The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Statistical package for the social sciences version 13

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

SPSS version 13.0 is a software package designed for statistical analysis. It provides a wide range of data manipulation and analysis tools for researchers and professionals working in the social sciences and related fields. The core function of SPSS is to enable users to perform various statistical analyses, including but not limited to regression, correlation, and hypothesis testing.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

96 protocols using statistical package for the social sciences version 13

1

Statistical Analysis of Research Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analysed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences between mean values were tested for significance by performing either unpaired, two-tailed Student’s t-tests or one-way ANOVA analysis followed by Tukey’s multiple-comparison test, when appropriate. A P value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant. Correlations were evaluated by regression analysis using the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comparative Hemodynamic Outcomes Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The primary outcome measure of the study was the MAP, and the secondary outcomes were the HR, VAS scores, and additional intraoperative and postoperative drug use. A priori sample size estimation revealed that at least 84 subjects were required to achieve a power of 90% (α = 0.05) to detect a difference in the MAP between the groups with a large effect size (0.40). Thus, 90 patients were included (30 in each group). Data analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data are expressed as mean, SD, number, and percentage as appropriate. Intragroup comparisons of continuous variables were performed by a paired t-test for normally distributed variables and by the Wilcoxon test for non-normally distributed variables. For non-normally distributed variables, two-group comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test, and multiple-group comparisons were performed using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Non-Normally Distributed Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 13.0 (SPSS Inc.; Chicago, IL, USA). The distribution of the data was examined with the Shapiro-Wilk test. For non-normally distributed data, the Mann-Whitney U test was used for two-group comparisons and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used for comparisons of more than two groups. The relationships between the variables were examined with the Spearman correlation coefficient. Categorical data were analyzed by Pearson’s chi-square test and Yantes corrected chi-square test. A P value <0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

MIC-1 Biomarker Analysis for Tumor Diagnosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Kruskal–Wallis test and Mann–Whitney test were used to compare the level of MIC-1 among all groups and between unpaired groups, respectively. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare MIC-1 level in paired serum samples obtained before surgical tumor resection and one month after surgical tumor resection as well as at the time of recurrence. Spearman bivariate correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the diagnostic performance. Logistic regression model was also fitted to combine diagnostic information of biomarkers. The level of MIC-1 mRNA in tissues and protein in serum were described as mean ± SEM and mean ± standard deviation, respectively. The statistical analyses were performed with the statistical package for the social sciences, version 13.0 (SPSS), and a two-sided P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Statistical Analysis of MIC1 and Survival

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Mann–Whitney U-test and Wilcoxon test were used to compare the level of MIC1 among all groups and each pair of groups. Spearman bivariate correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation. The long-rank test was used to compare survival curves and Cox proportional hazards model was used for prognostic analysis. Variables that achieved statistical significance (P < 0.05) or those that were close to significance (P < 0.1) by univariate analysis were subsequently included in the multivariate analysis. The statistical analyses were performed with the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and a two-sided P-value <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis of Satisfaction Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 13.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, IL, USA) was used in the analysis of the data. Results for the continuous variables were reported as median (minimum-maximum values) or mean±standard deviation, and compared by Mann-Whitney test and Student's t-test, respectively. The results for categorical variables were reported as frequency (percentage) and compared by Fisher’s exact test or Pearson chi-square test, as appropriate. Pearson or Spearman rank correlation coefficients were employed for correlations between overall satisfaction, current age, and year of degree completion. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comparative Evaluation of Analgesic Treatments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for the statistical analyses. One-way analysis of variance and the least significant difference method were used to compare differences among the groups. P values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Prognostic Significance of RasGRP3 in Prostate Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pearson's χ2 test was used to analyze the association between RasGRP3 expression and specific clinical parameters, including T classification, N classification, surgical margin status, Gleason score and pretreatment PSA. Survival and PSA recurrence curves were evaluated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the differences were assessed using the log-rank test. All clinical parameters were analyzed with a univariate Cox proportional hazards model; variables were considered significantly at a level of P<0.1. These significant variables were analyzed stepwise into multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Related data were analyzed with t-test between two groups or analysis of variance among three groups. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, Version 13.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). P<0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were presented as mean ± SD or n (%), differences between groups were analyzed by unpaired Student’s t test. Comparisons of categorical variables were conducted using x2 testing. For all statistical analyses, 2-tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) or GraphPad Prism 4.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Corneal Thickness and Endothelial Damage

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Endothelial damage between cross-linked corneas and their paired controls was carried out using standard paired t-tests. The mean central corneal thickness and ΔTm among groups were also compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 13.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for all statistical analyses. The significance value was P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!