The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

162 protocols using multiquant 3

1

Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemical structures were drawn using ChemBioDraw Ultra 12.0 (PerkinElmer Informatics, Waltham, MA, USA). The data acquisition was carried out with MultiQuant 3.0.2 and PeakView 2.1 from (ABSciex, Darmstadt, Germany). EICs were obtained with the use of MultiQuant 3.0.2 (ABSciex, Darmstadt, Germany), which created the base peak chromatograms for the masses that achieve a 0.01 Da mass accuracy width. The relative tolerance of the retention time was set within a margin of ±2.5%. Regarding the statistical analysis, the level of significance was estimated using Excel t-Test: two-sample assuming unequal variances.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Metabolic-Microbiome Profiling for Circadian Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MultiQuant 3.0.3 Software (AB Sciex) was used to integrate the data and calculate the concentration. Isotopically labelled standards were used for SCFA quantitation. For bile acid quantitation, we used Dehydrocholic acid as internal standard to correct for losses during sample preparation and isotopically labelled references to correct for ionization effects during measurement, according to the paper of Sinah et al. 202190 (link). For comparison between two groups, Mann-Whitney U test (two-sided) was used to test for statistical significance. Metabolite-microbiota correlation analyses were performed on relative abundance zOTU level within the rhythmic in male Bmal1fl/fl, but not Bmal1IEC-/- samples with at least a 30% prevalence. Spearman correlation and adjusted p-values between targeted metabolomics and zOTUs were calculated using the rcor() function in R. Correlation matrixes were visualized within the R package “corrplot” v0.92 (Wei et al., 2017). Only correlations were plotted with a p value of <0.05 and coefficient values R ≤ − 0.5 and ≥0.5. Furthermore, M2IA online platform92 (link) was used for the global similarity analyses (PA plot) between metabolome and microbiota data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Carotenoid Analysis via APCI-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectrometry was performed in an AB Sciex Triple Quad™ QTRAP® 5500 Mass Spectrometer equipped with an Atmospheric-Pressure Chemical Ionization (APCI) source on a positive mode for carotenoid analysis. Also, 5 mmol/L of ammonium acetate was added to the mobile phases for improving compound ionization, as well as the column temperature (25°C). The conditions for mass spectrometry were adapted from Etzbach et al. (2018) with the following modifications: entrance potential (EP), 10 V; collision energy (CE), 30 V; collision cell exit potential (CXP), 8 V; time, 50 ms; curtain gas, 10 (API); medium collision gas (CAD); ion spray voltage, 5500 V; temperature, 450°C; and arbitrary units for ion source gas 1 (GS1), 30.0.
A selective reaction monitoring (SRM) experiment was performed to identify the analytes, the first mass transition following two or three mass transitions was used to confirm the compound profile, and these transitions were determined by the literature [16 (link)] (see Table 1).
The major carotenoids (see Figure S1 in Supplementary Materials) constituent from HPLC-DAD-UV were focused on these evaluations, and the SRM identification transition selected was 569.00/551.00. The Analyst® 1.5.1 software (AB Sciex®) and MultiQuant™ 3.0.3 software (AB Sciex®) were used for data analysis.
See Figure S1 in Supplementary Materials for comprehensive carotenoid image analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MultiQuant 3.0.3 software (AB SCIEX) was used to process the mass spectrometry data, and the retention time and peak shape information of the standards were referenced to guarantee the accuracy of the qualitative quantification by integrating and correcting the mass spectrometry peaks detected in different samples for the analytes. PLS-DA was fulfilled viva Wekemo Bioincloud (Shenzheng, China). Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Serum Amino Acid Profiling via LC-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
50 µL of serum samples were extracted using methanol and dried under nitrogen gas. The dried extracts were derivatised with 3 M hydrochloric acid in butanol (Sigma Aldrich, USA) and diluted in water for analysis via liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC–MS). Deuterated stable isotopes of the respective amino acids were used as internal standards. Targeted analysis of amino acid was performed by LC–MS. LC–MS analysis were conducted on an Agilent 1290 Infinity LC system (Agilent Technologies, CA, USA) coupled with quadrupole-ion trap mass spectrometer (QTRAP 5500, AB Sciex, DC, USA). The samples were separated using a C18 column (Phenomenex, 100 × 2.1 mm, 1.6 μm, Luna® Omega). Mobile phase A (Water) and Mobile phase B (Acetonitrile) both containing 0.1% Formic acid were used for the chromatography separation. The LC run was performed at a flow rate of 0.4 mL min−1 with initial gradient of 2% B for 0.8 min, then increased to 15% B in 0.1 min, 20% B in 5.7 min, 50% B in 0.5 min, 70% B in 0.5 min, followed by re-equilibration of the column to the initial run condition (2% B) for 0.9 min. All compounds were ionized in positive mode using electrospray ionization. The chromatograms were integrated using MultiQuant™ 3.0.3 software (AB Sciex, DC, USA). The serum amino acids (AA) was measured in Duke-NUS Metabolomics facility, Singapore.