The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Drosophila activity monitoring system dam

Manufactured by Trikinetics
Sourced in United States

The Drosophila Activity Monitoring System (DAMS) is a laboratory equipment designed for the continuous monitoring of locomotor activity in Drosophila (fruit flies). The system records and analyzes the movement of individual flies within their enclosures, providing precise data on their activity patterns.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

33 protocols using drosophila activity monitoring system dam

1

Drosophila Sleep Behavior Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The flies were collected following eclosion and placed on standard cornmeal agar media. Thirty-to-thirty-two 1–3 day post-eclosion male flies per genotype and drug group were individually collected under CO2 anesthesia and transferred into 5 mm × 65 mm polycarbonate tubes containing normal media at one end and a yarn plug at the other end. The behavioral recordings of fly sleep were collected using the Drosophila Activity Monitoring System (DAMS; TriKinetics Inc., Waltham, MA USA), which measures sleep on a 12 h light:12 h dark cycle. Drosophila activity is monitored by counting beam breaks over 5 min bins and averaged over 60 min to obtain a read-out of fly sleep/wake behavior, and sleep is defined as a 5 min period of inactivity recorded by the DAMS, as standard in the field [35 (link),36 (link),49 (link)]. Zeitgeber time (ZT) 0 is defined as the time of lights on, and ZT12 is defined as the time of lights off. Daytime sleep measures were from lights on to lights off (ZT0–ZT12), nighttime measures were from lights off to lights on (ZT12–ZT24), and total sleep measures were from the full 24 h period. Flies were placed in chambers/monitors for a total of 4–5 days. To allow time for the habituation of the flies to the chambers/monitors, analyses for daytime, nighttime, and total sleep were performed for the sleep recordings for days 3–4 for all the experimental groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Circadian Rhythm Analysis in Drosophila

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Locomotor activity was recorded using Drosophila Activity Monitoring System (DAMS, Trikinetics, Waltham) for 5 days in LD12:12 and 6 days in DD. Activity was counted every 1 min and analyzed in Excel using “Befly!” software (Department of Genetics, Leicester University). Lomb—Scargle normalized periodogram was used to determine rhythmic flies; individuals with period below 10 (confidence level 0.05) were regarded as arrhythmic. Flies, which did not survive until the end of experiments were removed from analyses. Every experiment was repeated three times, at least 60 flies in total were used.
Sleep analysis was performed on the second day of LD12:12, and sleep was recorded as at least 5 min of a fly immobility.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Circadian Locomotor Activity in Flies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Daily locomotor activity rhythms in male flies was assayed using the Drosophila Activity Monitoring System (DAMS, Trikinetics, Waltham, MA) as described previously90 . Young adult male flies (~3-5-day old) were entrained for 4 days in light/dark (LD) cycles (12h light/12h dark), followed by 7 days of constant darkness (DD) to assess their free-running rhythms in incubators at 25 C. Each fly was kept in 5mm glass tube that contains fly food, 5% Sucrose, 2% Bacto Agar (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), atone end and plugged with yarn at the other end. The locomotor activity data from individual flies were analyzed using the FaasX software (Fly Activity Analysis Suite for Mac OSX). Periods of each fly were calculated using the chi-square periodogram analysis and pooled for a composite for each genotype.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Drosophila Locomotor Behavior Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Locomotor behavior was assayed through three previously established methods: the Drosophila Activity Monitoring System (DAMS, Trikinetics)59 ,60 (link), video-assisted tracking61 (link)–63 (link), and gait analysis64 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Knockdown and Overexpression of Kinases in Drosophila

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To knock down or overexpress a kinase, timGAL4;UAS-dcr2 and UAS-dcr2;cry-GAL4-1655 (link) were crossed to RNAi lines and overexpression lines. For controls, UAS and GAL4 lines were crossed to the genetic background controls for TRIP, GD, and KK RNAi collections, w1118 and yw strains. Flies were reared on standard cornmeal–yeast–sucrose medium and kept in LD cycles at 25 °C. Locomotor activity levels of adult male flies were monitored by Drosophila Activity Monitoring System (DAMS, TriKinetics) for 7 days of LD followed by 7 days of DD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Drosophila Locomotor Activity Monitoring

