The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using ab8191

1

Quantification of Tumor Cell Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Staining was performed on 6-µm frozen tissue sections from the tumor xenografts, as previously described [24 (link)]. A mouse monoclonal antibody against Ki67 (ab8191, 1:400, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) was used, and positive signals were quantified with the ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Analysis of ACAT2 and Ki67

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
IHC staining of paraffin-embedded tissues was performed with antibodies against ACAT2 (#ab131215; Abcam) and Ki67 (#ab8191; Abcam) and scored according to standard procedures. The staining score was determined by two independent pathologists at our center.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Tumor Angiogenesis and Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For histological analyses, tumor xenografts were fixed in 10% buffered formalin (Sigma) and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin sections were then processed for either hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining or immunohistochemistry. The antibodies used for immunostaining included Ki67 (ab8191, Abcam) and CD31 (ab28364, Abcam). Scoring of the expression of each marker was performed as follows: the percentages of Ki67+ and CD31+ cells were estimated by counting an average of 1,500–2,000 cells per sample from 3 randomly selected regions of the xenografts using ImageJ software. Vessel density was scored by counting the number of CD31 vessels per field from 4-6 randomly selected fields in the tumor, and the average was calculated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Skin Cell Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cultured HFs were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (China) for 24 h and then cut into 3-μm sections. After dewaxing, the sections were soaked with 3% H2O2 for 10 min and preincubated with normal goat serum (DAKO, Denmark) for 30 min. Then, the paraffin sections were incubated with primary antibodies against Ki67 (1:200, Abcam, ab8191, USA), β-catenin (1:200, Abcam, ab32572, USA), GSK3β (1:200, Abcam, ab32391, USA), p-GSK3β (1:100, Abcam, ab75814, USA), or androgen receptor (AR, 1:600, CST, #5153, USA) at 4°C overnight. Afterwards, the sections were incubated with secondary FITC- or CY3-conjugated goat anti-mouse/rabbit antibody for 50 min. Next, the sections were stained with 10 μg/ml DAPI (Abcam, USA). These sections were observed under an inverted fluorescence microscope (Nikon, Japan), and images were collected (FITC green excitation wavelength 465–495 nm, emission wavelength 515–555 nm; CY3 red light excitation wavelength 510–560, emission wavelength 590 nm). The relative expression levels of Ki67, β-catenin, GSK3β, and p-GSK3β were analyzed by the Image pro-plus 6.0 software: first of all, the immunofluorescence image is converted into a black and white image; then the integrated optical density (IOD) of the positive region is analyzed; afterwards, calculate the area of positive region (AREA); finally, mean density is obtained as follows: Mean density = IOD/AREA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Cell Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were lysed with RIPA buffer mixed with protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Total protein (25 μg) was separated by 10% SDS–polyacrylamide gel and then transferred onto a polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore). After being blocked in 5% non‐fat milk in Tris‐buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween‐20 for 1 hour at room temperature, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies as following: anti‐TRPV4 (ab39260; Abcam), anti‐Ki67 (ab8191; Abcam), anti‐IL‐6 (ab9324; Abcam), anti‐RANKL (ab45039, Abcam), anti‐osteoprotegerin (OPG) (ab11994, Abcam), anti‐phospho‐p44/42 MAPK (ERK1/2) (Thr202/Tyr204) (4370, Cell Signaling Technology), anti‐p44/42 MAPK (ERK1/2) (4695, Cell Signaling Technology), and anti‐glyceraldehyde‐3‐phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) (3683S, Cell Signaling Technology). Then, the membranes were incubated with a horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated mouse or rabbit IgG (1:5000; Zhongshanjinqiao), and protein bands were detected by enhanced with a SuperSignal West Pico Chemiluminescent Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The relative density of three comparable results was measured using ImageJ software. Each experiment was repeated three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mice tumour tissues were collected and made into 5‐μm paraffin‐embedded sections. Sections were dewaxed at 67°C, and then endogenous peroxidase was inactivated with 3% hydrogen