The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

4 protocols using anti pd l1

1

Multiparametric Flow Cytometry for Immune Cell Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For flow cytometry (fluorescence-associated cell sorting; FACS), analysis, cells were washed in staining buffer (SB) (2% FBS, 0,1% sodium azide in phosphate-buffered saline) and after a blocking of 10 min with SB+Ab serum 20%, were stained for 30 min with mouse monoclonal antibodies. The antibodies used were: anti-CD16, anti-CD107a, anti EGFR, anti-major histocompatibility complex type I (MHC-I), anti-PD-L1 (Miltenyi Biotec). Stained cells were washed two times, resuspended in SB and then acquired on a FACS ACCURI C6 (BD Biosciences). Analysis was conducted using ACCURI C6 software (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunomodulation Assay with PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Roswell Park Memorial Institute (RPMI) medium (Invitrogen) was used for the cell cultures. The following antibodies were used: anti-CD14, anti-HLA-DR, anti-CD3 (Immunostep), and anti-PD-L1 (Miltenyi Biotec). The LPS from Salmonella abortus was a kind gift from Dr. Galanos (Max Planck Institute of Immunobiology and Epigenetics). Carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) for the proliferation assays was purchased from Thermo Fisher. The lymphocyte stimulus pokeweed (PWD) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. To inhibit PD-1/PD-L1 interaction, a fully human IgG4 (S228P) anti-PD-1 receptor-blocking monoclonal antibody was used (Bristol-Myers Squibb). All the reagents used for cell cultures were endotoxin-free, as assayed with the Limulus amebocyte lysate test (Cambrex).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

FACS Analysis of PBMC Activation Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For flow cytometry (fluorescence-associated cell sorting, FACS) analysis, PBMCs were washed in staining buffer (SB) (2% fetal bovine serum, FBS, 0,1% sodium azide in phosphate-buffered saline) and, after blocking for 10 min with SB plus Ab serum 20%, were stained for 30 min with the following monoclonal antibodies: anti-CD107a, anti-TIM-3 and anti-PD-L1 (Miltenyi Biotec). Stained cells were washed two times, resuspended in SB, acquired on FACS ACCURI C6 and analyzed using ACCURI C6 software (BD Biosciences).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flow Cytometry Analysis of Dendritic Cell Phenotype

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For flow cytometry analysis of DC phenotype we used the following monoclonal antibodies (mAbs): FITC-labeled anti-CD1a (clone: HI149), anti-CD1c (clone: L161), anti-CD14 (clone: 63D3), anti-CD16 (clone: 3G8), and anti-HLA I (clone: W6/32) (all from Biolegend, CA, USA); Alexa Fluor 488-labeled anti-CD4 (clone: RPA-T4) (Biolegend); PE-labeled anti-CD11b (clone: ICRF44), anti-CD11c (clone: 3.9), anti-DC-SIGN (clone: 9E9A8), anti-CD80 (clone: 2D10), anti-CD83 (clone: HB15e), anti-CD86 (clone: BU63) (all from Biolegend), and anti-HLA II (clone: AC122), anti-ILT-3 (clone: REA141), anti-ILT4 (clone: REA184), anti-PDL-1 (clone: REA1197), and anti-FasL (clone: NOK-1) (all from Miltenyi Biotec). Briefly, variously treated DCs were harvested and collected by centrifugation. Antibody was added and the cells were incubated for 15 min in the dark, then washed twice and resuspended in 2% paraformaldehyde (PFA). Samples were analyzed on a FACSCalibur system (Becton Dickinson, Inc.). Data was analyzed with the CellQuest software (BD biosciences).
Endocytosis was monitored by flow cytometry after incubation of DCs with FITC-dextran (1 mg/ml), either on ice or at room temperature, for 1 h. The cells were then washed twice with DPBS and re-suspended in 2% PFA for future analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!