The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Metaserv 250

Manufactured by Buehler
Sourced in United States, Germany

The MetaServ 250 is a metallographic sample preparation system that is designed for the grinding and polishing of materials. It features a digital control panel for precise speed and pressure settings, and is compatible with a range of accessories to accommodate different sample sizes and materials.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

16 protocols using metaserv 250

1

Preparation of Lithium Disilicate Porcelain Cylinders

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lithium disilicate porcelain (IPS e.max CAD, Ivoclar Vivadent, Schaan, Liechtenstein) is presented in form of rectangular blocks to be milled by a CAD/CAM machine. The rectangular blocks were trimmed into a cylindrical shape with a diameter of 3 mm using a milling machine. A total of 40 cylinders (5 mm in diameter and 3 mm in thickness) of lithium disilicate porcelain were then obtained by sectioning the milled IPS e.max CAD cylinders using Isomet 4000 (Buehler, Germany) at speed of 300 rpm, as illustrated in Figure 4. The obtained cylinders were sintered (Programat P310, Ivoclar Vivadent) following the manufacturer’s recommendations. Sintered cylinders were finished and polished with P1000 and P1200 silicon carbide papers using grinding machine Metaserv 250 (Buehler Metaserv, Buehler, Germany) before ultrasonically cleaned in distilled water and dry-stored.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microhardness Analysis of Dentin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At the end of the pH cycling, the samples were sectioned longitudinally through the
exposed area. The samples were embedded in epoxy resin, with the cut face exposed.
The exposed surfaces were polished with 600 and 1,200 grit silicon carbide paper
(Saint-Gobain Abrasivos Ltda, São Paulo, SP, Brazil) in a polishing machine (MetaServ
250, Buehler Ltd., Lake Bluff, IL, USA) under water cooling followed by 0.3 μm
alumina paste applied over a felt disc using the same polishing machine. Next, the
specimens were ultrasonically cleaned. Subsequently, each sample was assessed with
the Knoop microhardness examination of the dentin, starting at 30 µm from the outer
surface, with indents at 30 µm intervals between 30 µm and 120 µm from the anatomical
surface. In each area, three measurements of Knoop microhardness were done, and the
distance between measurements was of 500 µm to prevent the marks from overlapping
each other. A static load of 10 g/15 s was applied.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Histological Preparation and Analysis of Metapodial Bones

