The malondialdehyde (MDA) was determined according to the method of Zhang et al. (2007) (link). The concentration of MDA was determined using the colorimetric method of thiobarbituric acid (TBA) with Micro MDA Assay Kit (BC0025; Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Micro mda assay kit
The Micro MDA Assay Kit is a laboratory equipment designed to measure malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in biological samples. It provides a quantitative analysis of MDA, which is a biomarker for oxidative stress. The kit includes reagents and buffers necessary to perform the assay.
Lab products found in correlation
12 protocols using micro mda assay kit
Quantifying Oxidative Stress Markers
The malondialdehyde (MDA) was determined according to the method of Zhang et al. (2007) (link). The concentration of MDA was determined using the colorimetric method of thiobarbituric acid (TBA) with Micro MDA Assay Kit (BC0025; Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
Microplate-based MDA Quantification
Measuring Oxidative Stress Markers
Evaluating Fetal Brain Lipid Oxidation
Measuring Drought-Induced Oxidative Stress
The REL was measured as described by Yu et al. [57 (link)] with minor modifications. Leaves were sampled, rinsed with deionized water and dried with filter paper. A 0.3 g sample of leaf was placed into a 50 ml tube with 20 ml deionized water for 5 h. The conductivity (C1) was measured with a conductivity meter model DDS-11 (Biocotek, Ningbo, China). Subsequently, the samples were boiled for 15 minutes, cooled at room temperature and used to measure conductivity (C2) again. REL was calculated using the following formula: REL = (C1
Quantifying Chlorophyll Content in Plants
A total of 0.1 g of sample was ground with a small amount of quartz sand, calcium carbonate powder, and 2.5 mL of anhydrous ethanol and then transferred into a 10 mL centrifuge tube, and 7.5 mL of anhydrous ethanol was added. After centrifugation at 4 °C and 5000× g for 10 min, 200 μL of the supernatant was applied to determine absorbance at 665 and 645 nm. The chlorophyll content of the sample was calculated according to the simplified formula: chlorophyll content (mg·g−1, FW) = 0.663 A665 + 0.808 A649. Each sample was replicated at least 3 times.
Measurement of Intracellular MDA Levels
Stress-induced Physiological Changes
Quantification of Seedling Stress Responses
Electrolyte leakage (EL) was calculated by measuring the conductivity [31 (link)]. Approx. 0.5 g of samples were cut into small pieces and transferred to 10 mL deionized water. The conductivity (C1) was measured after standing for 2 h at room temperature. After measuring the conductivity, the samples were boiled for 15 min to achieve 100% ion leakage (C2). Relative conductivity = C1/C2 × 100%.
Lipid peroxidation was estimated by measuring the malondialdehyde (MDA), according to the protocol of Micro MDA Assay Kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China).
Quantifying Leaf Ion Leakage and Lipid Peroxidation
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!