The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ppp fmr

Manufactured by Nanosensors
Sourced in Switzerland

The PPP-FMR is a laboratory instrument used for performing Ferromagnetic Resonance (FMR) measurements. It is designed to characterize the magnetic properties of thin film samples. The core function of the PPP-FMR is to apply a static magnetic field and measure the resulting microwave absorption spectrum of the sample, which provides information about the magnetic anisotropy and damping parameters.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using ppp fmr

1

Cantilever Stiffness and Tip Radius Effects on Young's Modulus Determination

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To study the effect of cantilever stiffness on the Young’s modulus calculation, we used three cantilevers with different spring constants (or stiffness): PPP-CONTSCR (Nanosensors, Neuchatel, Switzerland) as the softest cantilever with a spring constant of 0.2 ± 0.03 N/m, PPP-FMR (Nanosensors, Switzerland) with a spring constant of 2.8 ± 0.2 N/m as a moderately hard cantilever, and PPP-NCHR (Nanosensors, Switzerland) with a spring constant of 42 ± 3 N/m as the hardest cantilever, as summarized in Table 1, which are calibrated by using the thermal noise method [27 (link)].
To study the dependence of tip radius on the determination of Young’s modulus values, we used two cantilevers, PPP-FMR (spring constant of 2.8 ± 0.2 N/m, tip radius of 10 nm) and SD-R30-FM (spring constant of 2.8 ± 0.3 N/m, tip radius of 30 nm), with the same resonance frequency, length, width, and thickness.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Topographical Characterization of Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The films’ topographical characteristics were determined using an atomic force microscope (Park NX10, Korea), applying the no contact method and using an aluminum-coated silicone tip PPP-FMR (Nanosensors, Switzerland) with a resonance frequency of 286–362 kHz and a spring constant of 20–80 N m−1. Samples of 0.5 × 0.5 cm were analyzed, and three 1 × 1 μm areas were scanned at a speed of 1 Hz with a resolution of 256 × 256 pixels [47 (link)]. The image analysis and the roughness parameters Ra and Rq were obtained using the Smartscan program (Czech Metrology Institute, CZE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

AFM Characterization of PnBMA Film Surfaces

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM topographic
images of the PnBMA film surfaces after incubation in a buffer or
protein solution were obtained using an Agilent 5500 atomic force
microscope (AFM) working in a noncontact mode. AFM silicon cantilevers
(PPP-FMR, Nanosensors) with a force constant of ∼2 N/m, a resonant
frequency of ∼80 kHz, and tips with a standard beam shape and
small radius (<7 nm) were used. AFM micrographs were analyzed with
Pico Image software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Atomic Force Microscopy Protocol for Surface Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM images were obtained with a Nanotec Cervantes microscope (Nanotec, Spain) using silicon cantilevers (PPP-FMR Nanosensors, Switzerland) with a nominal 75 kHz resonance frequency and 2.8 N m−1 force constant. A long-range 70 × 70 m μm2 scanner was used to check for reproducible sample preparation and to obtain representative surface coverage values. Another 10 × 10 μm2 scanner was employed to collect accurate topographic and phase distribution data. The lever was oscillated (A0 ∼ 900 Å peak to peak) at its free resonance frequency. The amplitude was used as feedback signal with a setpoint (Asp) at Asp/A0 = 0.8. Both topographic and phase-shift images were recorded. Every sample was studied at four distant points using both scanners and images were acquired, processed and analyzed using the WSxM software.24 (link) Scanners were calibrated using NT-MDT TGT01 and Nanosensors H8 gratings for (XY) and Z directions, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Atomic Force Microscopy Analysis of DNA Bending

