The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

44 protocols using lunar piximus

1

Longitudinal Bone Density Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The BMD of tibia and whole body were monitored using a DEXA scanner (Lunar PIXImus; GE Medical Systems, Piscataway, NJ, USA) under anesthesia, as previously described.22 (link) Briefly, the anesthetized mouse was placed on a specimen tray (Lunar PIXImus) and). The femur was positioned at a 90° angle with the tibia. Tibial and whole-body BMD were monitored once a month.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Bone Analysis by DXA and μCT

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BMD was assessed by whole body DXA scanning, which was performed on mice anesthetized by inhaled isoflurane and using a Lunar Piximus densitometer (GE Medical Systems), as reported (46 (link)). DXA images were analyzed using Piximus software, as reported (46 (link)). Trabecular bone volume and structure were assessed by μCT analysis of the proximal tibia using a SkyScan 1174 scanner (SkyScan), with X-ray settings 50 kV, 800 μA, 12.6 μm isometric voxel resolution, and 0.7 degree rotation step. The tibial trabecular region, located 1.5 mm distally from the growth plate, was selected for analysis, and a volume of interest was delineated by drawing within the cortex of the trabecular region. A threshold of 80–255 density units was selected to distinguish mineralized trabecular tissue from surrounding soft tissue of the marrow cavity. Cross-sectional images were obtained and 3-D reconstruction undertaken using Skyscan CT Analyzer software (version 1.9.3.0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Post-Mortem Body Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After post mortem whole frozen bodies (non-pregnant n = 6; pregnant n = 6 (excluding the uterus and fetal tissues for the pregnant cohort)) were subjected to Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA; Lunar PIXImus, GE Medical Systems, Wisconsin), for assessment of lean tissue mass, bone mineral density (BMD) and tissue fat mass [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Femur and Tibia Bone Density Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The BMD (g/cm2) of the epiphyseal plates and body of the right femur and tibia was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorption (Lunar PIXImus; GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA, USA). In addition, the BMD of the articulate regions and body of the L4 was determined prior to BMC measurement. The bone strength was measured in terms of FL. The FL (newtons, N) of the mid-shaft regions of the right femur and tibia was measured using a three-point bending test to failure on a computerized testing machine (Instron 6022; Instron, Norwood, MA, USA; speed, 20 mm/min). In addition, the FL of the L4 body was measured.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Body Composition Analysis by DEXA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Changes in body composition were determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) using a densitometer (Lunar PIXImus; GE Medical Systems, Madison, WI, USA). This system employs a cone beam X-ray source generating energies of 35 and 80 keV and a flat 100 × 80 mm detector with individual pixel dimensions of 0.18 × 0.18 mm. The ratio of energy attenuation in the luminescent panel separates bone, lean tissue, and fat mass. A quality control procedure was routinely performed with a calibration phantom before imaging. Mice were anesthetized by intraperitoneal (IP) injection of 100 mg/kg ketamine and 10 mg/kg xylazine (Cristália, SP, Brazil) to ensure good immobilization and positioning during a five-minute acquisition [27 (link)]. Analyses were performed at baseline and at the end of the 24th week of diet, and the results were expressed as a percentage of body fat.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Assessing Lean Body Mass via DEXA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were subjected to Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA; Lunar PIXImus; General Electric, Boston, MA, USA) and images were analyzed to assess lean body mass (LM) [34 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

DEXA Scanning for Body Composition in Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Body composition of 1x backcrossed mice was assessed by DEXA scan using the Lunar Piximus (GE healthcare). Mice were anesthetized before scanning and were placed with their stomach down. ROI was adapted not to include the head. During the anesthesia, the mice were measured from the tip of the nose to the base of the tail.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multimodal Bone Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA, GE Lunar PixiMus, Madison, WI) was performed on excised right femora and L4 vertebrae for measures of areal bone mineral density (aBMD g/cm2), bone mineral content (BMC, g) and area (cm2). Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT, XCT Research SA+, Stratec Medizintechnik GmbH, Pforzheim, Germany) was performed on the right femur midshaft for cortical bone morphometric properties (volumetric BMD (vBMD), BMC, cortical area and thickness, periostal and endosteal circumferences and x-axis cross-sectional moment of inertia). Micro-computed tomography (µCT, Brucker Skyscan 1172, Kontich, Belgium) was performed on L4 vertebral bodies and the right distal femur for cancellous bone morphometric properties. Scans were done at 8 µm resolution, 65 kV and 120 µA using a 0.7° rotation step. Reconstructed µCT images (NRecon software) were analyzed using CT Analyzer software (Skyscan, Kontich, Belgium). The same parameters/thresholds were used for each site for reconstruction and analysis. Outcome measurements included whole vertebral body bone volume (BV, mm3), trabecular bone volume fraction (BV/TV,% [where TV is tissue volume]), trabecular number (Tb.N, mm−1), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th, mm), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp, mm), connectivity density (Conn.D, mm−3), and structural model index (SMI).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Calorie Restriction Modulates Mouse Physiology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
This study was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Wisconsin, Madison. Male B6C3F1 hybrid mice were housed under controlled pathogen‐free conditions. Mice were randomized into control or restricted groups at 2 months of age and fed 87 kcal week−1 (Bio‐Serv diet #F05312), which is ~95% of ad libitum intake, or 73 kcal week−1, which is a 23% reduction in calorie intake from ad libitum levels and 16% reduction from controls (Bio‐Serv diet #F05314). Total daily intake for CR mice was proportionately lower in carbohydrates than controls (20% lower) with the difference made up in equivalent proportional increases in fat and protein contents (Table S6, Supporting information). Fatty acid composition was identical for both diets. Mice were individually housed to ensure consumption of all food and so that precise caloric intake could be known. Body composition was determined on anesthetized mice using dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (GE Lunar Piximus) 2 weeks prior tissue harvest. A list of all measured parameters for each mouse is provided in Table S7 (Supporting information).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Longitudinal Bone Density Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice were anesthetized with ketamine/xylazine, and a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan was performed as described previously [41 (link)] before (mice aged 8 weeks) and after the administration of the diet for 3 months (mice aged 20 weeks) using a Lunar PIXImus mouse bone densitometer (General Electric). BMD was analyzed manually with PIXImus software as described previously [41 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!