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Drosophila activity monitoring system (DAMS; Trikinetics, Waltham, MA) detects activity by monitoring infrared beam crossings for each animal. These data were used to calculate locomotor activity using the Drosophila Sleep Counting Macro [72 ]. Flies were anaesthetized under CO2 and loaded into DAMS tubes containing standard fly food for acclimation. After 24 hours acclimation in DAMS tubes with food, baseline activity was measured for 24 hours. Tubes were maintained in a 25°C incubator with 12:12 LD cycles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Drosophila Circadian Locomotor Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All flies were reared at 25°C in 12 hr light: 12 hr dark (LD) conditions. Male flies (3–5 days old) were loaded into 65mm × 5mm tubes containing 5% sucrose 2% agar food medium. Locomotor activity was recorded using the Drosophila Activity Monitoring System (DAMS, Trikinetics) in 1 minute intervals. Temperature, light and humidity were controlled using a DR-36NL incubator (Percival Scientific). To suppress synaptic output of DN1a split Gal4 (R23E05 AD ∩ R92H07 DBD) and TPN-II split Gal4 (R60H12 AD ∩ VT032805 DBD), males were crossed to virgin UAS-TNT females, and male progeny were assayed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Drosophila Locomotor Activity and Sleep

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Males of 1- to 2-day-old were used for this experiment. They were placed in small tubes (φ = 5 mm) to record their locomotor activity and rest cycles in monitors of the Drosophila Activity Monitoring System (DAMS) (TriKinetics, Waltham, MA, USA; Nall et al. 2016 (link)). Each monitor housed 32 tubes/flies. The tubes contained the agar–sugar medium (5% sugar and 2% agar) that is commonly used in DAMS (Nall et al. 2016 (link)) at one end and the plug at the other end. The system recorded interruptions of the infrared beam emitted by the monitors that were caused by flies walking inside the tubes. The activity of the flies was recorded for 13 days: 7 days in LD12:12 and 6 days in constant darkness (DD). During recording, the monitors were kept in incubators with set temperature, humidity, and light conditions (Rosato and Kyriacou 2006 (link)). Data were obtained in 1 min bins. Since Drosophila sleep is identified as a period of minimum 5 min of inactivity (Huber et al. 2004 (link)), for sleep examination, each hour the 5-min bins of immobility (sleep) were examined. Sleep and activity analysis was performed using ShinyR-DAMS online software (Cichewicz and Hirsh 2018 (link)). The sleep phenotypes of the flies were determined based on the second day of activity recording in LD 12:12.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Drosophila Locomotor Activity Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Male flies around 3 to 5 days old were subjected to locomotor activity assays using the Drosophila Activity Monitoring System (DAMS) (Trikinetics, Inc.). Flies were entrained for four days at 12 hr light:12 hr dark (LD) conditions at 25°C before their free-running behavioral rhythms were assessed in total darkness (DD) for seven days. Fly activity monitoring using DAMS and data analysis using FaasX were as previously described [82 (link)]. Behavioral assays to rule out developmental effects of brm RNAi were performed at 29°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Sleep Fragmentation and Locomotion Analysis in Flies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For locomotion and sleep analysis, newly enclosed flies were collected and raised at 25°C, 60% humidity, on a 12:12 light:dark cycle for either 5–7 or 25–27 days. Sleep fragmentation was achieved by turning on the lights once an hour for 30 min during the 12 h dark cycle. This was repeated for a total of four nights. These were considered sleep fragmented flies. Another group of flies were exposed to the same sleep fragmentation regime but afterward were allowed to recover for 4 days on a normal 12:12 h day:night cycle. This was the sleep fragmented plus recovery group. The same light was employed for both the 12 h light cycle and sleep fragmentation during the dark cycle. The light used was a full spectrum bulb at 600 lux. Locomotor activity was collected using the Drosophila activity monitoring system (DAMS; Trikinetics) for 4 days at 25°C, 60% humidity, on a 12:12 light:dark cycle. Locomotor activity was collected in 1 min bins and analyzed with PySolo (Gilestro and Cirelli, 2009 (link)). Total sleep, average sleep length and average sleep bouts was calculated based on the standard sleep definition as a period of 5 or more minutes of inactivity. Flies were allowed to adapt to the DAMS system for 24 h before analysis was performed. The assay was repeated at least three times with 30 males used for each genotype (N = 90).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!