The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

75 protocols using sodium persulfate

1

Antioxidant Capacity Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phosphate buffer, trichloroacetic acid, ferric chloride, hydrochloric acid, ascorbic acid, 2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine (TPTZ), Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, gallic acid, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), potassium hexacyanoferrate(III), 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox), 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), and dimethylsulfoxide were from Sigma-Aldrich (Santiago, Chile); ferrous sulfate, sodium acetate, sodium carbonate, sodium persulfate, sodium sulfate anhydrous, and ethanol were from Merck (Santiago, Chile).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Phytochemical Analysis of Bioactive Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The reagents included in standard assay packages with colorimetric and kinetic methods were obtained from BioMaxima S.A., Lublin, Poland. Thiobarbituric acid, FC (Folin-Ciocalteu) reagent, DPPH, sodium persulfate, toluene, acetone, ethanol, methanol, formic acid, PEG, dichlormethane, diphenylborinic acid aminoethylester (NP) and ethyl acetate were obtained from several companies (Sigma, Fluka, Merck). Standard samples of rutin, kaempferol, and chlorogenic acid were purchased from Sigma, Germany. Ferulic acid, galic acid and quercetin were obtained from Roth, Germany. Neutral formalin solutions were purchased from Chemical Company S.A., Iasi, Romania. All other chemicals and solvents used in the study were of analytical grade.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Antioxidant Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ultra-pure water (<5 µg/L TOC) was obtained from the water purification systems Arium 126 61316-RO, plus an Arium 611 UV unit (Sartorius, Goettingen, Germany). Formic acid (MS grade) and methanol (HPLC grade) were purchased from J.T. Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ, USA). Folin–Ciocalteu (FC) reagent, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), ferric chloride hexahydrate, 2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine, quercetin, gallic acid, Amberlite® resin (XAD4), phosphate buffer, trichloroacetic acid, ferric chloride, hydrochloric acid, ascorbic acid, 2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) (ABTS), 2,4,6-tris(2-pyridyl)-s-triazine (TPTZ), gallic acid, potassium hexacyanoferrate(III), 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchroman-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox), and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich; sodium carbonate, ferrous sulfate, sodium persulfate, sodium acetate, sodium sulfate anhydrous, and ethanol were obtained from Merck (Lima, Peru). HPLC standards (with purity higher than 95% by HPLC) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich Chem. Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA) or Extrasynthèse (Genay, France).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

PCP Sodium Salt Oxidation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sodium salt PCP, which is the sodium salt of PCP (C6Cl5ONa) with 98% purity was used without further purification. The characteristics of the PCP included of boiling point: 309-310C0, mass molar: 288.32 g mol−1. PCP solution was prepared by dissolving PCP in NaOH solution to accelerate its dissolution [6 (link),18 (link)]. Hydrogen peroxide (30% w/w) and the sodium persulfate from Merck, 98% mass molar: 238.1 g mol−1 were used as oxidants.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Catalytic Organic Pollutant Degradation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LP, CAF, and CBZ were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Table S1 (Supplementary Material) shows the chemical structures and physicochemical properties of each CEC. Hydrogen peroxide and sodium persulfate were purchased from MERCK. Sodium metavanadate and ascorbic acid were purchased from Synth. Bovine serum catalase, methanol, and formic acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (≥ 98% purity).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Bisphenol A and Persulfate Oxidation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bisphenol A (BPA, C15H16O2, CAS number: 80-05-7) and sodium persulfate (SPS, Na2S2O8, 99+%, CAS number: 7775-27-1) were purchased from Merck.
Humic acid (technical grade), hydrogen peroxide (30%), sodium chloride (99.8%), sodium hydroxide (98%), boric acid (>99.8%) and sulphuric acid (95%) were also obtained from Merck. Methanol (99.9%) and t-butanol (99%) were purchased from Fluka, while potassium dihydrogen phosphate from Millipore.
All chemicals were used as received, without further purification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Synthesis of Ce-Doped TiO2 Catalyst

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following specific commercial reagents were used in this study: phenol (Aldrich), sodium persulfate (Merck), and hydrogen peroxide (35 % v/v, Biopack) .
A synthesized Ce-doped TiO 2 catalyst (E GAP = 2.80 eV, S BET = 27.68 m 2 g -1 ) was used. The catalyst was prepared by the sol-gel method, modifying the procedure reported by Choi et al. (2010) , with Ce(NO 3 ) 3 6H 2 O (Aldrich) as metal-ion precursor. The obtained xerogel was calcined at 600 °C in a programmable furnace to remove organic chemicals and to crystallize initial amorphous TiO 2 to anatase and rutile-phase TiO 2 . The calcination was precisely controlled at a ramp rate of 6 °C min -1 and target temperature of 600 °C for 1 h, under air, followed by natural cooling down. The Ce-doped TiO 2 was prepared to give a doping level of 0.1 nominal atomic percent (at.%). The prepared material will be referred to hereafter as 0.1Ce (referring to 0.1 Ce nominal atomic percent). A more detailed description of the catalyst synthesis and its characterizations has been previously reported (Martin et al. 2015) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Synthesis of Conductive Polymer Composite

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sodium p-styrenesulfonate hydrate, 4-hydroxybutyl acrylate (HBA), 2-carboxyethyl acrylate (CEA), sodium persulfate, and iron(iii) sulfate hydrate were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. 3,4-Ethylenedioxythiophene (EDOT; TCI) and DI water (Fisher Scientific Korea Ltd.) were used without further purification. The PVDF film with a thickness of 80 μm was purchased from Fils Co. Ltd.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Magnetite-Based Hydrogel Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Magnetite particles 48806 (98.7%, ρ = 5.17 g cm−3) were purchased by Kremer Pigmente, Aichstetten, Germany and sieved before usage. For deionized water, an ultrapure water filter PRO VE 3+ by AFT, Zirndorf, Germany was used. Tetramethylethylenediamine (99%) and sodium persulfate (≥98.0%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany and N-isopropylacrylamide (stabilized by Mequinol, ≥98.0%) was purchased from Tokyo Chemical Industry, Eschborn, Germany. Laponite RD and Laponite RDS were obtained by BYK, Wesel, Germany. All chemicals were used without further purification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Graphene Transfer onto SiO2/Si Substrate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
First, the PMMA solution (PMMA, 950 K A4, MicroChem Corp) was spin-coated onto one side of the graphene/Cu sample with a spin-coating rate of 1000 rpm for 60 s and dried for 3 mins on a hot plate at the temperature of 80 °C. Oxygen plasma was used to etch the graphene on the back side of sample. Subsequently, sodium persulfate (1 mol/L, Sigma-Aldrich) solution was used to etch Cu foil, and the PMMA/graphene film was floated on the surface of the solution. The PMMA/graphene film was washed with distilled water several times to remove the etchant residue. After the rinsing of the PMMA/graphene film with distilled water, the PMMA/graphene film was scooped out by a SiO2/Si substrate at room temperature and then was dried overnight to reduce the water trapped between graphene and substrates. Finally, the PMMA was removed by soaking the sample in the acetone bath and dried with compressed nitrogen gas.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!