The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using j 113397

1

Molecular Characterization of Nogo Receptor

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
WT human NgR1 (61 (link)) was subcloned into p3xFLAG-CMV9 vector and used for generating mutant constructs by PCR methods using KOD Hot start DNA polymerase (Toyobo) and sequenced. Hemagglutinin (HA)–neuropilin (62 (link)), Myc-NgR1 (25 (link)), and Myc-NgR2 (63 (link)) have been previously described. HA-tagged human ORL1 construct was obtained from UMR cDNA Resource Center. Anti-ORL1 rabbit serum was a gift from J. Hamid, University of Calgary (64 (link)). Anti-FLAG (#F7425 or #F3165), anti-HA (#H9658 or #H6908), anti-Myc (#M4439 or #C3956), anti-GFAP (#G3893), and anti–β-actin (#A1978) antibodies (all from Sigma-Aldrich), anti-NgR1 (#AF1440) and anti-NgR2 (#AF2776) antibodies (R&D Systems), anti-ORL1 antibody (#RA14140, Neuromics), anti–ßIII-tubulin antibody (#G7121, Promega), anti–5-hydroxytryptamine (5HT) antibody (#20080, ImmunoStar), and anti-GM130 antibody (#610823, BD Transduction Laboratories) were used for the following experiments. PI-PLC was from Sigma- Aldrich, CHX was from Wako, benzyl-GalNAc and nociceptin were from Calbiochem, and (±)-J113397 was purchased from Tocris Bioscience. Nogo22 protein has been described previously (27 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Synthesis and In Vivo Evaluation of BU08070

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BU08070 was synthesized at the Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom as described previously (Cami-Kobeci et al., 2011 (link)). J-113397 and β-funaltrexamine (β-FNA) were purchased from Tocris Bioscience (Ellisville, MO, USA). Tumour necrosis factor- α (TNF-α) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals (St. Louis, MO, USA). Zeocin was obtained from Invivogen (San Diego, CA, USA). Cell culture media and supplements were from Sigma-Aldrich Chemicals (St. Louis, MO, USA) or Invitrogen (Paisley, UK). All other reagents, unless otherwise stated, were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Poznan, Poland).
For animal studies, BU08070 was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), further diluted with 0.9% NaCl solution to the final concentration of 5% DMSO. Animals without treatment received vehicle alone. BU08070 was injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) at the dose of 1 mg/kg in the final volume 100 μl. The dose of BU08070 used in all experiments was selected based on preliminary studies. β-FNA and J-113397 were injected i.p. (at the dose of 1 mg/kg and 12 mg/kg, respectively) 15 min before BU08070.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Ligand-Receptor Interactions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All cell culture media and supplements were from Invitrogen (Paisley, U.K.). All other reagents used were from Sigma Chemical Co. (Poole, UK) or E. Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) and were of the highest purity available. Dermorphin, N/OFQ, [Dmt1]N/OFQ(1-13)-NH2 and PWT2-[Dmt1] were synthesized in house (Department of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Ferrara) as previously described (Guerrini et al., 1997 (link); Guerrini et al., 2014 (link)), while J-113397, DPDPE, and dynorphin A were bought from Tocris Bioscience (Bristol, UK). Naltrexone HCl was from National Institute on Drug Abuse (Bethesda, MD, USA). Tritiated UFP-101 ([3H]-UFP-101) was synthesized as described previously (Ibba et al., 2008 (link)). Tritiated diprenorphine ([3H]-DPN) was purchased from Perkin Elmer. Native coelenterazine (CLZN, 5 mM, EtOH) was from Synchem UG & Co. KG (Altenburg, Germany). Stock solutions (1 mM) of peptides and the new compound PWT2-[Dmt1] were made in ultrapure water and all stored at − 20°C until use. The successive dilutions were made in HBSS/HEPES (20 mM) buffer (containing 0.005 % Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) fraction V to avoid licking) in the calcium assay and PBS/BSA (0.01 %) buffer in the BRET assay.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Pharmacological Evaluation of Drugs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Δ9-THC and d-amphetamine were provided by the NIDA Drug Supply Program (Rockville, MD); morphine, buprenorphine, and naltrexone were purchased from Sigma Pharmaceuticals (St. Louis, MO); SCH 221510 and J-113397 were purchased from Tocris (Ellisville, MO). Morphine, buprenorphine, d-amphetamine, and naltrexone were prepared in saline, whereas Δ9-THC, SCH 221510, and J-113397 were initially prepared in a 20:20:60 mixture of 95% ethanol, Emulphor (Alkamuls EL-620; Rhone-Poulenc, Cranbury, NJ), and saline, and further diluted with saline. All drug solutions were refrigerated and protected from light. During test sessions, saline or doses of drug were administered in volumes of 0.3 ml/kg body weight or less by intramuscular (i.m.) injection into calf or thigh muscle.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Intracerebral Drug Administration in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Remifentanil (Hospira, Lake Forest, IL) and naltrexone (National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD) were dissolved in sterile water. SCH221510 and J-113397 (Tocris Bioscience, Minneapolis, MN) were dissolved in a 1:1:8 ratio of dimethyl sulfoxide, Tween 80 and sterile water. For drug self-administration, remifentanil and SCH221510 were intravenously delivered in the volume of 0.1 ml/kg. SCH221510 and J-113397 were administered centrally by intracisternal injection. Briefly, the rat was lightly anesthetized with isoflurane and placed in a stereotaxic device. The head of the rat was held perpendicular to the body axis and the drug was administered through a 26G, ½ g needle inserted in the cisterna magna to a depth of 5mm. The position of the needle was confirmed by a flow of clean cerebrospinal fluid. A solution of 100 μl was infused over 20 s and the needle was held in place for an additional 10 s before being withdrawn (Lee et al., 2003 (link); Shannon and Lutz, 2002 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!