The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lumox

Manufactured by Sarstedt
Sourced in Germany

The Lumox is a laboratory equipment product offered by Sarstedt. It is designed to serve a core function, but a detailed description cannot be provided while maintaining an unbiased and factual approach. Further information is not available.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using lumox

1

Immunofluorescence Staining of hiPSC-Derived Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence staining was performed as described elsewhere [70 (link)]. Antibodies used are listed in Table 4. Staining of hiPSC-derived cultures was performed in 24-well plates (lumox®, Sarstedt, Nümbrecht-Rommelsdorf, Germany), while HUVEC were cultured and subsequently fixed on chamber slides (Thermo Scientific™ Nunc™ Lab-Tek™ II Chamber Slide™ System) for immunocytochemical analysis.
Fluorescence microscopic pictures were analysed by means of the open source image processing program ImageJ recording at least 5 visual fields for each group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

HL-1 Cardiomyocyte Culture for Hypoxic Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HL-1 cardiomyocytes (SCC065, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Mo, USA) were cultured as previously described.13 (link) Cells were grown in Claycomb medium enriched with fetal bovine serum 10%, penicillin/streptomycin 100 U/mL:100 µg/mL, 0.1 mM norepinephrine, and 2 mM L-glutamine in T25 flasks (C6481, Sigma-Aldrich). After reaching confluence, they were harvested and plated on 50-mm diameter fluorocarbon-bottom dishes, which are highly permeable for gases for hypoxic exposure (Lumox, Sarstedt AG&Co, Nümbrecht, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Optimizing sMSC Transfection and Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
One day before transfection, murine sMSC were cultured in x-well Tissue Culture Chambers (18,000 cells/chamber, 8-well on lumox, Sarstedt, Nuembrecht, Germany). Transfection medium alone or 50 pmol siRNA duplex (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Heidelberg, Germany) were added to the serum-free culture and incubated for 18 h. Transfection was stopped by adding the equal volume of DMEM supplemented with 20% FCS and the cells were incubated for additional 24 h. The medium was then aspirated and replaced with DMEM containing 10% FCS. After 24 h and 11 days the siRNA transfection was repeated under the same conditions.
The efficiency of PDPN siRNA silencing was tested with the migration assay using 60,000 cells on a ThinCert™24-well plate (8 µm pore size). Cultures of sMSC supplemented with DMEM or TM as controls were assayed for 3 h against siRNA transfected cells. Quantification of migrated cells was performed with the CTB assay (Promega).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Generating Forebrain Organoid Fusions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All hPSC experiments were conducted following prior approval from the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Embryonic Stem Cell Research Oversight Committee (ESCRO) and Institutional Review Board. Cortex (Cx) and ganglionic eminence (GE) organoids were generated from the H9 hESC line58 or Rett hiPSCs39 as described previously17 (link) and outlined in schematic form in Fig 1a. Fusion was performed with minor modifications as previously reported19 (link). Cx and GE Organoids were cut at day 56 and two halves (e.g. Cx+GE or Cx+Cx) were combined in a microcentrifuge tube containing 300 μl of N2B27 media17 (link) and placed in a hyperoxic incubator containing 5% CO2 and 40% O2 for 72 hours. Fused structures were then carefully transferred to 24-well oxygen permeable dishes (Lumox, Sarstedt) and maintained in a hyperoxic environment with media changes every other day until their use. Neuron migration experiments were conducted by infection of either a Cx or GE organoid with 5 μl of ~1.98×1013 ml−1 AAV1-tdTomato (pENN.AAV.CAG.tdTomato.WPRE.SV40, a gift of Dr. James M. Wilson, University of Pennsylvania Vector Core AV-1-PV3365) on day 56 and fusion was performed as described 3 days after infection.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Modular Bioreactor for Gas Transfer Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gas transfer was evaluated in a custom-made modular bioreactor system (depicted in Figure 1) that ensures a laminar flow and a well-defined wall shear stress in the range of physiological values. The reactor itself consists of two chambers, a gas-carrying chamber, and a test fluid-filled chamber, which are separated from one another by a gas permeable membrane. The employed membrane is a nonporous fluorocarbon membrane (lumox®, Sarstedt) with a thickness of 25 μm that allows for cultivation of adherent cells surface treatment (not specified) carried out by the manufacturer.
In terms of a laminar and steady flow of an incompressible frictional fluid between parallel plates, the wall shear stress (WSS) in the test fluid-filled chamber is given by the following [25 (link)]: τ0=3·η·V˙2·b·h2.
Here, τ0 is the shear stress at the wall, η = 0.693 mPa s is the dynamic viscosity of culture medium at 37°C, V˙ is the flow rate, b is the width, and h is half the distance between the plates. For this chamber, the mean retention time tt is given by the quotient of the reactor volume VR to the flow rate V˙ ; hence tt=VRV˙. The parameters for this calculation are given in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Culturing Intestinal Epithelial T84 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The intestinal epithelial cell line T84 (CCL-248; ATCC, Molsheim, France) was maintained in an atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37 °C in the culture medium recommended by ATCC (Molsheim, France). T84 cells were cultivated using conventional polystyrene dishes or special gas-permeable dishes with a hydrophilic tissue culture-treated bottom membrane (Lumox; Sarstedt, Marnay, France) as previously used [43 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluation of Aldehyde/Alcohol Dehydrogenase Activity

