The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dm il led inverted phase contrast microscope

Manufactured by Leica
Sourced in Germany

The Leica DM IL LED inverted phase contrast microscope is a high-performance laboratory equipment designed for advanced microscopy applications. It features an LED illumination system and phase contrast capabilities, providing clear and detailed images of samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using dm il led inverted phase contrast microscope

1

Cytocompatibility and Photothermal Therapy of MoS2-PVP Nanosheets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A typical Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay was used to study the in vitro cytocompatibility of the MoS2-PVP nanosheets. In brief, L929 and HT29 cells at a seeding density of ∼8 × 103 cells/well were dispersed in 100 μL of the corresponding medium and added to individual wells of a 96-well plate. The cells were then incubated with fresh medium containing a pre-determined concentration of MoS2 nanosheets. After 24 h of incubation, the cellular metabolic activity was determined with the CCK-8 kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cellular morphology was also observed with a Leica DM IL LED inverted-phase contrast microscope to evaluate the viability of the L929 and HT29 cells qualitatively.
For the in vitro PTT, ∼8 × 103 HT29 cells dispersed in 100 μL RPMI 1640 medium were pipetted into individual wells of a 96-well plate and cultured overnight. Then, pre-determined concentrations of MoS2-PVP nanosheets were added and incubated for another 6 h. After that, the cells were irradiated with the NIR laser (0.6 W/cm2) for 1 min or 5 min and incubated for 24 h. A CCK-8 kit, Leica DM IL LED inverted-phase contrast microscope and trypan blue staining were used to evaluate the in vitro PTT effect quantitatively and qualitatively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Evaluating Toxicity and Apoptosis of 131I-Au PENPs-CTX

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To investigate the potential toxicity of the 131I-Au PENPs-CTX in vivo, one mouse from each group treated with 131I-Au PENPs-CTX, 131I-Au PENPs, Au PENPs-CTX, Au PENPs, or saline was euthanized to extract the tumor and major organs (heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidneys) after 21 days of treatment. The excised tumors and organs were fixed, embedded, sectioned, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and then observed using an AMEX 1200 inverted phase contrast microscope (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.). Furthermore, tumor apoptosis was analyzed using a terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) method and an apoptotic detection kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). The TUNEL kit was used for fixation, dehydration, paraffin-embedding, sectioning, and staining; then the tumor sections were observed with a Leica DM IL LED inverted phase contrast microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Separation and Characterization of Crosslinked Fiber Blocks

