The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Genego

Manufactured by Thomson Reuters
Sourced in United States

GeneGo is a lab equipment product designed for molecular biology and genetic research. It provides essential functionalities for DNA and RNA analysis, including amplification, purification, and quantification. The core function of GeneGo is to facilitate nucleic acid-based experiments and investigations, supporting researchers in their scientific endeavors.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using genego

1

Isolation and Analysis of Muscle Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Myogenic cells from pharyngeal and hindlimb (gastrocnemius and quadriceps) muscles were isolated, sorted using FACS, and collected from 10–30 mice per experiment. Samples were sent to the Emory University Integrated Genomics Core facility for total RNA isolation using Qiagen miRNEAsy kit with on-column DNAse treatment followed by one round of amplification using NuGEN’s WT-Ovation Pico amplification kit. Analysis of genomic gene expression was performed using an Illumina Mouse WG-6 v2.0 Expression BeadChip. Data was extracted using the Illumina HiScan Scanner and iScan control software. Illumina Genome Studio 2011.1 software suite was used to normalize probe level intensity data with background correction using manifest MouseWG-6_V2_0_R1_11278593_A.txt. Detection p-values were calculated as the proportion of negative control probes with expression greater than the regular probe in question using Partek Genome Studio. The data discussed in this publication have been deposited in NCBI's Gene Expression Omnibus [42 (link)] and are accessible through GEO Series accession number GSE69418 (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE69418).
Data were further analyzed using both MetaCore genego (genego.com">https://portal.genego.com; Thomson Reuters) and Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (www.broadinstitute.org/gsea/index.jsp; Broad Institute).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Transcriptional Profiling of Uveal Melanoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted from 92.1 uveal melanoma cells using Qiagen’s Rneasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and screened for quality on an Agilent BioAnalyzer after 48hr treatment with vehicle, decitabine (1 μM), MEKi (10 nM), or combination. A Benjamini–Hochberg adjusted p-value of less than 0.05 was used as a cutoff to determine significantly differentially expressed genes. Significantly expressed genes were uploaded into GeneGo (Thomson Reuters, Eagan, MN). Data were analyzed for pathway analysis and significant interactions between uploaded gene IDs. Significant interactions between genes were visualized by Cytoscape using the degree sorted circle algorithm. Significantly changed genes were also uploaded into STRING, with interactions surpassing the most stringent threshold of 0.9 being exported and visualized by Gephi software using the OpenOrD algorithm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis for Subtype Identification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed by the metacore software (GeneGo, Thomson Reuters, New York, NY, USA). Analysis was based on gene transcripts significantly increased in one cluster compared to the others, as defined by Kruskal–Wallis followed by Mann–Whitney U‐test and adjusted P values (False Discovery Rate, < 0.01). Sets of genes associated with a functional process (pathway map or network) were determined as significantly enriched per subtype based on P values representing the probability for a process to arise by chance, considering the numbers of enriched gene products in the data vs. number of genes in the process. P values were adjusted by considering the rank of the process, given the total number of processes in the metacore ontology. Possible drivers of each subtype were identified by exploring the relations between subtype‐enriched transcripts and upstream regulators defined from the literature. P‐values were calculated for connectivity ratios between actual and expected interactions with objects in the data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Differential Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene expression data was analyzed using Array Studio (Omicsoft, V7.2). The data was normalized and a MAS5 report was generated for QC assessment. The ArrayStudio (V7.2), Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA, http://www.ingenuity.com) and GeneGo (Thomson Reuters, MetaCore version 6.19, build 65960) packages were used to identify differentially expressed genes (pFDR < 0.05; fold change >1.3 and <−1.3) compared with mock condition.