The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Luna c18 2

Manufactured by Phenomenex
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Japan, Germany

Luna C18(2) is a reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) column designed for the separation and analysis of a wide range of organic compounds. The column features a spherical silica gel stationary phase with chemically bonded C18 (octadecyl) functional groups, providing a hydrophobic surface for the separation of both polar and non-polar analytes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

109 protocols using luna c18 2

1

NMR Spectroscopy and HPLC Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 25 °C using a 600 MHz Fourier transform nuclear magnetic resonance device (VNS600; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) at the Core Research Support Center for Natural Products and Medical Materials (CRCNM) in the Yeungnam University. Medium pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC) was also conducted using Biotage Isolera (Biotage, Uppsala, Sweden). In addition, high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) was conducted on a Waters system (Waters 1525 pump and Waters 996 PDA; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) with a semi-preparative HPLC column (Phenomenex Luna C18(2), 10 mm × 250 mm, 5 μ (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) and an analytical HPLC column (Phenomenex Luna C18(2), 4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μ (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolation and Purification of Bioactive Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A portion of the extract (5.5 g) was dissolved in MeOH and filtered to get a MeOH soluble fraction. The MeOH soluble fraction was dried and fractionated on an Oasis cartridge eluting in a stepwise manner with 100% H2O, MeOH–H2O (1 : 3), MeOH–H2O (3 : 1), and MeOH–CH2Cl2 (9 : 1). The 75% MeOH eluted fraction and the MeOH–CH2Cl2 (9 : 1) eluted fraction were combined and separated by reversed-phased C18 HPLC (Phenomenex Luna C18(2) 5 μ, 100 Å, 250 × 21.2 mm) using a linear gradient of MeCN–H2O (50 : 50 to 100 : 0) over 50 min to afford compounds 1 (4.3 mg), 2 (0.8 mg), 4 (2.9 mg), and fraction A. Fraction A was further purified by HPLC (Phenomenex Luna C18(2) 5 μ, 100 Å, 250 × 21.2 mm) with MeCN–H2O (30 : 70 to 80 : 20) over 50 min to obtain compound 3 (0.7 mg).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Spectroscopic Analysis of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optical rotations were acquired using a Kruss Optronic P-8000 polarimeter with a 5-cm cell. The ultraviolet (UV) spectra were measured with a V-730 UV-visible spectrophotometer (Jasco, USA) using a path length of 1 cm. The infrared spectra were recorded on a Varian Scimitar Series in CHCl3. The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were acquired at 300 MHz for 1H in CD3OD and DMSO-d6 using a solvent signal as an internal reference (δH 3.31 and δH 2.50 for the respective solvents). Mass data were obtained on an Agilent Technologies 6120 quadrupole. Electrospray ionization mass spectroscopy (ESIMS) data were collected using an Agilent Technologies 6120 quadrupole mass spectrometer (Santa Clara, CA) coupled with an Agilent Technologies 1260 series HPLC with a reversed-phase column (Phenomenex Luna C-18(2) (100 Å, 50 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min. The fractions were purified by a Waters 616 quaternary HPLC pump and a Waters 996 photodiode array detector using a Phenomenex Luna C-18(2) (250 mm × 10 mm, 5 μm) reversed HPLC column. HRMS analysis was conducted with a JEOL JMS-AX505WA mass spectrometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Isolation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The