The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using spurr s epoxy resin

1

Transmission Electron Microscopy of Leaf Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Leaf tissue was fixed in 2% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde plus 2% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde in 70 mM Pipes buffer, pH 6.8, for 1 h at room temperature, then washed and postfixed in 1% (vol/vol) osmium tetroxide in the same buffer. The tissue was dehydrated in an ethanol series and embedded in Spurr’s epoxy resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences). Thin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and observed with a Philips EM-300 transmission electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Electron Microscopy of Decellularized Lungs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For electron microscopic analyses, segments of decellularized chicken and emu lungs were fixed overnight at 4°C in Karnovsky’s fixative (2.5% glutaraldehyde, 1.0% paraformaldehyde in 0.1M Cacodylate buffer, pH 7.2). After rinsing in Cacodylate buffer, the tissue was minced into 1 mm3 pieces and then fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 2 hours at 4°C. Subsequently, the pieces were rinsed again in Cacodylate buffer, dehydrated through graded ethanols, then cleared in propylene oxide, and embedded in Spurr’s epoxy resin (all reagents from Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). Semi-thin sections (1 μm) were cut with glass knives on a Reichert ultracut microtome (Reichert-Jung, Vienna, Austria), stained with methylene blue–azure II (Electron Microscopy Sciences) and then evaluated for areas of interest (proximal and distal alveolar septae, large/small airways, blood vessels). Ultrathin sections (60–80 nm) were cut with a diamond knife, retrieved onto 200 mesh thin bar nickel grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences), contrasted with uranyl acetate (2% in 50% ethanol, Electron Microscopy Sciences) and lead citrate (Electron Microscopy Sciences), and examined with a JEOL 1400 TEM (JEOL USA, Inc, Peabody, MA, USA) operating at 60kV [5 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Yeast Cell Ultrastructural Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Yeast cells were prepared for transmission electron microscopy using a modification of methods published previously (Wright, 2000). Specifically, cells were fixed with 2% glutaraldehyde in 0.1M PIPES buffer, pH 6.8, containing 1mM MgCl2, 1mM CaCl2, and 0.1M sorbitol for overnight at 4°C. Following cell wall permeabilization with 1% sodium metaperiodate, the cell pellets were post-fixed for 1 hour with 1% osmium tetroxide/1.25% potassium ferrocyanide/0.1M PIPES buffer, pH 6.8, and stained en bloc in 2% aqueous uranyl acetate for 20 minutes. The pellets were dehydrated using an increasing ethanol series followed by propylene oxide and embedment in Spurr’s epoxy resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA). Ultrathin sections (70nm) were cut and mounted on 200mesh copper grids and stained with Reynolds’ lead citrate (Reynolds, 1963). The sections were observed at 80kV using a LEO EM910 transmission electron microscope (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, LLC, Thornwood, NY), and digital images were taken using a Gatan Orius SC1000 digital camera with Digital Micrograph 3.11.0 software (Gatan, Inc., Pleasanton, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Ultrastructural Analysis of Mesenchymal Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mesenchymal stromal cells in culture were fixed in 4% formaldehyde and 4% glutaraldehyde (catalog # 16000; Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA) in PBS overnight, post-fixed in 2% osmium tetroxide (catalog # 19150; Electron Microscopy Sciences) in PBS, dehydrated in a graduated series of ethanol solutions, and embedded in Spurr's epoxy resin (catalog # 14300; Electron Microscopy Sciences). Blocks were processed as described previously 6 . The sections of embedded specimens were analysed with a Philips CM100 electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ultrastructural Analysis of Aortic Collagen Remodeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were prepared at the Electron Microscopy Core Facility, the Ohio
State University and University of Missouri following a modified version of
National Center for Microscopy and Imaging Research (NCMIR) methods for 3D EM
[30 (link)]. Briefly, segments of suprarenal
abdominal aorta from the experimental mice (n=4) were
dissected, fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde for at least 24 h, and processed for
routine transmission electron microscopy (TEM) as previously
described1. Aortic pieces were osmium tetroxide post-fixed,
dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, and embedded in Spurr’s epoxy
resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences). Thin sections were cut and imaged using a
JOEL JEM-1400 TEM equipped with an Olympus Veleta digital camera. To determine
the percent abnormal collagen, ImageJ (NIH) was used to trace total collagen
area and total abnormal collagen area from TEM images of remodeled adventitia.
This fraction determined for each image (n=6 per sample) was
used to determine percent abnormal collagen in each sample. Fibril diameter
measurements were determined using ImageJ (NIH) using longitudinal sections of
collagen fibrils at magnifications ranging from 25 to 50 kx. At least
n=100 fibrils were analyzed for each group by using
multiple images and TEM sections as described previously [31 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Ultrastructural Analysis of Wound Collagen

