The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Excel 2003

Manufactured by IBM
Sourced in United States

Excel 2003 is a spreadsheet software application developed by Microsoft. It provides users with a tool to organize, analyze, and manipulate data in a tabular format. Excel 2003 allows users to create and format spreadsheets, perform calculations, and generate charts and graphs.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

49 protocols using excel 2003

1

Groundwater Nitrate Concentration Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The data was input into Excel 2003 for sorting, and the results were analyzed by SPSS19.0 statistical software. The statistics use descriptive analysis, χ2 test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to analyze the relationship between other chemicals in groundwater and nitrate concentration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Analyzing Protozoan Diversity in Beta vulgaris Rhizosphere

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Microsoft Excel 2003 software, SPSS20.0 statistical software, Origin 8.0 software, PRIMER 7.0 multivariate analysis software and R were used for data processing and correlation analysis of experimental data. R software packages used include maptools, ggplot2, mapproj, pheatmap, and corrplot. The SIMPER subroutine of PRIMER multivariate statistical software was used to calculate and rank the abundance and contribution rate of identified protozoa species in each soil layer. Spearman correlation analysis and biota-environment (BIOENV) analysis were carried out on protozoan abundance detected in Beta vulgaris L. rhizosphere soil and physicochemical properties. The community diversity indices used included the Shannon–Wiener index (H’), Pielou evenness index (J) and Margalef species richness index (d) [27].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparative ANOVA Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were run using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with three replicates according to Excel 2003, SPSS 17.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The Duncan’s new Multiple Range (DMR) test at 5% probability level was used to test the differences among the mean values. Significant differences were labelled based on DMR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Data Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 2003 and SPSS Statistics 17.0 software. The mean, standard deviation and coefficient of variation were calculated by Microsoft Excel 2003. Drawing was performed using Origin 8.0 software. Image processing was performed using ERDAS IMAUINE 9.2 software, Adobe Photoshop CS6 and Image-Pro plus 6.0 software. The least significant difference (LSD) method was used for multiple comparisons by SPSS Statistics 17.0 software. The LSD test uses the square root of the residual mean square from the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and considers it to be the pooled significant difference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Two-Way ANOVA for Treatment Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dependent variables were checked for normality and homoscedasticity and transformed as necessary. Data analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 2003 (mean values ± standard deviation) and the SPSS 13.0 software package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL). The analysis of variance using two-way ANOVA was conducted on the interaction between treatments and sampling time, while one-way ANOVA was applied to evaluate the differences among treatments within one sampling time and within the two sampling times. Separation of means was performed by post hoc test (Tukey’s test), and significant differences were accepted at the levels p ≤ 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Correlation of BP Changes and Age

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were processed in Excel 2003 and analyzed with SPSS10.0. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ±SD. The t-test and the analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used for the statistical analysis. Lineal regress analysis was performed for the correlation between ΔD/D0 and BP parameters, as well as the correlations of ΔD/D0 and ΔBPl-r with age or baseline BP levels. A value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genotype-Dependent In-Stent Restenosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were collected in Microsoft Excel 2003 and were analysed with SPSS 13.0 for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, USA) software. Categorical variables were reported as absolute numbers and percentages, and continuous variables as medians and interquartile ranges. We used the t-test to compare continuous variables between groups, whereas for continuous nonparametric variables we used the Mann–Whitney U-test. Categorical values were compared by using the chi-square test. Multivariate logistic regression has been performed with adjustment for generally known risk factors and MBL variant genotype (A/O + O/O) with in-stent restenosis as a dependent variable, independent variables were entered into the equation simultaneously. The genotype frequency was tested for deviation from Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium by using Pearson’s chi-square test. All analyses were performed two-tailed, and p < 0.05 was considered as significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Factors Influencing Non-Invasive Ventilation Failure

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The demographic and clinical quantitative data of the patients were described with the use of centralization and dispersion measures and the qualitative data were described using absolute and relative frequencies. The success or failure of NIV was described according to each characteristic of interest. Chi-square tests were used to assess the association of success or failure for the qualitative characteristics and Mann–Whitney or Student’s t tests for the quantitative characteristics. Simple logistic regression was employed to estimate the odds ratios (OR) of each variable of interest with the occurrence of failure, with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
A multiple logistic regression model was estimated to identify the factors that jointly influence the occurrence of NIV failures, select the variables that in the bivariate tests presented levels of significance below 0.10 (p < 0.10), and use only variables with a significance level lower than 0.05 (p < 0.05) in the final model.
All tests were performed with a significance level of 5%. The software packages used were Excel 2003 and SPSS 20.0. To calculate the sample size, a 5% single-tailed alpha error and a 20% beta error were considered, without taking dropouts into account. The rate of NIV failure considered was 40%. Thus, the calculated sample size was 170 subjects.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Replicates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were the average of three replicates. The mean of the data and standard deviation (±SD) were calculated using Microsoft Excel 2003, and significant differences were analysed using the SPSS16.0 statistical analysis software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

One-Way ANOVA Analysis of Treatments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All data were analyzed and processed using Excel 2003 and SPSS 10.0 software. One-way ANOVA was employed to calculate the difference in the mean value of each treatment. The mean value is recorded as “mean ± standard error (S.E.).” Duncan's new complex range method was employed to examine the significance of the difference among all treatments (P < 0.05).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!