analysis was conducted using an LC 1260 Infinity system equipped with a 1260 FC-AS G1364C fraction collector. The system was operated under the control of Open Lab CDS 2.7 software (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The separation was optimized on a Luna C18(2) (150 × 4.6 mm ID, 5 µm particle, batch No.: 5291-0217) column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) guarded by a pre-column. Isolation was performed using a Luna C18(2) (150 × 10 mm ID, 5 µm particle, batch No.: 5291-0227) column (Phenomenex, Torrance, CA, USA) that was fitted with a pre-column. Parameters were scaled up according to the increase in the column diameter. The collection of fractions was carried out on the basis of fixed time windows considering the latency and threshold recorded at 280 and 340 nm. For the optimized separation of HP5, a two-step gradient was used: 0–5 min at 10% B, followed by 45 min at 20% B extended for equilibration. A flow rate of 0.6 mL/min was used. For the HP8 fraction, an isocratic of 45% B was used. In both cases, the mobile phase was ultra-pure water (A) and acetonitrile (B) with 0.1% formic acid. The thermostat temperature was set at 25 °C. Parameters were scaled up according to the increase in the column diameter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantification of Rutin in APAE by HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the standardization, the estimation of rutin was carried out in APAE by HPLC at Natural Remedies Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India. The HPLC system (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) having Phenomenex-Luna C-18 (2) of size 250 × 4.60 mm and 5 μm internal diameter and photo diode array detector was used. Standard rutin (Natural Remedies Pvt. Ltd, percent purity ≥95%) (0.1 mg/mL) and APAE (50.0 mg/mL) was prepared in HPLC grade methanol and eluted in mobile phase consisting of potassium dihydrogen orthophosphate (KH2PO4) (A) and acetonitrile (B). The moblie phase gradient (A:B) were 95:5 (0.01 min) to 55:45 (18 min), 20:80 (25 min) to (28 min), 55:45 (35 min) and 95:5 (40 min) to (45 min). The wave length, flow rate, and injection volume were 280 nm, 1.5 mL/min and 20 μL, respectively. The chromatograms were recorded. The amount of rutin was calculated by the following formula:
Amount of rutin = [Area of sample/Area of standard] × [Weight of standard (mg)/Standard dilution (mL)] × [Sample dilution (mL)/Weight of the sample (mg)] × Purity of the standard (%)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Analytical Characterization of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals were purchased from Fisher Scientific and Sigma-Aldrich and used as such unless stated otherwise. PCR was performed with the PrimeSTAR HS kit with GC Buffer (Takara Bio USA, Inc.). All solvents used were HPLC grade solvents or higher. Analytical HPLC analyses were conducted with an Agilent 1200 HPLC system with diode array detection connected to a Phenomenex Luna C18 reversed-phase HPLC column (5 μm, 250 mm × 4.6 mm). High resolution LC-MS analyses were performed with Agilent 6530 Accurate-Mass Q-TOF MS coupled to an Agilent 1260 LC system. Preparative HPLC was carried out by using an Agilent 218 purification system equipped with a Pro-Star 410 automatic injector, an Agilent ProStar UV-Vis dual wavelength detector, and a 440-LC fraction collector connected to Phenomenex Luna C18(2), 10.0×250 mm, 5 mm column. NMR data were acquired at the UCSD Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences NMR Facility on a 600 MHz Varian NMR spectrometer (Topspin 2.1.6 software, Bruker) with a 1.7 mm cryoprobe.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