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All DNA and protein samples were pre-incubated for 20 min at room temperature and diluted 10-fold in 1× AFM buffer [25 mM NaOAc, 25 mM HEPES–KOH (pH 7.5) and 10 mM Mg(OAc)2] before being deposited onto a freshly cleaved mica (SPI Supply). The samples were then washed with MilliQ water and dried with nitrogen gas. The final concentration of DNA substrates on mica was ∼0.5 ng/μl and of protein was 30 nM. All images were obtained in the AC mode using a MFP-3D-Bio AFM (Asylum Research). Cantilevers (PPP-FMR, Nanosensors) with spring constants at ∼2.8 N/m were used. The images were collected at the scan size of 3 μm × 3 μm, scan rate of 1–2 Hz, and resolution of 512 × 512 pixels. The DNA bending angle was analyzed using either the Asylum software or a custom MATLAB code, which provide similar results. The MATLAB code determines the center of the DNA-bound protein by performing a 2D Gaussian fit in the vicinity of the highest point of the complex, followed by a sampling of the height along a circle around that point. The angle between the intersection points of DNA and sampling circle was determined by local Gaussian fitting in the vicinity of the two height maxima.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Nanomaterial Crystal Size Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Crystal sizes were determined using atomic force microscopy (AFM: Park NX10, Seoul, Korea), applying the no contact method and using an aluminum-coated silicone tip PPP-FMR (Nanosensors, PointProbe, Neuchatel, Switzerland) with a resonance frequency of 286–362 kHz and a spring constant of 20–80 N m−1. Samples of 0.5 × 0.5 cm were analyzed, and three 5 × 5 μm areas were scanned at a speed of 1 Hz with a resolution of 256 × 256 pixels [47 (link)]. A particle size of 20 particles was determined for each area of 5 μm × 5 μm, and the measurements were made on 5 different films and at 3 different areas of each one.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Fabrication of High-Resolution ML-MFM Probes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A series of ML-MFM probes were fabricated using magnetron sputtering (AJA International Aurora, ATC-2200) in Ar atmosphere. Commercial Si cantilevers (PPP-FMR, Nanosensors™) with typical resonance frequency f0 = 70–80 kHz, force constant = 2–3 Nm−1 and curvature radius of ~10 nm were chosen for coating. The coating was deposited on two faces of the pyramidal probe (Fig. 2a) and the ML-MFM probe was comprised of two Co layers separated by a Si interlayer (Fig. 1b). Two coating thicknesses were considered, i.e., Co(30 nm)/Si(10 nm)/Co(30 nm) for thick and Co(15 nm)/Si(10 nm)/Co(15 nm) for thin ML-MFM probe. The film thicknesses were estimated using SEM and material deposition rates measured on a flat surface. The final curvature radii were ~20 nm and ~35 nm for thin and thick ML-MFM probes respectively. For comparison, the curvature radius of commercial MFM probes (PPP-MFMR, Nanosensors™25 ) is ~30 nm. Detailed SEM investigations of custom-made ML-MFM probes revealed that the outer magnetic layer is longer, i.e., geometrically closer to the sample’s surface, than the inner one, see schematics in Fig. 1b. Furthermore, the orientation of the ML-MFM probe faces was within 2° of being perpendicular to the sample surface during scanning.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Atomic Force and Electrostatic Force Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AFM measurements were performed with a Bruker Dimension 3,100 V instrument in a tapping mode with a tip resonance frequency of ∼350 kHz. EFM measurements were carried out using a direct current (DC) bias voltage applied between doped silicon tip (Nanosensors PPP-FMR, 0.5–9.5 N m−1) and the underlying doped silicon substrate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Atomic Force Microscopy of DNA and Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All DNA and protein samples were preincubated for 20 min at room temperature, diluted 10× in AFM buffer (25 mM NaOAc, 25 mM Hepes–KOH (pH 7.5), and 10 mM Mg(OAc)2), and deposited onto a freshly cleaved mica surface (SPI Supply). The samples were washed with purified water (MilliQ) and dried with nitrogen gas. The final concentration of substrates deposited onto mica was ∼0.5 ng/μl and 30 nM for DNA and protein, respectively. All images were obtained using the tapping-mode in air on an MFP-3D-Bio AFM (Asylum Research). We used cantilevers (PPP-FMR, Nanosensors) with spring constants at ∼2.8 N/m and collected images at a scan size of 3 μm x 3 μm, a scan rate of 1 to 2 Hz, and a resolution of 512 × 512 pixels. The DNA-bending angle was analyzed using Asylum software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!