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aldehyde/alcohol dehydrogenase activity was measured indirectly by evaluating oxidation or reduction of NAD(P)(H) photometrically at 340 nm in triplicate in 96-well plates (lumox®, Sarstedt, Nümbrecht, Germany) using an MRX ELISA reader (Dynex Technologies, Chantilly, VA, USA).
The assays were performed depending on the pH in a 100 mM glycine buffer (pH 8, 9), 100 mM Tris buffer (pH 7, 7.4, 6) at a total volume of 200 µL containing 4 µg recEhADH3Bb, 0.1–100 mM substrate, and 0.7 mM NAD(P)H/NAD(P). The amount of enzyme which is needed to catalyze the oxidation or reduction of 1 μmol of NAD(P)(H) is defined as one unit. The following substrates were tested: Methanol, ethanol, 1-propanol, 2-propanol, butanol, formaldehyde (methanal), acetaldehyde (ethanal), propionaldehyde (propanal) and butyraldehyde (butanal). EDTA (10 mM) was incubated with the enzyme for 1 h on ice. To remove EDTA, the enzyme solution was dialysed against an EDTA-free buffer. Different metal ions at a concentration of 1 mM were added to the dialyzed enzyme solution and incubated for 1 h on ice. Subsequently acetaldehyde-dependent oxidation of NAD(P)H was measured. The metal-free and dialyzed recEhADH3Bb served as negative control. As positive control the NAD(H)-dependent alcohol dehydrogenase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Merck, Sigma Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Live-cell Imaging of LRIG1 Induction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For all live-cell assays, cells were seeded at a density of 10,000 cells per cm² in either standard 6-well or Sarstedt Lumox 24-well plates. To induce LRIG1 expression in LRIG1-inducible cells, 1 µg/ml of doxycycline was added. Plates were incubated overnight. Prior to recording, wells were washed once in PBS to remove debris, resupplemented with standard cell culture medium, covered with HoloLids (Phase Holographic, Lund, Sweden), and inserted in a HoloMonitor holographic microscope (Phase Holographic) mounted inside a standard cell culture incubator. Live-cell imaging was performed on 16 prede ned 0.52 × 0.52 mm areas per well, which were continuously recorded at 8-minute intervals for 48 hours. Proliferation curves were created by measuring the cell count in each area at 1-hour intervals, and doubling time was calculated by comparing cell counts at t = 0 and t = 48 hours. Cell migration, measured as average cell motility in µm/hour, was calculated by tracking individual cell movements on a frame by frame basis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Cell Culture and Gene Targeting

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell culture and gene targeting For transfection, 4 x 10 3 cells/well were plated in 24-well plates a day before transfection. Plasmids for transfection were prepared using the NucleoSpin buffer set (Clontech) and VitaScientific columns. Cells for gene targeting were transfected with 250 ng of donor and 125ng of 2 gRNA plasmids using ViaFect (Promega) transfection reagent according to the manufacturer's instruction. Seventytwo hours after transfection, cells were seeded on 10-cm dishes with the selective antibiotics (puromycin 1 mg/ml) until clones were formed on a plate. Analysis of localization and expression of targeted proteins in clones were performed after 14-to 20-day period post transfection on a 24-well lumox (Sarstedt) plates. Clones with proper protein localization were propagated for genomic PCR and western blot analysis in regular complete media without selective antibiotics.
Results were comparable in both cell lines although DLD-1 cell lines were preferentially used in the imaging-based experiments due to their flatter cellular morphology.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!