The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Micro mda assay kit

Manufactured by Solarbio
Sourced in China

The Micro MDA Assay Kit is a laboratory equipment designed to measure malondialdehyde (MDA) levels in biological samples. It provides a quantitative analysis of MDA, which is a biomarker for oxidative stress. The kit includes reagents and buffers necessary to perform the assay.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using micro mda assay kit

1

Quantifying Oxidative Stress Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The content of H2O2 was determined according to the method given by Gong et al. (2008) (link). H2O2 content was measured using the ELISA kit (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the instructions. The H2O2 content was calculated based on the standard curve.
The malondialdehyde (MDA) was determined according to the method of Zhang et al. (2007) (link). The concentration of MDA was determined using the colorimetric method of thiobarbituric acid (TBA) with Micro MDA Assay Kit (BC0025; Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microplate-based MDA Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The expression of MDA was detected with a micro MDA assay kit (Solarbio). Briefly, cells were incubated with thiobarbituric acid (TBA, 2.8% w/v) at 95°C for 60 min and then centrifuged at 4°C, 2,500 × g for 10 min. The reactive complexes were then detected using a NanoDrop One/Onec spectrophotometer at 532 nm (Thermo Fisher Scientific).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Measuring Oxidative Stress Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The levels of malondialdehyde (MDA) and superoxide dismutase (SOD) reflected the oxidative and antioxidant activities, respectively. The Micro MDA Assay Kit (Solarbio, BC0025, China) and SOD assay kit (Nanjing Jiancheng Bioengineering Institute, A001-3-2, China) were used to detect these two indicators according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Evaluating Fetal Brain Lipid Oxidation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To assess lipid oxidation levels in fetal brains, MDA levels were measured by the Micro MDA Assay Kit (BC0025, Solarbio) according to the manufacturer's protocol. The absorbance of each sample was measured at 450, 532, and 600 nm, and the MDA content could be calculated according to the protocol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Measuring Drought-Induced Oxidative Stress

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 3 days of NaCl treatment and 7 days of drought treatment, ten leaves were collected from each line and used to measure MDA content and REL. MDA was detected using the micro MDA assay kit (Solarbio, Bejing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The fresh weight (W) was determined for leaf samples, followed by homogenization in 1 mL extract buffer in an ice bath and centrifugation at 8000× g for 10 min at 4 °C. The supernatant was used to measure absorbance of A532, A600 and A450 with NanoDropTM OneC (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The MDA content was calculated using the following formula: MDA content (nmol g−1) = 5 × (12.9 × (A532 − A600) − 2.58 × A450) ÷ W.
The REL was measured as described by Yu et al. [57 (link)] with minor modifications. Leaves were sampled, rinsed with deionized water and dried with filter paper. A 0.3 g sample of leaf was placed into a 50 ml tube with 20 ml deionized water for 5 h. The conductivity (C1) was measured with a conductivity meter model DDS-11 (Biocotek, Ningbo, China). Subsequently, the samples were boiled for 15 minutes, cooled at room temperature and used to measure conductivity (C2) again. REL was calculated using the following formula: REL = (C1/C2) × 100%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Chlorophyll Content in Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The MDA content from plant samples was measured using Micro MDA Assay Kit (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each sample was replicated at least 3 times.
A total of 0.1 g of sample was ground with a small amount of quartz sand, calcium carbonate powder, and 2.5 mL of anhydrous ethanol and then transferred into a 10 mL centrifuge tube, and 7.5 mL of anhydrous ethanol was added. After centrifugation at 4 °C and 5000× g for 10 min, 200 μL of the supernatant was applied to determine absorbance at 665 and 645 nm. The chlorophyll content of the sample was calculated according to the simplified formula: chlorophyll content (mg·g−1, FW) = 0.663 A665 + 0.808 A649. Each sample was replicated at least 3 times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Measurement of Intracellular MDA Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Intracellular MDA levels in the cells were measured using micro MDA assay kit (Solarbio, China) following the instruction by the manufacturer. Briefly, the cells of each group were collected and disrupted by an ultrasonic cell pulverize. The cell suspension was centrifuged and then 100 μL sample was added for the measurement, followed by the addition of 400 μL of the MDA test solution. After mixing and reacting in a 100°C-water bath for 30 min, the mixture was cooled to room temperature and centrifuged. Next the supernatant was taken out and measured absorbance at 450, 532, and 600 nm wavelength with a full-wavelength microplate reader (Thermo, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Stress-induced Physiological Changes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The seeds of WT, atspt4-2-1, and OE10 were germinated on MS medium without or with 120 mM NaCl for 5 days, and then the whole plants were used for the measurement of proline and malondialdehyde (MDA) contents and antioxidant enzyme activity. Proline content was measured using a Proline Content Determination Kit (CAS: BC0295, Solarbio, Beijing, China). MDA content was measured using a Micro MDA Assay Kit (CAS: BC0025, Solarbio, Beijing, China). Superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity was measured using a SOD Assay Kit (CAS: BC0175, Solarbio, Beijing, China). Peroxidase (POD) activity was measured using a Micro POD Assay Kit (CAS: BC0095, Solarbio, Beijing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantification of Seedling Stress Responses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The H2O2 content of seedlings was measured by previously described methods [30 (link)]. Approx. 0.5 g of samples were cut into small pieces and homogenized in an ice bath with 5 mL 0.1% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA). The homogenate was centrifuged at 12, 000 g for 20 min at 4 °C. 0.5 mL of the supernatant was added to 0.5 mL 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and 1 mL 1 M KI. The absorbance of the supernatant was read at 390 nm. The content of H2O2 was determined by a standard curve.
Electrolyte leakage (EL) was calculated by measuring the conductivity [31 (link)]. Approx. 0.5 g of samples were cut into small pieces and transferred to 10 mL deionized water. The conductivity (C1) was measured after standing for 2 h at room temperature. After measuring the conductivity, the samples were boiled for 15 min to achieve 100% ion leakage (C2). Relative conductivity = C1/C2 × 100%.
Lipid peroxidation was estimated by measuring the malondialdehyde (MDA), according to the protocol of Micro MDA Assay Kit (Solarbio, Beijing, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Leaf Ion Leakage and Lipid Peroxidation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The upper leaves (3rd to 8th from the top) were collected from the WT P. × canescens and two PeGRP2-overexpressing lines, L-7 and L-8, after 15 days of NaCl treatment (0 or 100 mM). The REL was calculated from the initial relative conductivity (EC1) before boiling and the final conductivity (EC2) after boiling: REL (%) = (EC1/EC2) × 100% [7 (link)]. The MDA content was determined using the micro MDA assay kit (BC0025) (Beijing Solarbio Science & Technology, Beijing, China). Fresh leaves (0.1 g) were ground into a homogenate by adding 1 mL of extraction buffer and then centrifuged at 8000× g for 10 min at 4 °C, and the supernatant was collected. The absorbance values (ΔA) were measured at 532 nm and 600 nm using a microplate reader. The MDA concentration (nmol g−1) was calculated as 32.258 × (ΔA532 − ΔA600)/0.1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!