peroxide methanol solution. Non‐specific antigens were blocked with 10% goat serum at 37°C for 1 hour. After washing thrice with PBS, sections were incubated at 37°C for 1.5 hours with primary antibodies, and then incubated with secondary antibody for 1 hour at room temperature. Then sections were washed with PBS and incubated with 3, 3′‐Diaminobenzidine (DAB; Sigma‐Aldrich) for 5 minutes in a dark room. After being washed with PBS, sections were then counterstained for 1 minute with hematoxylin (Sigma‐Aldrich). Permount Mounting Medium (Abcam) was utilized to mount the sections. Primary antibodies used were as listed below: rabbit anti‐SERPINE1 (5 μg/mL, ab66705; Abcam), rabbit anti‐p53 (20 μg/mL, ab1431; Abcam), rabbit anti‐MDM2 (1:100, ab131355; Abcam), rabbit anti‐cleaved Caspase3 (10 μg/mL, ab2302; Abcam) and rabbit anti‐ki67 (1:50, ab8191; Abcam). Secondary antibody was HRP‐labelled goat anti‐rabbit IgG (1:2000, ab205718; Abcam).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Staining of Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After euthanization of the mice, the tumors were excised and preserved in freshly made 10 % neutral formalin buffer for 48 h. Then paraffin blocks were prepared and sectioned for immunohistochemical (IHC) staining. IHC procedures were perfomed as follows: paraffin sections were kept in 60 °C for 15 min and then rinsed in fresh xylene twice, 10 min for each time, following by 100 % ethanol wash (twice, 10 min for each time). Antigen retrieval was applied by incubating sections with 10 mM citric acid buffer at 95 °C for 30 min. After permeabilizing with TBST (0.1 % Triton X-100), the slides were blocked with TBST containing 2 % BSA and 5 % goat serum at room temprature for 1 h. Then slides were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4 °C. After washing with TBST the slides were incubated with a secondary antibody for 2 h at room temperature. Slides were sealed with mount media containing DAPI (Invitrogen, ProLong dimand). Antibodies used in immunohistochemical staining were as follows: Ki67 (Abcam, ab8191, 1:100), CD31 (Abcam, ab28364, 1:100).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence Staining of Tissue Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence staining was performed as described previously.23 Tissue sections were double‐stained with anti‐CD146 (1:200, ab‐75769, Abcam) and anti‐Ki67 (1:200, ab8191; Abcam) or anti‐TRPV4 (1:200, ab39260; Abcam) antibodies. Other sections were stained with anti‐interleukin (IL)‐6 (1:200, ab9324; Abcam) and anti‐IL‐1β (1:200, ab9722, Abcam) antibodies. Next, the sections were incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate‐conjugated or tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate‐conjugated secondary antibodies (1:200; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories). Nuclei were counterstained with 4′,6‐diamidino‐2‐phenylindole. Confocal microscopic images were processed with LSM 5 Release 4.2 software following acquisition with a laser‐scanning microscope (LSM 510; Zeiss).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Proliferation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor tissues were fixed in 10% formalin (Sigma) at room temperature and embedded in paraffin. Paraffin-embedded samples were then processed for immunohistochemistry; Ki67 (1:100, 0.2 mg/mL, ab8191; Abcam) was used as a measure of cell proliferation. Scoring for the expression of Ki67 was performed as follows: the percentage of Ki67+ cells was calculated from three randomly selected regions of the samples by counting an average of 1,600–2,000 cells per slide using the ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Immunohistochemical Staining of Paraffin Sections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin‐embedded slides and tissue microarrays were dewaxed with dimethylbenzene (I and II) and gradient alcohol (100%, 95%, 85% and 75%). The antigen retrieval was performed by microwaving sections in citrate buffer for 2 minutes. Slides were incubated with 3% hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) for 20 minutes and then incubated with goat serum for 30 minutes at room temperature. Without washing, primary antibodies SQSTM1/p62 (1:1000; ab109012; Abcam), Ki67 (1:50; ab8191; Abcam) and caspase‐7 p20 (1:50; SC‐28295; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, DE, USA) were applied at 4°C overnight. Biotinylated anti‐IgG was added and incubated at room temperature for 1 hour. After incubating with streptomycin‐HRP for 30 minutes, the slides were stained with DAB and then counterstained with haematoxylin. After washing with flowing water, the slides were dehydrated with gradient alcohol and dimethylbenzene. Finally, the slides were sealed with neutral balsam and coverslips.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!