The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Uv spectrophotometer

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, Finland

A UV spectrophotometer is a scientific instrument used to measure the absorbance or transmittance of ultraviolet (UV) and visible light by a sample. It is designed to quantify the concentration of specific molecules or compounds in a solution by analyzing the absorption spectrum of the sample.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

112 protocols using uv spectrophotometer

1

DNA and RNA Extraction Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Next, the DNA of selected recombinant YhFF#8 cells was extracted based on the DNA extraction kit guidelines (ROJE Technologies, Iran), and its purity and homogeneity were evaluated utilizing the UV spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher, USA). The total RNA was also extracted from these cells through Riboex solution extraction guidelines (GeneAll, Korea). The purity and the homogeneity of the extracted DNA and RNA were evaluated utilizing a UV spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Cytotoxicity Assessment of Salvianolic Acid B

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, APExBIO, United States) was applied to determine the cytotoxicity of salvianolic acid B (SaB, Sigma Aldrich, Germany). Synovial fibroblasts from the frozen shoulder group were seeded onto 96-well plates at a density of 3,000 cells per well and cultured with various concentrations of SaB. Also implanted and grown without SaB were synovial fibroblasts from the healthy control group. Subsequently, 10 uL of the CCK-8 reagent was added to each well at 24 h or 48 h, or 72 h after seeding and used to quantify the cell number after incubating for 1 h at 37°C. All experiments were performed in triplicate. The absorbance at an OD of 450 nm was measured using a UV-spectrophotometer (Life Technologies, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of Nodal Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted by using the TRIzol reagent. After isolation, the concentration of purified RNA was determined by the UV spectrophotometer (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, United States). cDNA was reverse-transcribed from the extracted total RNA using the SureScriptTM First-Strand cDNA Synthesis kit (GeneCopoeia, Guangzhou, China). BlazeTaqTM SYBR Green qPCR Mix 2.0 (GeneCopoeia, Guangzhou, China) was used in ABI 7500 system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, United States) under the following conditions: 95 °C 10 min, 60 cycles of 95 °C 15 s, and 60 °C 1 min. The specific primers used were as follows: GAPDH forward: 5’-GCTCAGACACCATGGGGAAG-3’; reverse: 5’-TGTAGTTGAGGTCAATGAAGGGG-3’; Nodal forward: 5’-GGCGAGTGTCCTAATCCTGTTG-3’; reverse: 5’-CGTTTCAGCAGACTCTG-3’.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Free Radical Scavenging Ability Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DPPH free radical scavenging ability of test samples were tested according to previously reported procedures (Shah et al., 2015 (link); Zahoor et al., 2018 (link)). Samples solutions were prepared ranging from 125 to 1,000 μg/ml and were added to 0.004% methanolic solution of DPPH. Following incubation for 30 min, absorbance values were recorded at 517 nm using UV spectrophotometer (Thermo electron corporation, USA). DPPH scavenging activities were calculated as;
Where A0 characterizes absorbance of the control and A1 is the absorbance of test samples. Ascorbic acid was used as a positive control. Where A0 characterizes absorbance of control and A1 is the absorbance of test samples. All experiments were performed in triplicate and inhibition graphs were made with the help of GraphPad prism program (GraphPAD, San Diego, California, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluation of ABTS Radical Scavenging Potential

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ABTS free radical scavenging potential of Plant samples were tested following previously published procedure (Zafar et al., 2019 (link)). Briefly, solutions of ABTS 7 mM and potassium persulphate (K2S2O4) 2.45 mM were mixed and stored in a dark place at room temperature for about 12–16 h to obtain a dark colored solution. This solution was diluted using Phosphate buffer (0.01 M) pH 7.4 and absorbance value was adjusted to 0.70 at 734 nm. Finally, 300 μl solution of the test sample was added to 3.0 ml of ABTS solution in cuvette and was analyzed using a UV spectrophotometer (Thermo electron corporation, USA) at 734 nm. Reduction in absorbances was determined following 1 min of mixing the solutions and analysis was continued for 6 min. Ascorbic acid was used as a positive control. The assay was repeated in triplicate and percentage inhibition was calculated using the formula;
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay for Plant Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the determination of DPPH (2, 20-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) free radical scavenging ability of the extracts, Brand-Williams assay [26 ] was used with some modification. About 24 mg DPPH was dissolved in 100 mL methanol. Plant sample stock solutions (1 mg/mL) were also prepared in methanol. Using serial dilutions working solutions with the following concentrations: 1000, 500, 250, 125, 62.5 and 31.05 μg/mL were prepared. About 0.1 mL of each working dilution was mixed with DPPH (3.0 mL) and incubated at 23 °C for 30 min. Absorbance was measured at 517 nm via UV-spectrophotometer (Thermo Electron Corporation: USA). Ascorbic acid was used as a standard. Results were presented as Mean ± SEM. % DPPH scavenging potential was calculated by the following formula: %DPPHScavengingpotential=controlabsorbancesampleabsorbancecontrolabsorbance×100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