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crosslinked fiber mats were homogenized (24,000 ​rpm, 40 ​min) and then separated by gradient centrifugation (5000, 3000, and 1500 ​rpm, 80 ​s each time). After each centrifugation step, the supernatant was collected, and a drop of the suspension was placed on a glass slide to observe the size and morphology of the fiber blocks using a Leica DM IL LED inverted phase contrast microscope (Wetzlar, Germany). Based on gradient centrifugation, the optimized centrifuge condition (1500 ​rpm, 80 ​s) was adopted to obtain the desired dimensions of the fiber blocks. To determine the amount of I in the fiber blocks, the crosslinked fiber blocks were digested with aqua regia for 4 ​h, diluted 25 times with water, and sonicated for 20 ​min, followed by quantification using Leeman Prodigy inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES, Hudson, NH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Photodynamic Therapy for Cancer Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this work, 0.2 mol/L of H2O2 was added in DMEM, and the pH of solutions was adjusted to 6.4 with HCl. After that, 8,000 cells/well of HT29 cells were cultured with 0.1mL DMEM in 96-well-plate for 12 h. Then, FMPBs in fresh DMEM (0, 0.25, 0.5, and 1 mg/mL) were added in 96-well-plates (n = 3). The solution was then irradiated with 808-nm laser (1 W/cm2) for 5 min. Finally, the treated cells were incubated for 24 h. CCK-8 kit and dead/live kit were used to study the cell viability according to the instructions. Leica DM IL LED inverted phase-contrast microscope was used to capture the stained cells (live cells showed green fluorescence and dead cells with red).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Manganese-Doped Gold Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An MTT assay was applied to measure the in vitro cytotoxicity of the {(Au0)100G5.NH2-FI-DOTA(Mn)-HA} NPs in a routine culture environment with 10% FBS (heat-inactivated, 1% penicillin-streptomycin) and 5% CO2 at 37 °C.
HCCLM3 cells suspended in medium were seeded in a 96-well plate at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well with 200 μL per well and were incubated overnight. NPs with an Mn concentration ranging from 0–100 μg/mL were added into each well, and the cells were incubated for an additional 24 h. The mixture was then carefully removed, and the cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Then, 20 μL of MTT solution (5 mg/mL in PBS) was added into each well, and the cells were cultured for another 4 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. To dissolve the insoluble formazan crystals, the medium was carefully discarded and replaced with 200 μL of DMSO. Finally, the absorbance of each sample was measured at 570 nm using a Thermo Fisher Scientific Multiskan MK3 ELISA reader (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hudson, NH).
The morphology of the HCCLM3 cells was observed to evaluate the cytotoxicity of the {(Au0)100G5.NH2-FI-DOTA(Mn)-HA} NPs after the cells were treated with the NPs at Mn concentrations of 0, 10, 20, 50, 75, and 100 μg/mL for 24 h. A Leica DM IL LED inverted phase-contrast microscope was employed to observe the cell morphology of each sample at a magnification of 200×.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of FAM3C and LIFR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TMA sample identification is listed in Table S2. 5 μm FFPE sections were routinely deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated in alcohol, and processed as follows: The sections were incubated with target retrieval solution (Dako S1699) in a steamer (Oster CKSTSTMD5-W) for 10 minutes and then 3% hydrogen peroxide solution for 10 minutes and protein block (Dako X0909) for 20 minutes at room temperature. FAM3C (Sigma HPA050548) 1:1,600 and LIFR 1:500 (Santa Cruz sc-515337) antibodies were incubated in a humid chamber at 4oC overnight followed by biotinylated secondary antibody for 30 minutes and ABC reagent (Vector PK-6101) for 30 minutes. Immunocomplexes of horseradish peroxidase was visualized by DAB (Dako K3468), and sections were counterstained with hematoxylin before mounting. Samples were imaged using a using Leica DM IL LED Inverted Phase Contrast microscope and scored blindly 0–3 for staining intensity by three independent researchers and averaged for the final IHC score. Images representing scores 0–3 are shown in Fig. S4a. Student’s t-test statistical analysis was performed using Prism 7 (Graphpad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cytotoxicity of Fe3O4@HA Nanoparticles on HeLa Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HeLa cells were purchased from the Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology (the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China) and cultured in DMEM containing 5% FBS and 1% antibiotics at 37°C and 5% CO2.
HeLa cells (10,000 cells/well) were seeded in 96-well plates overnight. The Fe3O4@HA nanoparticles at various Fe concentrations (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mM) were next incubated with the HeLa cells for another 24 h in 200 μL of DMEM. HeLa cells treated with PBS were used as a control. The morphology of HeLa cells was further observed by phase contrast microscopy (Leica DM IL LED inverted phase contrast microscope) at a magnification of 200 times.
In vitro cytotoxicity was further quantitively confirmed by the MTT assay. Similar to the protocols described earlier, HeLa cells (10,000 cells/well) were seeded in 96-well plates overnight. The Fe3O4@HA nanoparticles at various Fe concentrations (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.4 mM) were then incubated with the HeLa cells for another 24 h in 200 μL DMEM. Furthermore, the cells were rinsed three times with PBS and then incubated in 100 μL of FBS-free DMEM medium containing 10% MTT for 4 h. After removal of the medium, the MTT assay was performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For each concentration, three parallel wells were measured to give the average values and standard deviations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Photothermal Responsive Nanofibrous Mats for Cancer Cell Therapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HT29 cells (5×104 cells/well) were seeded into a cell culture plate (24-well) and incubated in the cell incubator overnight. Then, 5 mg CP, CP/DOX, CP/MoS2, or CP/MoS2/DOX nanofibrous mat (sterilized with 75% alcohol for about 2 h and washed with PBS 3 times) was placed in the individual hole of a 24-well cell culture plate. After that, cells were irradiated with 808 nm for 5 min. The Dead/Live kit and CCK-8 were used to determine the metabolic activities of HT29 cells according to the instruction book. The absorbance collection was done using a microplate reader (MK3; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The Dead/Live stained cell images were collected using the Leica DM IL LED inverted phase contrast microscope. The phase contrast microscopic and fluorescent photograph of HT 29 cells treated with CP/MoS2/DOX nanofibers were recorded using an Olympus BX43 fluorescence microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Biodistribution and Biocompatibility of MoS2 Nanofibers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The biodistribution of Mo ions was analyzed by selecting KM mice as a model. In brief, KM mice with subcutaneous CP/MoS2 nanofibers (5 mg) embedded were euthanized after being fed for 7 days and 28 days. Major organs (heart, liver, spleen, lung, and kidney) were collected and digested using aqua regia to form a clear solution. The concentration of Mo ions in the above solution was quantified using an Agilent 700 Series ICP-OES. The in vivo histocompatibility of CP/MoS2 nanofibers was evaluated with standard H&E staining. To this end, KM mice were hypodermically embedded with 5 mg CP (control) and CP/MoS2 nanofibrous mat. Mice were euthanized after being fed for 7 days and 28 days to collect their major organs. The pictures of H&E staining were recorded using a Leica DM IL LED inverted phase contrast microscope. The body weight of KM mice was also weighed every 2 days during the feeding period.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

MTT Assay for Cell Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was utilized to test the cell viability after treating HeLa cells with the NOTA–FA–FI–PEG– PEI–Ac–Mn3O4 NPs and the NOTA–FI–PEG–PEI–Ac–Mn3O4 NPs. The assay was carried out according to the reported protocol.26 After the incubation of the NOTA–FA–FI–PEG–PEI–Ac–Mn3O4 NPs or the NOTA–FI–PEG–PEI–Ac–Mn3O4 NPs at various Mn concentrations (0, 5, 10, 25, 50, and 100 μg/mL) with HeLa cells for 24 h, the images of the cell morphology were obtained using a Leica DMIL LED inverted phase contrast microscope (200× magnification).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!