HPLC Analysis of Phenolic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The method was adapted from Kaltsa et al. [29 (link)]. In brief, a Shimadzu liquid Chromatograph (CBM-20A) and a Shimadzu detector (SPD-M20A) were used. A Phenomenex Luna C18(2) (100 Å, 5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm) (Phenomenex, Inc., Torrance, CA, USA) retained at 40 °C, a flow rate was 1 mL min−1, and an injection volume 20 μL were used. The mobile phases and the elution program used have been described previously [29 (link)]. Quantification calibration curves were prepared using three points (0, 10, and 50 mg mL−1), for caffeic acid (quantified at 320 nm, y = 0.000009x + 0.8755, R2 = 0.9986), rosmarinic acid (at 320 nm, y = 0.00002x + 0.3334, R2 = 0.9998), and luteolin-7-O-glucoside (at 345 nm, y = 0.00002x + 1.0794, R2 = 0.9980). The estimation of the total area was carried out at 245 nm and 350 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Analytical Characterization of Chemical Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All chemicals were acquired from Fisher Scientific and Sigma–Aldrich and used without further purification. PCR was performed with Takara PrimeStarMax DNA polymerase. Gibson assembly cloning kits were from New England Biolabs. All solvents were of HPLC grade or higher. Analytical HPLC analyses were conducted with an Agilent 1200 HPLC system with diode array detection connected to a Phenomenex Luna C18(2), 250 × 21.5 mm × 10 mm column. LC-MS analyses were conducted with an Agilent 6530 Accurate-Mass Q-TOF MS (MassHunter software, Agilent) equipped with a Dual electrospray ionization source and an Agilent 1260 LC system (ChemStation software, Agilent) with diode array detector. Preparative HPLC was carried out using an Agilent 218 purification system (ChemStation software, Agilent) equipped with a ProStar 410 automatic injector, an Agilent ProStar UV-Vis Dual Wavelength Detector, and a 440-LC fraction collector connected to Phenomenex Luna C18(2), 10.0 × 250 mm, 5 µm column. NMR data were acquired at the UCSD Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences NMR Facility on a 600 MHz Varian NMR spectrometer (Topspin 2.1.6 software, Bruker) with a 1.7 mm cryoprobe.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of ATS-TMP Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Arbutin, Tetraethylammonium bromide (TBAB), 1-(3-Dimethylaminopropyl)-3-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDCI), 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP), 11-bromoundecanoic acid and cholesterol were purchased from Adamas Reagent (China) Company (Shanghai, China). Anhydrous potassium carbonate, Dichloromethane, Methanol, Petroleum ether, Ethyl acetate and dimethylformamide were bought from Shanghai Titan Chemical Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). Ligustrazine Hydrochloride (TMP) was purchased from Hubei Xing Yinhe Chemical Co., Ltd. Artesunate (ATS) was purchased from Kunming Pharmaceutical Group Chongqing Wulingshan Pharmaceutical Group (Chongqing, China). Soy lecithin was purchased from Shanghai Taiwei Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). DSPE-mPEG2000 was purchased from A.V.T. (Shanghai) Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). ATS injection was got from Guilin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd (Guilin, China). TMP Injection was obtained from Beijing Yongkang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). HPLC column (Phenomenex Luna C18(2), 4.6 × 100 mm, 3 μm) was purchased from Phenomenex (California, USA). Acetonitrile HPLC grade was purchased from Tianjin Concord Technology Co., LTD (Tianjin, China). Centrifugal ultrafiltration tubes were purchased from Merk Millipore Ltd (Darmstadt, Germany). LC–MS (Exion LC-20AC, SCIEX Triple Quad 6500 + mass spectrometer, AB SCIEX, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

HPLC Analysis of Flavonoid Aglycones

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC analyses of total flavonoid aglycones (TFA) were performed with a gas chromatograph Agilent Technologies brand Model 1100 (Massy, France). It is equipped with a quaternary pump, an autoinjector, a degasser, a column thermostat, an autosampler, and a diode-array detector (DAD) UV-VIS. The computer control system and data evaluation and processing were managed by a Chem Station software computer coupled to RP-HPLC column Phenomenex Luna C18 (2) of size 250 mm x 4.6 mm and a porosity of 5 µm.
The column temperature was maintained at 28°C. The flow rate of the mobile phase was 0.5 ml/min and the maximum wavelength was set at λ = 370 nm. The injection volume was 20μl.The elution of the compounds was carried out in gradient mode. The binary mobile phase (table 1) consists of purified water-methanol 70% V/V slightly acidified by 0.05% TFA (solution A) and pure methanol acidified with 0.05% TFA (solution B).
A myricetin (Myr) standard solution was prepared with a concentration range from 10 to 250 µg/ml from a stock solution of 2 mg/ml. All solutions were analyzed under the same conditions as the extracts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!