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Transcriptome Analysis of Biological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ribonucleic acid from at least three biological replicates was independently collected as described above and its quality was assessed with NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific) and confirmed with RIN (RNA integrity number) at the University of Miami Center for Genome Technology (Miami, FL, USA). Amplification and processing for hybridization to GeneChip Human Gene ST 1.0 arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA, USA) were performed at the University of Miami Center for Genome Technology (Miami, FL, USA) following standard protocols. Data were normalized with Genespring 12.0 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and filtered by intensity. Probes between the 20th and 99th percentile range in at least two of three samples per condition were included in the analysis. Statistical comparison between conditions was performed using unpaired Student's t-test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction for multiple testing. Final data analysis was conducted using Excel software (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) and GeneGo (Thomson Reuters, Philadelphia, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Differential Gene Expression Analysis of Microarray Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raw expression data from microarray Human HT-12_v4_0_R1 Illumina platform was obtained for day 12 and was loaded on Bioconductor/R software and a probe level analysis was performed on them. The raw intensity data from the microarray was normalized using the Quantile normalization method, log (base 2) transformed, and scaled the median to 0 of all samples. An unpaired Student’s t test for two class comparisons was used to identify the significantly differentially expressed genes between the tested conditions. Two-sided Student’s t test was performed with confidence level = 0.95 with two variances being treated as unequal. Multiple testing corrections were not performed on the nominal p values. Probes for different genes were considered significantly differentially expressed for those with absolute fold change value (|FC|) ≥ 1.5 and nominal p value ≤ 0.05. Functional enrichment analysis was performed on significant genes using the MetaCore module on GeneGO web portal program from Thomson Reuters™ (NY).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Pathway-linked Drug Response Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this study, we did literature search of the NCBI PubMed database in order to manually examine pathways connected with drug response. To identify additional targets for pathway-linked regulation, we used a manually curated commercial database GeneGo (MetaCore package, Thomson Reuters, USA), and the MetaCore pathway analysis tool to visualize molecular interactions between the proteins. The manually curated functional molecular links between the top pathways and IC50 values are shown on Supplementary Dataset 12.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Gene Set Enrichment Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene set enrichment analysis was performed by the MetaCore software (GeneGo, Thomson Reuters, New York, NY). Sets of genes associated with a functional process (pathway map) were determined as significantly enriched based on P values representing the probability for a process to arise by chance, considering the numbers of enriched gene products in the data versus the number of genes in the process. P values were adjusted by taking into account the rank of the process, given the total number of processes in the MetaCore ontology.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Pathway and Network Analysis of Myotonic Dystrophy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pathway analysis was performed using Ingenuity Pathways Knowledge Base-v8.8 (Ingenuity Systems, content version 17199142, release date 17/09/2013) using Genes with LIMMA adjusted p-value <0.05 and -0.5>S.I.>0.5 as reference set and assuming direct and indirect relationships. Fisher’s exact test p-value<0.05 was deemed as statistically significant.
For network analysis, first, we built Metacore Networks (Analyze Networks algorithm, v6.13 build 43450, GeneGO, Thomson Reuters) using DMPK gene and Myotonic Dystrophy related genes as inputs for the algorithm (ACE, ATXN1, CDC42BPB, CNBP, CELF1, CAPNS1, DMPK, DMWD, DMD, INSR, CDC42BPA, FXYD1, TNFRSF1B, TNF, TSPAN7, TNF, TNFRSF1B) and looked for genes in our dataset that intersected the top-score sub-networks related to DM. Next, we created a core network of direct interactions amongst our LIMMA significant genes; we also expanded the network by adding genes outside our dataset, whose interaction is curated in MetaCore. We identified smaller network communities that were prioritized by number of genes in our dataset. We used this second approach to analyze our data set without any prior knowledge.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Identifying Biomarker Candidate Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differentially expressed proteins were further characterized using a the metacore™ 6.18 software package (metacore" xlink:type="simple">http://thomsonreuters.com/metacore, Thomson Reuters Co., New York, NY, USA) and an online database (genego.com" xlink:type="simple">https://portal.genego.com; Thomson Reuters Co.) in order to understand the underlying signaling pathways and protein-protein interaction networks, and to evaluate candidate proteins as potential biomarkers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!