The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using ab124699

1

Immunostaining of Transdifferentiated Fibroblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde and permeabilized with 1% Triton in PBS. Primary antibody against DUX4 (Abcam ab124699) was diluted 1:2000 in PBS and primary antibody detecting MYH1E (MF20, Hybridoma Bank, Iowa University) was diluted 1:1000 in PBS. Secondary antibodies Alexa 488 conjugated anti-rabbit (A21206, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and Alexa 594 conjugated anti-mouse (A21203, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) were diluted 1:500 in PBS. Visualization of nuclei was achieved by incubation with DAPI (4′,6-Diamidine-2′-phenylindole dihydrochloride, Sigma-Aldrich, 268298) diluted 1:1000 in PBS. Transdifferentiated fibroblasts (Figure 5C) were imaged with Thermo Cellomics Arrayscan@ VTI HCS Reader and 500 images per cell line were taken at 20× magnification. Number of nuclei in myotubes were determined by analyzing images with a custom made colocalization program in HCS studio software. Number of DUX4 positive nuclei was determined by manual screening of all images. Primary myoblast cultures shown in Figure 2E were imaged with Nicon Eclipse Ti microscope equipped with A1 confocal detector at 20× magnification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying DUX4 and LEUTX mRNA in FSHD2 Myoblasts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
FSHD2-2 myoblasts were seeded in micro-slide eight-well plates at ~8x104 cells per well, and differentiation was initiated ~20hrs later. After 3 or 7 days, as indicated, of differentiation, cells were fixed with 10% neutral buffered formalin at room temperature for 30 min, and the RNA FISH experiments were performed using the RNAScope fluorescent Multiplex system (Advanced Cell Diagnostic Inc.) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For costaining of immunofluorescent (IF) staining and RNAScope, cells were permeabilized with 0.5% Triton X-100 for 5 min at 4°C between fixation and dehydration process, then DUX4 (Abcam, ab124699) IF was performed as previously described [40 (link)]. Probe-Hs-DUX4-C1, Probe-Hs-LEUTX-C2, were custom-designed to avoid crossreactivity to related homologs (for DUX4 probe set, see S11A Fig). Probe-Hs-SLC34A2-C3 was also used. Images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM 510 META confocal microscope. A technical consideration should be made that due to the process of IF and RNAScope costaining that much of the cytoplasmic RNAScope signal is washed out.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Muscle Histology and Immunocytochemistry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Muscle physiology (extensor digitorum longus muscles), histology, and immunocytochemistry (tibialis anterior muscles) were performed as described [15 (link)]. Primary antibody against DUX4, E5-5 (Abcam, ab124699) was used at 1:200 dilution. A series of 10 non-consecutive sections were imaged using the Leica DMi8, DFC365 FX camera, and LAS X Expert software (Leica Microsystems Inc.). Representative images from n = 3–4 animals per group are shown.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

In Situ Protein Interaction Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In situ proximity ligation assay (PLA) is suitable for quantification of protein expression and for characterization of modifications and interactions of proteins [42 (link), 43 (link)]. PLA assay was performed using Duolink® PLA Fluorescence (Merck, Darmstadt, Hessen, Germany) according to manufacturer's instruction. In brief, the Reh cells expressing DUX4/IGH or mutants were transfected with LEGO‐iG2 vector containing recombination‐activating gene 1/2 (RAG1/2). The cells were harvested and attached to coverslips through centrifugation (700 rpm, 5 min). The antibodies of DUX4/IGH (bs‐12369R, 1:500 dilution, Bioss, Shanghai, China; ab124699, 1:1500 dilution, Abcam) and RAG1/2 (sc377127 and sc517209, 1:500 dilution, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) were incubated, then staining with the PLA probes (secondary antibody, one PLUS and one MINUS). If the target proteins interacted with each other, the DNA could be amplified and visualized by fluorescently labeled complementary oligonucleotide probes. The number and intensity of the dots were detected by fluorescence microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Immunofluorescence Validation of DUX4 and LEUTX

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence was performed using rabbit polyclonal antibodies specific for DUX4 (ab124699, Abcam) and LEUTX (PA5–59595, Thermofisher). DUX4 shRNA treatment reduced this DUX4 antibody staining by ~80%, supporting the specificity (data not shown). The recombinant DUX4 expression plasmid (pCS2-mkgDUX4) was a gift from Dr. Stephen Tapscott (Addgene plasmid # 21156) (Snider et al., 2009 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