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Barley Lipid Profiling by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LC‐MS/MS data were processed using MultiQuant™ 3.0.2 Software (SCIEX; Framingham, MA, USA), identified using an in‐house‐generated lipid database for barley (Yu et al., 2018). The data were normalized to the sample fresh weight. We compared the signal intensities of observed ions, expressed as peak area for each of the identified lipid compounds. Statistical analysis of the normalized lipid species was carried out using MetaboAnalyst (Chong et al., 2018). For multiple group analysis, univariate anova and Tukey's honestly significant different test were performed. For pairwise comparative analysis, Student's t‐tests were conducted on each individual lipid species/compounds to determine significant differences between two groups. For all analyses, adjusted p‐values using Benjamini‐Hochberg false discovery rate correction were considered (Benjamini, Krieger, & Yekutieli, 2006).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multimodal Bioinformatics Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Heatmaps visualizing cell death pathway component expression were generated using RStudio version 1.1.456 and gplots and RColorBrewer packages. A ranked list of fold differential expression was generated for human cell line RNA-seq data using Excel and analyzed by GSEA Desktop v3.0 (10.1073/pnas.0506580102 and 10.1038/ng1180). FACS data were analyzed and quantified using FlowJo 10.4.2. Cell Titer Blue viability assays were analyzed using Excel. MRI scans were quantified using Horos v3.3.5. Lipidomics measurements were analyzed by MultiQuant 3.0.2 software (SCIEX). Figures were assembled and data plotted and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 7 for Mac OS X.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of Dopamine Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Guide cannulae were implanted into the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and were collected as described previously [10 (link)] (see Supplemental Methods). DA in dialysate samples were analyzed by the Vanderbilt University Neurochemistry Core using liquid chromatography (LC)-mass spectrometry. Only animals with accurate probe placement that showed three consecutive stable baseline values (within ≤20%) were included in the statistical analysis. Prior to analysis, samples (5 μL) were derivatized with benzoyl chloride [28 (link)]. LC was performed on a 2.0×50 mm, 1.7 μM particle Acquity BEH C18 column (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) using a Waters Acquity UPLC. Mobile phase A was 15% aqueous formic acid and mobile phase B was acetonitrile. Samples were separated by a gradient of 98–5% of mobile phase A over 11 min at a flow rate of 0.6 mL/min prior to delivery to a SCIEX 6500+QTrap mass spectrometer (AB Sciex LLC, Framingham, MA, USA). Chromatograms were analyzed using MultiQuant 3.0.2 Software from SCIEX.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comprehensive Analytical Techniques for Ferroptosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Heatmaps visualizing ferroptosis and KEGG pathway component expression were generated using Instant Clue software [17 (link)]. FACS data were analyzed and quantified using the FlowJo 10.4.2 software. Cell Titer Blue viability assays and qPCR results were analyzed using Excel. Lipidomics measurements were analyzed by MultiQuant 3.0.2 software (SCIEX). IncuCyte experiments were analyzed by using the Software IncuCyte 2021A. Soft Agar colonies were imaged and quantified using ImageJ. Spheroid assay and organoid assay colony area and brightness were analyzed using the BZ-H4M/Measurement Application Software (Keyence). Figures were assembled and data plotted and analyzed using GraphPad Prism 7 for Mac OS X.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of Membrane Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HLM, S9 fractions, and hepatocyte cell membranes were analyzed using Sciex Triple Quadrupole 6500 system (Sciex, Framingham, MA) coupled to Acquity UPLC System (Waters Technologies, Milford, MA). Chromatographic separation of peptides was achieved on ACQUITY UPLC HSS T3 1.8 μm, C18 100A; 100 × 2.1 mm (Waters, Milford, MA) column. Skyline and Analyst 1.6.2 software were used to process acquired LC-MS/MS data. Detailed LC-MS/MS parameters have been previously published [2 (link)]. To address technical variability, we used heavy peptide internal standard as well as BSA for exogenous protein standard for all samples except enterocytes due to preexistence of BSA.
For donor-matched HIMs and three quality control samples digested using FASP protocol, LC-MS/MS analysis was performed using Kinetex C18 reverse phase column (100 x 2.1 mm, Phenomenex, Torrance, CA) and AB Sciex QTRAP 5500 system (Sciex, Framingham, MA). Data analysis was done using MultiQuant 3.0.2 software (Sciex, Framingham, MA). As individual HIM samples were quantified using FASP protocol, three HLM samples representing deletion, mid and high UGT2B17 abundance were used as quality controls and calibrators to address any technical variability.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!