The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

D5000 powder diffractometer

Manufactured by Siemens

The D5000 powder diffractometer is a laboratory instrument designed for the analysis of crystalline materials. It utilizes X-ray diffraction techniques to provide detailed information about the structure and composition of powder samples. The core function of the D5000 is to precisely measure the diffraction patterns of materials, which can be used to identify unknown substances, quantify the phases present, and characterize the structural properties of the sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using d5000 powder diffractometer

1

Characterization of Gadolinium-Doped Titania Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TEM was used to assess the size, morphology and crystal structure of the gadolinium-doped titania NPs. TEM was performed using a JEOL JEM-2010 microscope equipped with a LaB6 thermionic electron gun operating at a primary beam energy of 200 keV and an Oxford Instruments INCA X-ray analysis system for carrying out energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). By analyzing the characteristic X-rays produced by the interaction of the primary electron beam with the sample, the elements present in the sample could be determined. TEM specimens were prepared by resuspending the NPs in ethanol and drop casting onto holey carbon-coated grids (Agar Scientific).
The crystal structure of the TiOx NPs was obtained by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a fully automated Siemens D5000 powder diffractometer employing copper Ka radiation (k=0.15406 nm) and a secondary monochromator. The sample was supported on a single crystal of silicon and continuously spun during data collection. The sample was scanned using a step size of 0.05°, between the range of 10°–90° 2θ, and a count time of 12 seconds per step. The crystal phases were determined by comparing the diffraction pattern obtained with standard data from the International Centre of Diffraction Data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Powder Diffraction Analysis of Trichomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder diffraction diagrams of isolated trichomes were first recorded with a PW 1049/10 diffractometer with Bragg-Brentano geometry at the Institute for Inorganic Chemistry, University of Bonn, Germany, using Co-Kα radiation (wavelength 1.79 Å). The diffraction diagrams were recorded with steps of 2θ = 0.02° and acquisition times between 1 and 10 s per step. A second long-term measurement was carried out with a Siemens D5000 powder diffractometer with a graphite secondary monochromator at the Steinmann Institute of the University of Bonn, Germany, using Cu-Kα radiation (wavelength 1.54 Å). The trichomes were spread on a Si wafer and the diffraction pattern was recorded between 24 and 38° 2θ with an aquisition time of 120 s per 2θ step, which was necessary to detect the (002) peak of hydroxylapatite.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Cu, Zn, and Fe Zeolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns of the Cu- and Zn-zeolite samples were collected on Bruker D8 powder X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation with a wavelength of 1.5406 Å, and the PXRD patterns of Fe-zeolites were collected on Siemens D5000 powder diffractometer with Co Kα radiation with a wavelength of 1.7902 Å at a scan speed of 2.0 °/min and a step size of 0.04°. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of powdered samples were collected using an XL30 environmental FEG (FEI) microscope operating at 15 kV acceleration voltage. Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface areas were estimated with a Micrometrics ASAP 2020 volumetric adsorption analyzer with nitrogen as the adsorbate at 77 K. Prior to the analysis, samples (300 mg) were degassed at 300 °C for 10 h under vacuum until a residual pressure of ≤10 μm Hg was reached. Specific surface areas were determined from the BET equation. The t-plot method was used to distinguish the micropores from the mesopores in the samples and to calculate the external surface areas. The mesopore volumes were calculated after subtracting the micropore volume from the total pore volume. Mesopore size distributions were obtained using the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method assuming a cylindrical pore model.39
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

X-ray Powder Diffraction Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The X-ray powder diffractogram was recorded in the 2θ range from 0° to 80°, in a Siemens D-5000 powder diffractometer using Cu Kα radiation (λκα = 1.54 Å).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Physicochemical Characterization of Zeolite Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns of the Cu- and Zn-zeolite samples were collected on Bruker D8 powder X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation with a wavelength of 1.5406 Å, and the PXRD patterns of Fe-zeolites were collected on Siemens D5000 powder diffractometer with Co Kα radiation with a wavelength of 1.7902 Å at a scan speed of 2.0° min−1 and a step size of 0.04°. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of powdered samples were collected using an XL30 environmental FEG (FEI) microscope operating at 15 kV acceleration voltage. Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface areas were estimated with a Micrometrics ASAP 2020 volumetric adsorption analyzer with nitrogen as the adsorbate at 77 K. Prior to the analysis, samples (300 mg) were degassed at 300 °C for 10 h under vacuum until a residual pressure of ≤10 μm Hg was reached. Specific surface areas were determined from the BET equation. The t-plot method was used to distinguish the micropores from the mesopores in the samples and to calculate the external surface areas. The mesopore volumes were calculated by subtracting the micropore volume from the total pore volume. Mesopore size distributions were obtained using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method assuming a cylindrical pore model.39 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!