DUX4 Protein Immunoprecipitation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Nuclear lysates were prepared as for co-IP/mass spectrometry analysis except that lysates were precleared with 5 μg of mouse IgG1 isotype control (02-6100, Thermo Fisher Scientific), and precipitations were performed with 4 μg of anti-DUX4 C-2 antibody or 4 μg of isotype control. Western blots were performed by separating samples on 12% Bolt Bis-Tris Plus precast gels (no. NW00122BOX, Thermo Fisher Scientific) in Mops buffer (NP0001-02, Invitrogen), transferring to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes, and probing according to standard methods. Blots were probed with 1:1000 dilutions of anti-C1QBP (A302-862A, Bethyl Laboratories) or anti-DUX4 clone E5-5 (ab124699, Abcam) antibodies, and enhanced chemiluminesence was performed using a mouse anti-rabbit–horseradish peroxidase secondary antibody (31464, Thermo Fisher Scientific), a SuperSignal West Femto kit (34094, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and a ChemiDoc MP Imaging system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Antibody Characterization for DUX4 and FAIM2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Antibodies used included rabbit anti-DUX4 1:50 (MAB95351, R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), mouse anti-DUX4 1:500 (9A12, gift of A. Belayew), rabbit anti-DUX4 1:1000 (ab124699, Abcam, Cambridge MA), rabbit anti-FAIM2 1 µgm/ml (AS-54488, Anaspec, Fremont, CA), rabbit anti-FAIM2 1:500 (LS-C404955-200, LifeSpan Biosciences, Seattle, WA), rabbit anti-FAIM2 1:500 (TA306043, OriGene, Rockville, MD), Mouse Anti-MyoD (554130, BDbiosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), Mouse anti-Myogenin (556358, BDbiosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), HRP-conjugated anti-GAPDH 1:5000 (HRP-600004, Proteintech Rosemont, IL), secondary HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit 1:10,000 (111-035-003, Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA), secondary HRP-conjugated anti-mouse 1:5,000 (NB1-75130, Novusbio, Centennial, CO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Western Blot Analysis of CIC-DUX4 Fusion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells lines were maintained in standard growth media until 80% confluency. Using Trypsin-EDTA, the cells were lifted, collected in Hank’s Balanced Salt Solution, and then pelleted by centrifugation (300xg for 3 minutes). Lysates were made using RIPA buffer (supplemented with 1% SDS, HALT protease inhibitor (Thermo Fisher Scientific), and Benzonase) and quantified with Pierce BCA protein assay kits. Heat-denatured proteins were loaded onto a 10% Bis-Tris gel, run at 150–200v in 1x MES buffer, and then wet-transferred at 350mA for 1 hour at 4°C. Importantly, all above steps were completed same-day due to the transient and unstable nature of the fusion. The CIC-DUX4 fusion (~260kD) was probed using an anti-HA antibody (Cell Signaling, 3724) at 1:1000 dilution and anti-DUX4 antibody (Abcam, ab124699) at 1:1000. Cre was detected using an anti-Cre antibody (Cell Signaling, 15036) at 1:1000 dilution with B-actin (Sigma, A1978) as a loading control. Images were acquired on a LI-COR Odyssey CLx and processed using the Image Studio Software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

DUX4 Immunostaining and Apoptosis Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were permeabilized with PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100, rinsed in PBS, and
blocked in 1% BSA. Primary antibody against DUX4 (Abcam, ab124699) was diluted in
blocking buffer at 1:500, and secondary anti-Rabbit TRITC (Jackson ImmunoResearch,
711-025-152) was diluted in blocking buffer at 1:400. For assaying apoptosis in
DUX4-cells, Image-iT LIVE Red Poly Caspases Detection Kit (Life
Technologies, I35101) was used. For both experiments, fluorescently labeled cells
were then viewed under the ZEISS Axiophot fluorescence microscope. For each sample,
pictures from eight random fields were taken. ImageJ (Fiji) was used for image
analysis and quantification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Myogenic Differentiation via Fusion Index

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After 1, 2, 3, and 4 days of myogenic differentiation, the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature, permeabilized in 2% Triton for 10 min, then washed with PBS. Immunostaining was performed overnight at 4°C with a 1:2000 dilution of DUX4 E5.5 rabbit monoclonal antibody (ab124699, Abcam) in PBS, a 1:250 dilution of MF20 antibody against myosin heavy chain (MYH1E (MF20, DSHB). Cells were washed and labeled with fluorescent-conjugated Alexa 488 or Cy3 anti-rabbit or anti-mouse secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature, then washed again. The images were acquired on a Dragonfly 500 Confocal Microscope System using an immersion lens under 60× magnification. A fusion index was calculated for each image with CellProfiler software (v2.1.1) using a custom made analysis pipeline. In short, individual nuclei and larger nuclei clusters were segmented based on Hoechst staining and were identified based on shape and size (see Supplementary Fig. S1). Fusion index was defined as the percentage of individual nuclei located in a nuclei cluster of > 2 nuclei in size. A threshold of > 2 nuclei was used to reduce the false positive labeling of multinucleated myotube nuclei due to a possible slight oversegmentation of the individual nuclei.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!