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histological slides were produced following the standard protocol of our laboratory43 (link),99 (link). Mid-shaft blocks of each metapodial were embedded in epoxy resin (Araldite 2020) and sectioned using an IsoMet low-speed saw (Buehler). The exposed surfaces were polished using a grinder polisher (Buehler, MetaServ 250) and glued to a glass slide using the same epoxy resin. The mounted samples were cut using a diamond saw (Buehler, Petrothin) up to a thickness of 300 μm and grounded to 150–100 μm, using the grinder polisher. Finally, the slides were dehydrated in alcohol gradients and immersed in a histological clearing agent (Histo-Clear II) prior to cover them with a DPX medium.
The histological samples were studied under polarised light using a Zeiss Scope.A1 microscope with an attached digital camera (AxioCam ICc5). The slides were examined using a retardation filter of ¼ λ to improve the observation of the bone tissues and growth marks100 . The micrographs of the cortex were merged using Adobe Photoshop® and analysed with Image J software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Surface Energy and Shear Bond Strength of Y-TZP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 24 fully sintered Y-TZP cubes (10 mm length, 10 mm width, and 10 mm height) (LUXEN, DentalMax, Seoul, Korea) were prepared to analyze the surface energy and 160 fully sintered Y-TZP discs (5 mm diameter, 3 mm height) were prepared for shear bond strength. For all disc type specimens, all surfaces except for the top were embedded into an acrylic resin (Orthodontic resin, Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) to be treated (Figure 1a). All specimens were polished to 600 grit and 800 grit silicon carbide paper under water cooling using a grinding machine (MetaServ 250, Buehler, Lake Blu, IL, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Bovine Enamel Specimen Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A total of 224 sound bovine permanent incisors were stored in 0.1% Thymol solution for 1 week before processing to cut enamel slabs 5× 4 × 4 mm by a Precision Saw (IsoMet 1000, Buehler, Lake Bluff, Illinois, United States) under continuous water irrigation. The prepared enamel specimens were embedded in methyl methacrylate resin blocks. The surface of each specimen was grounded and polished using waterproof silicon carbide papers (1,200–2,400 grit; Allied High-Tech Product Inc, Compton, California, United States) attached to the polishing machine (Buehler MetaServ 250, Düsseldorf, Germany). Subsequently, acid-resistant nail varnish was used to create enamel windows 4 mm × 4 mm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Histological Sectioning of Dental Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Histological sections of teeth were prepared in our laboratory following standard procedures8 (link). In the case of extant species, teeth were firstly extracted from the mandible and dehydrated using different concentrations of alcohol for a total period of 72 hours (70, 96 and 100%; 24 h in each). With both extant and fossil samples, each tooth was then embedded in epoxy resin (Araldite 2020) and longitudinally sectioned at the level of the protoconid in the bucco-lingual plane using a low-speed diamond saw (IsoMet, Buehler). The cut surface was later polished using a Metaserv®250 (Buehler) and fixed to a frosted glass with ultraviolet-curing adhesive (Loctite 358). Each sample was then cut and ground with a diamond saw (PetroThin, Buehler) up to a thickness of 150 μm and polished again to obtain a final thickness of approximately 120 μm. Finally, the thin sections obtained were dehydrated again in increasing concentrations of alcohol, immersed in a histological clearing agent (Histo-Clear II) and mounted using DPX medium (Scharlau) to improve visualisation of the dental microscopic features. Due to the high height of equids’ crowns, most of the samples had to be mounted on two separate slides10 (link). The identification of incremental markings enabled confirmation of both slides being cut from the same plane (Fig. 1a).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Specimen Preparation for CAD/CAM and FDM-Printed Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All specimens were polished according to the following process: using silicon carbide papers with 320-, 400-, 600-, and 1200 grit for 5 min under continuous water cooling (MetaServ 250, Buehler; Illinois, USA). Then, specimens were cleaned with distilled water using an ultrasonic cleaner (PowerSonic 405, Hwashin; Seoul, South Korea), for 5 min.
The CAD/CAM milled specimens were polished before sintering. Therefore, they received no further polishing treatment following sintering. FDM-printed specimens were fully sintered then polished using the above-mentioned procedure. Because these specimens were fully sintered, it took significantly longer time and more effort to reach the fully polished surface.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Zirconia Specimen Preparation for Mechanical Testing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
30 bars (2 × 5 × 27 mm) for the flexural strength test and 20 discs (12 × 1.5 mm thickness) for the Vickers microhardness test were milled out of pre-sintered zirconia blocks (Ceramill ZI, AMANNGIRRBACH AG., Herrschaftswiesen 1, 6842 Koblach, Austria). Specimens then were polished using silicon carbide abrasive papers with 320-, 400-, 600-, and 1200 grit for 10 s under water cooling (MetaServ 250, Buehler; Illinois, USA). Then, specimens were cleaned with distilled water using an ultrasonic cleaner (PowerSonic 405, Hwashin; Seoul, South Korea), for 5 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Polished Aluminum Dolly Adhesive Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The aluminum dolly measuring 14 mm in diameter was polished with sandpaper of decreasing roughness (P400–P600–P1200–P2500) using a rotational polisher (Buehler Metaserv 250) at 400 rpm until an even appearance was achieved. The dolly was then dipped in the prepared adhesive and fixated to the bottom of the glass substrates. Curing was performed overnight, at 70 °C in the case of the reference polyurethane adhesive or at 90 °C in the case of the epoxy adhesives.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Glass Substrate Surface Polishing Procedure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A glass substrate was provided by Steklarna Hrastnik (model glass Tina 25, Hrastnik, Slovenia). To ensure the repeatability of pull-off tests, the glass substrates were firstly polished with P60 sandpaper in order to remove irregularities, followed by polishing with sandpaper of decreasing roughness (P240–P400–P600–P1200–P2500) to achieve a smooth surface. Polishing was performed using a rotational polisher (Buehler Metaserv 250, Buehler, Lake Bluff, IL, USA) at 400 rpm with the glass in alternating positions (four quadrants). The glass and sandpaper were rinsed with water following each change in polishing direction. Lastly, the substrates were polished using a 3 µm diamond suspension.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!