DPPH Radical Scavenging Assay for Essential Oil

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brand-Williams assay [22 (link)] was used with some modification to check the scavenging potential of essential oil of E. umbellata against DPPH (2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) free radical. To prepare DPPH solution, 24 mg of it were dissolved in 100 mL methanol. Approximately, 1 mg/mL stock solution of essential oil was also prepared in methanol and serially diluted to obtain the dilution having concentrations; 1000, 500, 250, 125, 62.5 and 31.05 μg/mL. Subsequently 0.1 mL of each dilution was mixed with 3 mL of DPPH solution. The mixtures were incubated for 30 min at 25 °C. Absorbance was measured at wave length 517 nm through UV spectrophotometer (Thermo Electron Corporation; USA) and ascorbic acid was used as a positive control. All the samples were analysed in triplicates and the results are presented as Mean ± SEM. Percent DPPH scavenging potential was calculated using the following equation:
Percent Scavenging potential=Blank sample absorbancesampleabsorbanceBlank sample absorbance×100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Free Radical Scavenging of Essential Oils

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Free radicals scavenging ability of the essential oil was determined following well established procedures [29 (link), 55 (link)]. Different dilutions (12.5, 50, 100, 200, 400, 800 and 1000 μg/ml) of essential oils (0.1 ml) were added to 0.004 % methanolic solution of DPPH. After 30 min, absorbance was measured at 517 nm using UV spectrophotometer (Thermo electron corporation, USA). Percent DPPH scavenging activity was calculated as; A0A1A0×100
Ascorbic acid was used as positive control. Where A0 characterize absorbance of control and A1 is the absorbance of the essential oils. All experiments were performed in triplicate and inhibition graphs were made with the help of GraphPad prism program (GraphPAD, San Diego, California, USA). Median inhibitory concentrations IC50 values were calculated using Microsoft Excel programme.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

DPPH Scavenging Potential of E. umbellata Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brand-Williams assay [34 (link)] was used to find out DPPH free radical scavenging activity of isolated compounds of E. umbellata. About 24 mg, DPPH was dissolved in 100 mL methanol. Compounds solutions (1 mg/mL) were also prepared in methanol. Working solutions were prepared using serial dilutions in the concentrations range of 1000, 500, 250, 125, 62.5 and 31.05 μg/mL. About 0.1 mL of each working dilution was mixed with DPPH (3.0 mL) and incubated at 25 °C for 30 min. Absorbance was measured at 517 nm via UV-spectrophotometer (Thermo Electron Corporation: USA). Ascorbic acid was used as a standard. Results are presented as Mean ± SEM that has been calculated using the formula:
%DPPH Scavenging potential=standard absorbancesample absorbancestandard absorbance×100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For DPPH free radicals scavenging activity the method of Brand-Williams et al. was followed with some modifications [49 (link)]. DPPH (24 mg) was dissolved in 100 ml of methanol to prepare DPPH solution. The stock solutions of plant samples were prepared in methanol having concentrations of 1 mg/ml and then diluted to the concentrations 1000, 500, 250 μg/ml. DPPH and sample solutions were mixed in a ratio of 1:1 and were incubated at 23°C for 30 min. Finally, absorbance was measured at 517 nm using UV spectrophotometer (Thermo electron corporation USA). Ascorbic acid was used as positive control. Percent radical scavenging activity was measured using the following equation;

+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!