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For ultrastructural collagen analysis, normal skin and wound tissues were fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde. After rinsing with 0.1 mol/L sodium cacodylate buffer, samples were post-fixed in 1% osmium tetraxide, dehydrated in graded alcohols, and embedded in Spurr's epoxy resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Fort Washington, PA). Ultrathin sections (80 nm) were collected on grids, stained with uracyl acetate and lead citrate and examined using a Hitachi H-600 (75 kV) TEM as previously described [26] (link). The wound bed was identified using a serial section stained with toluidine blue. TEM images of collagen fibril cross-sections were taken at random within the boundaries of the wound bed at a magnification of 30,000× and the photographic negatives were scanned into Adobe Photoshop. The diameter of the collagen fibrils was measured using Scion Image. Five normal skin samples and five wound samples from each time point, all from different mice, were used for analysis. Each electron micrograph was divided into four parts for analysis, and fibrils from four micrographs per sample were measured. A total of 1100–2100 fibrils per animal were analyzed [26] (link). Images of fibroblasts within the wound bed were captured at 8000× and the photographs were scanned into Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, CA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Ultrastructural Analysis of Aortic Remodeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For TEM analysis, segments of suprarenal abdominal aorta or thoracic aorta from mice (n=6 AngII; 6 saline-infused) and clinical AAA or control human tissue (n=6 AAA; 6 control) were dissected, fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde for at least 24 hours, and processed for routine TEM as previously described[35 (link)]. Briefly, aortic pieces were osmium tetroxide post-fixed, dehydrated in a graded series of ethanol, and embedded in Spurr’s epoxy resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences). Thin sections (~ 94 nm in thickness)) were cut and imaged using a JOEL JEM-1400 TEM equipped with a SIS Olympus MegaView III digital camera (with pixel size of its charged coupled device (CCD) detector as 6.45 × 6.45 μm). Images were acquired at 1376 × 1032 pixels with magnifications ranging from 3k to 150k. Multiple regions spanning the intima to the adventitia were imaged in murine aortic sections to assess ECM remodeling, collagen morphology and location of abnormal collagen. For analysis of abnormal collagen, images were acquired from at least five different areas in the remodeled regions in both murine and human samples. TEM imaging and identification of abnormal collagen (with weakened D-periodicty) was performed by three independent users.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Autophagosome and Mitochondrial Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown in six‐well plates, three control wells were treated with oleic acid for 24 h and three treatment wells were treated with oleic acid for 24 h plus 0.5 mM caffeine for 6 h. Cells were harvested and fixed in a modified Karnovsky's fixative (2.5% glutaraldehyde and 2.0% paraformaldehyde in 0.1 M Sorenson's phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) overnight at room temperature. Cells were rinsed in Sorenson's phosphate buffer, followed by secondary fixation in 1.0% osmium tetroxide with 0.8% potassium ferricyanide in 0.2 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.4. Samples were rinsed and dehydrated with an ethanol series, and embedded in Spurr's epoxy resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences). Embedded samples were trimmed, and 90 nm sections were cut on a Leica UC7 ultramicrotome (Leica Microsystems, Inc.). Sections were collected on Formvar‐coated (0.25 g Formvar in 100 ml ethylene dichloride), 200 mesh copper grids. Sections were stained with 2% uranyl acetate in 50% ethyl alcohol for 15 min, rinsed with DI, and stained with Reynolds lead citrate for 15 min. Sections were imaged on a Tecnai 12 Spirit TEM (FEI). A total of 30 images were collected for each treatment group and images were analyzed in Fiji (Schindelin et al., 2012). Point counting stereological analysis was used to determine volume density of autophagosomes and mitochondrial.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Ultrastructural Analysis of DAG Seedling Roots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immediately after harvesting, roots of ten DAG seedlings were fixed overnight in ice-cold 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, pH 7.2, containing 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde. They were then washed in the same buffer, post-fixed in 1% OsO4 for 2 h at room temperature (RT) and washed again in cacodylate buffer, pH 7.2. After dehydration in a graded ethanol series samples were embedded in Spurr’s epoxy resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA). Ultrathin sections (70 nm thick) were cut on an RMC ultramicrotome (RMC, Tucson, AZ, USA) and mounted on 150 mesh formvar-coated copper grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences). Just before analysis, the sections were stained with uranyl acetate for 30 min at room temperature, washed with ultrapure water and stained 10 min with lead citrate and washed again with ultrapure water. Images were taken with a JEOL100 CXII instrument (JEOL USA Inc., Peabody, MA) equipped with Gatan SC1000 (Model 832) CCD camera (Gatan Inc., Pleasanton, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Ultrastructural Analysis of Microalgae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were fixed with 2.5% (v/v) glutaraldehyde in sterile-filtered TAP N2 medium overnight at 4°C. Next, the samples were washed with TAP N2 medium and postfixed with 2% OsO 4 for 2 h at room temperature. Following three washes with 0.1 M (w/v) cacodylate buffer (with intermittent centrifugation at 2000g for 3 min), the samples were dehydrated in a 30, 50, 70, 95, and 100% graded acetone series for 1 h each at room temperature and left at 4°C in 100% acetone overnight. The samples were then embedded in Spurr's epoxy resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences). Ultrathin sections (70 nm in thickness) were obtained with an RMC Boeckeler ultramicrotome and mounted on 150 mesh formvar-coated copper grids. Finally, sections were stained with 5% (v/v) uranyl acetate for 30 min at room temperature, washed with ultrapure water, and stained for 10 min with 1% (v/v) lead citrate. The samples were analyzed with a JEOL 100 CXII transmission electron microscope (Japan Electron Optics Laboratories) at the Centre of Advanced Microscopy at Michigan State University.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!