The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ptfe syringe filter

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in United States, Ireland

The PTFE syringe filter is a laboratory filtration device designed to remove particulates from liquid samples. It features a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane that effectively filters out unwanted materials, ensuring the purity of the sample. The filter is compatible with a variety of solvents and has a consistent pore size distribution for reliable performance.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

22 protocols using ptfe syringe filter

1

Deproteinization and Sample Preparation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Serum samples were deproteinised by adding 1 vol. of 10% trichloroacetic acid containing 6.5 mM dithioerythritol. Afterward, samples were centrifuged at 12,000 × g at 4oC for 15 min and filtered through a 0.20 μm PTFE syringe filter (Merck-Millipore, CA, United States). Supernatants were transferred to high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) vials for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Kidney Metabolite Extraction and HPLC Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Snap frozen sections of kidney were weighed and homogenized with addition of
sodium acetate (100 mM, pH 4.65) using a Precelly 24-dual homogenizer (Bertin
Instruments, Montignyle-Bretonneux, France) in accordance with the manufacturer
instructions. Supernatants were transferred to a fresh microtube, and the
samples were deproteinised by adding 1 vol. of 10% trichloroacetic acid
containing 6.5 mM dithioerythritol. Afterward, samples were centrifuged at
12 000×g at 4°C for 20 minutes and the supernatant
concentrated using a Savant SpeedVacH Concentrator (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA).
Dried samples were resuspended in 10% trichloroacetic acid and filtered through
a 0.20 μm PTFE syringe filter (Merck-Millipore, CA, USA). Samples were then
transferred to high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) vials
for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Metabolites Extraction from C. lanceolata

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For metabolites extraction, 1 mL of water/ethanol (30:70, v/v) was added to 50 mg of dried C. lanceolata as extraction solvent. The sample was mixed for 2 min and ultrasonicated for 20 min at room temperature. The extracted solution was then centrifuged at 12,000× g rpm for 20 min, and the supernatant solution was filtered through a 0.2 μm PTFE syringe filter (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and transferred to LC-MS vial.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Trichoderma Extract Preparation and UPLC-MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For extract preparation of the 19 Trichoderma isolates, the culture media (60 x 15 mm) containing the fungal colonies, previously cultivated on PDA at 28°C for four days, were cut into small pieces and extracted with methanol (15 mL), vortexed for 1 min, maintained at rest for 5 min, and vortexed again for 1 min. After filtration, the supernatants were concentrated to approximately 1 mL, lyophilized, and stored at -47°C until use. For analyses by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UPLC-ESI-Q-TOF-MS), lyophilized samples were reconstituted in a solution containing water/methanol/acetonitrile (1:2:2 v/v/v, 1 mL). The samples were vortexed for 1 min, sonicated for 30 min at room temperature, filtered using a 0.22 μm PTFE syringe filter (Millipore, USA), and transferred to vials for LC–MS analysis [35 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Hydrophobic Au/Ag Nanoparticle Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The hydrophobic Au/Ag NCs were prepared by reacting the phosphinated Au11 nanoclusters with the Ag(I)-SR complex described above.23 Our purification scheme was slightly different from those described in the literature,23 though. Instead of passing the prepared clusters through sephadex LH20 column, we precipitated the insoluble by-products by centrifugation, collecting the green supernatant, which was further passed through a 0.45 μm PTFE syringe filter (Millipore). The NC dispersions were stored as collected at 4 °C in ethanol until further use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Impurity Profiling of Benzoate Formulations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The gel sample, placebo matrix, working standards of ADP, and BPO were provided by Dr. Reddy’s Lab, India. Benzoic acid (BA), benzaldehyde (BZ), and ethyl benzoate (EB) were provided by SD Fine Chemicals, India. Impurity-A, Impurity-C, and Impurity-D were used from the United States Pharmacopeia, European Pharmacopeia, and Toronto Research Lab Reference Standard, respectively. HPLC grade acetonitrile, HPLC grade methanol, and glacial acetic acid were used (Rankem, Delhi, India). A nylon membrane filter (0.22 µm), PTFE syringe filter (0.45 µm), and nylon syringe filter (0.45 µm) were from Millipore, Mumbai, India. Water for HPLC was generated using the Milli-Q Plus water purification system (Millipore, Milford, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of Encapsulated Ursolic Acid

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The freshly prepared formulation was diluted in milli-Q water (1:5), filtered through a 5 µm nitrocellulose membrane filter (Millipore, Ireland), and diluted 1:10 in ethanol to extract UA from NLC. The mixture was centrifuged at 4620× g at 25 °C for 15 min (Thermo Scientific Heraeus Multifuge X1R Refrigerated Benchtop Centrifuge, Indianapolis, IN, USA), the supernatant collected, and filtered through a 0.45 µm PTFE syringe filter (Millipore, Ireland). The supernatant was diluted (1:6) in eluent solution and applied to the HPLC column and the amount of UA released quantified. The encapsulation efficiency (EE) was calculated according to the following equation: EE %=Amount of UA in the filtered formulationTotal amount of UA×100
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of trans-p-Hydroxycinnamic Acid

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Standard solution of trans-p-hydroxycinnamic acid: the stock solution of trans-p-hydroxycinnamic acid was diluted with 40% (v/v) methanol to obtain 6 standard solutions at 11.0, 22.0, 44.0, 88.0, 176.0, and 352.0 μg·mL−1 and filtered through a 0.45 μm PTFE syringe filter (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) before HPLC analysis.
Test solution of original extract: the original extracting solution of L. robustum was diluted with 40% (v/v) methanol and percolated using a 0.45 μm PTFE syringe filter prior to HPLC measurement.
Test solution of hydrolyzed extract: 1 mL sodium hydroxide aqueous solution (1 M) and 1 mL the extracting solution of L. robustum were mixed and incubated at 80 °C for 2 h [26 (link)], and then, 1 mL hydrochloride (1 M) solution was added. After it cooled down to room temperature, the above mixture solution was transferred to 10 mL volumetric flask, and the volume was filled with 40% (v/v) methanol. The diluted solution was filtered with a 0.45 μm PTFE syringe filter prior to HPLC determination.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Comparative Analysis of Sunscreen Formulations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sunscreen cream Sunmate SPF 30+ gel cream from Palsons Derma Pvt. Ltd. and Photoderm MAX SPF50+ from Bioderma, respectively, used for analysis. Pure drug sample bemotrizinol was kindly supplied as a gift sample by Palsons Derma Pvt. Ltd. The sample is used without further purification. HPLC grade methanol, chloroform was procured from Merck, Qualigen, and Spectrochem, Rankem, respectively. 0.2 µm PTFE syringe filter, and also 0.2 µm nylon syringe filter were procured from Millipore.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Moringa Phenolic Compounds Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extraction and analysis of phenolic compounds were carried according to the protocol described by [17] (link). To the 0.1 g of each fine moringa powder sample, 3 mL of aqueous MeOH solution (80%) was added and vortexed for 1 min, which was then sonicated for 1 h at 37 • C. After that, the mixture was centrifuged at 4 • C for 15 min at 10,000 rpm. The clear supernatants were passed through a 0.45 µm PTFE syringe filter (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) into amber glass vials (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The HPLC machine, mobile phase, gradient program, identification, and quantification of the phenolic compounds were similar to the protocol described in [22] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!