The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Chromomap kit with anti rabbit omnimap

Manufactured by Roche

The ChromoMap Kit with Anti-rabbit OmniMap is a laboratory equipment product designed for chromosome mapping applications. It provides a set of tools and reagents to facilitate the visualization and analysis of chromosomal structures and organization. The core function of this kit is to enable the identification and localization of specific DNA sequences or genomic regions on chromosomes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using chromomap kit with anti rabbit omnimap

1

Immunohistochemical Tumor Xenograft Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Xenografted tumors were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, paraffin embedded, and hematoxylin-eosin-saffron (HES) stained. Outgrowths were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for the expression of biomarkers. Immunostaining was performed on a Discovery XT Platform (Ventana Medical System, Tucson, AZ, part of Roche Diagnostics) with antigen retrieval using either EDTA buffer, pH 8.0 (CC1, Ventana Medical System) or citrate buffer 10 mM, pH 6.0 (CC2, Ventana Medical System). Primary antibodies were mostly monoclonal rabbit antibodies, and paired slides immunostained with rabbit IgG were used as negative controls. Incubation and color development involved anti-rabbit multimer secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase complex) with DAB (3,30-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride) as a substrate (ChromoMap Kit with Anti-rabbit OmniMap, Ventana Medical System). The IHC slides were scanned using a Pannoramic SCAN II (3DHISTECH). We then used the HALO software (Indica Labs) to quantify the expression levels of ER, pAkt (S473), and p-S6riboprotein (S235/6).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical analysis of PKD1 in breast cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded breast tumors samples, obtained at the time of initial diagnosis, were retrieved from the archives of the Department of Biopathology at René Huguenin Hospital. Sections of 3 μm in thickness were cut with a microtome from the paraffin-embedded tissue blocks of normal breast tissue, pre-invasive lesions and IBCs (invasive breast cancer). Tissue sections were dewaxed and rehydrated through a series of xylene and ethanol washes. Immunostaining was performed on a Dako automated system. Primary antibody against PKD1 (Cell signaling, Danvers, MA) was incubated overnight at 4°C (dilution 1/100).
Patient-derived xenografts were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin. Tissue sections were immunostained in a Discovery XT Platform (Ventana Medical System, Tucson, Arizona, USA, part of Roche Diagnostics) using EDTA buffer pH 8.0 (CC1, Ventana Medical System) for antigen retrieval. Primary antibody against PKD1 (Cell signaling, Danvers, MA) was incubated during 30 min at 37°C (dilution 1/100). After incubation with anti-rabbit secondary antibodies, slides were covered with the chromogenic substrate diaminobenzidine (ChromoMap Kit with Anti rabbit OmniMap, Ventana Medical System) and counterstained with hematoxylin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical analysis of RB1 and SLFN11

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Xenografted tumors were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Immunostaining was performed on a DISCOVERY XT Platform (Ventana Medical Systems, part of Roche Diagnostics). The slides were incubated with a monoclonal mouse antibody against RB1 (no. 9309, clone 4H1, Cell Signaling Technology) and a polyclonal rabbit antibody against SLFN11 (no. HPA023030, Sigma-Adrich). Slides immunostained with mouse and rabbit immunoglobulin G (IgG) were used as negative controls. Slides were incubated with anti-rabbit/mouse secondary antibodies (horseradish peroxidase complex) and DAB (3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride) as the substrate for color development (ChromoMap Kit with anti-rabbit OmniMap, Ventana Medical Systems). Immunostaining of RB1 was performed as detailed in previous works (14 (link), 28 (link)). Expression of SLFN11 was quantified with the H-score: Sections were scored for intensity (0 to 3+) and extent (0 to 100%) of staining. By multiplying intensity and extent of staining, each tumor was assigned an H-score (range: 0 to 300). We considered a tumor SLFN11 negative with H-score = 0, SLFN11 low with an H-score between 1 and 60, and SLFN11 high when the H-score was higher than 60.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Analysis of HORMAD1 in Xenografts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Xenografted tumors were fixed in 10% neutral‐buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Immunostaining was performed on a Discovery XT Platform (VentanaMedical System, Cambdrige, UK, part of RocheDiagnostics), as previously detailed [15 (link)]. The slides were incubated with a rabbit polyclonal antibody against HORMAD1 (SIGMA, #HPA037850). Slides immunostained with rabbit IgG were used as negative controls. Slides were incubated with an anti‐rabbit secondary antibodies (horseradish peroxidase complex) and 3,30‐diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB) as the substrate for color development (ChromoMap Kit with Anti‐rabbit OmniMap, Ventana Medical System). HORMAD1 immunostaining was assessed by determining the intensity and distribution of stained cancer cells. Expression of HORMAD1 was quantified with the H‐score: Sections were scored for intensity (0–3+) and extent (0–100%) of staining. By multiplying intensity and extent of staining, each tumor was assigned an H‐score (range: 0–300). We considered a tumor HORMAD1 negative with H‐score = 0, HORMAD1 low with an H‐score between 1 and 70, and HORMAD1 high when the H‐score was higher than 70, 70 being the median H‐score.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Xenograft Tumor Analysis of DNA Damage and Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Xenografted tumors were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, paraffin embedded, and hematoxylin–eosin (H&E) stained to differentiate the human tumor components from the murine stroma. Tumor tissues were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for expression of P-H2AXSer139 (Mouse Monoclonal Antibody, clone JBW301, Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA) and Ki67 (rabbit monoclonal antibody, clone E18-E, Clinisciences, Nanterre – France).
Slides immunostained with mouse and rabbit IgG were used as negative controls. Slides were incubated with anti-rabbit/mouse secondary antibodies (horseradish peroxidase complex) and DAB (3,3′-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride) as the substrate for color development (ChromoMap Kit with Anti rabbit OmniMap, Ventana Medical System).
P-H2AX scoring: homogenous nuclear staining and nuclei with 4 or more stained foci were considered positive for P-H2AX expression. For each tumor, the percentage of P-H2AX staining was evaluated in 7 different areas.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Quantification of Xenograft Biomarkers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Xenografted tumours were xed in 10% neutral buffered formalin, para n embedded, and haematoxylineosin-saffron (HES) stained. Outgrowths were analysed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) for expression of biomarkers. Immunostaining was performed on a Discovery XT Platform (Ventana Medical System, Tucson, AZ, part of Roche Diagnostics) with antigen retrieval using either EDTA buffer, pH 8.0 (CC1, Ventana Medical System) or citrate buffer 10 mM, pH 6.0, (CC2, Ventana Medical System). Primary antibodies were mostly monoclonal rabbit antibodies and paired slides immunostained with rabbit IgG were used as negative controls. Incubation and colour development involved anti rabbit multimer secondary antibody (horseradish peroxydase complex) with DAB (3,30-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride) as substrate (ChromoMap Kit with Anti-rabbit OmniMap, Ventana Medical System).
The IHC slides were scanned with Pannoramic SCAN II (3DHISTECH). Then we used HALO software (Indica labs) to quantify the expression levels of ERα, pAkt(S473) and pS6(S235/6).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!