plates using 2.0X RealQ‐PCR Master Mix® with SYBR Green (Ampliqon) on ABI StepOnePlus™ Real‐Time PCR Detection System (Applied Biosystems). All qRT‐PCR primers were designed by Allele ID 6 software (Premier Biosoft) and described in Table 1. Each reaction mixture consisted of 1 µL cDNA (10 ng), 10 µL 2X RealQ‐PCR Master Mix®, 1 µL (10 pmol/µL) of both forward and reverse primers, and 7 µL of PCR‐grade water, equating to a final volume of 20 µL. The beta‐2 microglobulin (β2M) mRNA was used as the reference gene. β2M was selected as the reference gene according to previous research for identification of housekeeping control genes in colorectal cancer.19 The thermal profile of the reaction was performed using the following conditions: initial denaturation at 95°C for 15 minutes; followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 seconds and 60°C for 60 seconds followed by melting curve stage assessment. The melting curve profile and agarose gel electrophoresis were performed to verify the specificity of primers and the authenticity of the PCR products.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of RNA Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNAs were extracted from the cells or tissues using TRIzol® Reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen) and genomic DNA was removed using DNase I (TaKara). The reverse transcription of total RNA to cDNA was performed with Thremo RT supermix kit. Quantitative Real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using the ABI StepOnePlus Real-time PCR Detection System (Applied Biosystems, US) with an SYBR green fluorescence system. The primers used in this study are provided in Supplementary Table S3, using CTBP as internal control gene for hepatoma cells and GAPDH for HEK293T. The experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated 3 times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

CMV-IE Promoter Detection in Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thirty-five cycle PCR for detecting the presence of the CMV-IE promoter sequence was performed with the primers 5′-TAGCTAGCGTTACATAACTTACGG-3′ (forward) and 5′-CGGAATTCAAAACAAACTCCCAT TGAC-3′ (reverse). Genomic DNA of the liver tissues served as the templates. The reaction products were electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel.
Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells and liver tissues with TRIzol reagent (Thermo, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) and quantified via a NanoDrop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA). Reverse transcription was performed with a Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Roche Diagnostics Indianapolis, IN, USA). The relative abundance of each mRNA in the sample was determined using qRT-PCR with the corresponding primer pairs (Supplementary Table S1) and the FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master (ROX) (Roche Diagnostics Indianapolis, IN, USA) on an ABI StepOne Plus Real-time PCR Detection System (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Cycle threshold values were obtained from the StepOne TM Software Version 2.2.2 (Applied Biosystems). Data were analyzed using the 2-ΔΔCT method, and β-actin served as an internal control. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of triplicate reactions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Analysis of Immune Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNAs were extracted using the RNeasy Kit (Takara Bio). The qRT-PCR was carried out using SYBR Green Premix Ex TaqTM II (Takara Bio) on a ABI StepOnePlus Real-Time PCR Detection System (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Results were normalized to the housekeeping gene GAPDH. Relative gene expression levels from different groups were calculated with the 2-ΔΔCT method and compared with the expression level of appropriate control cells.
Specific primer sequences for individual genes were as follows: CCL5 (forward: 5′-GTATTTCTACACCAGCAGCAAG-3′; reverse: 5′-TCTTGAACCCACTTCTTCTCTG-3′); CXCL9 (forward: 5′-AATCCCTCAAAGACCTCAAACA-3′; reverse: 5′-TCCCATTCTTTCATCAGCTTCT-3′); CXCL10 (forward: 5′-CAACTGCATCCATATCGATGAC-3′; reverse: 5′-GATTCCGGATTCAGACATCTCT-3′); PD-L1 (forward: 5′-TGAGCAAGTGATTCAGTTTGTG-3′; reverse: 5′-CATTTCCCTTCAAAAGCTGGTC-3′); iNOS (forward: 5′-GCCGAGTGCAAGCATGGAGAG-3′; reverse: 5′-GGCTGTGAGGTGAGGTTGAAGAAG-3′); CD86 (forward: 5′-ACGGAGTCAATGAAGATTTCCT-3′; reverse: 5′-GATTCGGCTTCTTGTGACATAC-3′); CD206 (forward: 5′-CCTATGAAAATTGGGCTTACGG-3′; reverse: 5′-CTGACAAATCCAGTTGTTGAGG-3′); Arg1 (forward: 5′-CATATCTGCCAAAGACATCGTG-3′; reverse: 5′-GACATCAAAGCTCAGGTGAATC-3′); and GAPDH (forward: 5′-GTATTTCTACACCAGCAGCAAG-3′; reverse: 5′-TCTTGAACCCACTTCTTCTCTG-3′).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!