The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using cfx96 qrt pcr system

1

Analysis of Gene Expression via qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and reverse transcribed into cDNA using miScript reverse transcription kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The relative expression of target genes was detected on a Bio-Rad CFX96 qRT-PCR system with the SYBR Green method (β-actin served as an internal control). The sequences of the primers are listed in Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Hippocampal Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Hippocampal RNA was extracted using TRI reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) and reverse transcribed using the PrimeScript 1st strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan). cDNA was subjected to qPCR using the CFX96 qRT-PCR system (Bio-Rad, California, USA). The complete list of primer sequences is in supplementary Table 1. Hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase (Hprt) was used for normalization of qPCR data. Data analysis was performed using the ΔΔCt method as previously described (Bookout and Mangelsdorf 2003 (link)) and is represented as fold change ± SEM. The rationale for the chosen candidate genes can be found in supplementary Table 3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Validation of RNA-seq Data by qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to validate the RNA-seq data, qRT-PCR was performed to quantify the mRNA transcripts of 10 selected DEGs using the CFX96 qRT-PCR System (Bio-Rad, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The RNA samples were extracted using Bacterial Total RNA Extraction kit (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and treated with RNase-free DNase I to remove DNA contamination. Each qRT-PCR reaction was conducted in a final volume of 25 μL. The thermal cycling profile was as follows: 42 °C for 60 min and 72 °C for 10 min; 45 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, 60 °C for 30 s, 70 °C for 1 min and a final extension of 68 °C for 7 min. Negative control samples containing sterile water were also included. The cycle threshold values (CT) were determined and the relative fold differences were calculated by the 2−ΔΔCT method54 (link) using 16S rRNA as the reference gene. Three independent experiments were run in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Goat Gene Expression Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GEFs were synchronized for 2 h with 100 nM dexamethasone (DXM, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in serum-free DMEM/F-12 medium containing 1 × AA. Cell samples were harvested at the indicated time points (after DXM synchronization for 24, 28, 32, 36, 40, or 44 h). Total RNA was extracted and purified from GEFs and goat liver and kidney tissues using TRIzol reagent (TaKaRa, Dalian, China) and then treated with RNase-free DNase (TianGen, Beijing, China). cDNA was generated using a PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa). The primer sets used for the qPCR are listed in Table 1. The qPCR reactions were carried out in a 20 μL reaction solution comprising 10 ng cDNA with specific primers (200 nM) using the Thunderbird SYBR qPCR Mix (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) and a CFX96™ qRT-PCR system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), as described previously (34 (link), 35 (link)). All reactions were performed in triplicate. The relative expression levels of each sample were normalized to the average level of the constitutively expressed housekeeping gene, RPLP0 (also known as 36B4).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Differential Gene Expression in Quinoa

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
qRT-PCR was used to verify the expression levels of the candidate DEGs. The total RNA was extracted from the 12 samples (three biological replicates of N1, B1, N2, and B2) and reverse-transcribed into cDNA for qRT-PCR. The ddH2O was added in the qRT-PCR reaction mixture, including 2 μl cDNA, 2 µl BlazeTaq™ SYBR ® Green qPCR mix2.0 (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 2 μl qPCR Primer (2 μM), and 2 μl cDNA Template, to make up to 20 μl. The qRT-PCR analysis was performed by Bio-Rad CFX96 qRT-PCR system, and the reaction conditions were set as follows: 95°C for 15 min, PCR cycle step at 94°C for 20 s, annealing, and extension step at 60°C for 34 s. The specific primers were designed using Premier 5.0 software based on the Coding sequence (CDS) sequence of the target gene (Supplementary Table S3). The ACT7 in quinoa was used as the internal reference, and the calculation of relative expression of DEGs by the 2−ΔΔCt method (Livak and Schmittgen, 2001 (link)) and t-test was applied to analyze the significant differences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantitative RT-PCR of Target Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and reverse-transcribed into cDNA using miScript reverse transcription kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The relative expression of target genes was detected on a Bio-Rad CFX96 qRT-PCR system with the SYBR Green method (β-actin served as an internal control). Table S2 lists the sequences of the primers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis of Differentially Expressed Genes in Maize Kernel Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) technique was used to verify the expression level of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) related to the BETL development and starch synthesis process. The total RNA of the kernels from the WT and smk7a collected at 12 and 20 DAP was extracted using an RNA Easy Fast Extraction Kit (DP452, Tiangen, Beijing, China) and then transcribed into complementary deoxyribonucleic acid (cDNA) using qPCR RT Master Mix with gDNA Remover (KR116, TIANGEN, Beijing, China). The qRT-PCR reactions were carried out using Taq Pro Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Q712-02, Vazyme, Nanjing, China). The qRT-PCR analysis was performed using a Bio-Rad CFX96 qRT-PCR system. The reaction was carried out using three biological replicates with three technical replicates, with tubulin as the endogenous control (Zm00001d013367). The relative expression values were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt method [66 (link)], and the t-test was conducted to analyze the significant differences. The specific primers for the qRT-PCR are listed in Table S9.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!