The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

32 protocols using fastrack

1

Multimodal MEG and Eye Tracking Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to the measurement, the head position of the participant was digitized using the Polhemus Fastrack electromagnetic digitiser system (Polhemus Inc., USA). The MEG data were acquired using a 306-sensor TRIUX Elekta Neuromag system (Elekta, Finland), while the participant was sitting in an upright position (60°) in a dim light magnetically shielded room. The magnetic signals were bandpass filtered within 0.1 – 330 Hz with embedded anti-aliasing filters and sampled at 1000 Hz. Simultaneously with the MEG, we also acquired the coordinates of the pupil and the pupil diameter using an EyeLink eye-tracker (SR Research, Canada).
The broadband flickering (or tagging) signals were recorded using a custom-made photodetector (Aalto NeuroImaging Centre, Aalto University, Finland) that was connected to a miscellaneous channel of the MEG system. This allowed us to acquire the tagging signal with the same temporal precision as the MEG data.
Additionally, a high-resolution T1-weighted anatomical image (TR/TE of 7.4/3.5 ms, a flip angle of 7°, FOV of 256×256×176 mm, 176 sagittal slices, and a voxel size of 1×1×1 mm3) was acquired using 3-Tesla Phillips Achieva scanner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multimodal MEG and Eye Tracking Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prior to the measurement, the head position of the participant was digitized using the Polhemus Fastrack electromagnetic digitiser system (Polhemus Inc., USA). The MEG data were acquired using a 306-sensor TRIUX Elekta Neuromag system (Elekta, Finland), while the participant was sitting in an upright position (60°) in a dim light magnetically shielded room. The magnetic signals were bandpass filtered within 0.1 – 330 Hz with embedded anti-aliasing filters and sampled at 1000 Hz. Simultaneously with the MEG, we also acquired the coordinates of the pupil and the pupil diameter using an EyeLink eye-tracker (SR Research, Canada).
The broadband flickering (or tagging) signals were recorded using a custom-made photodetector (Aalto NeuroImaging Centre, Aalto University, Finland) that was connected to a miscellaneous channel of the MEG system. This allowed us to acquire the tagging signal with the same temporal precision as the MEG data.
Additionally, a high-resolution T1-weighted anatomical image (TR/TE of 7.4/3.5 ms, a flip angle of 7°, FOV of 256×256×176 mm, 176 sagittal slices, and a voxel size of 1×1×1 mm3) was acquired using 3-Tesla Phillips Achieva scanner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

MEG Acquisition and Digitalization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We used a MEGIN system to collect the neuromagnetic signals from 306 sensors, of which 204 were orthogonal planar gradiometers and 102 were magnetometers (Elekta, Finland). For the preparations, we first placed 4 head-position indicator (HPI) coils on the participant’s head: 2 were on the forehead with more than 3 cm distance in between, and the other 2 were on the left and right mastoid bone behind the ears. Then, we used the Polhemus Fastrack electromagnetic digitizer system (Polhemus, United States of America) to digitise the head position by 3 fiducial anatomical markers (the nasion, left and right preauricular points). Next, we digitised the 4 HPI coils. For the final step, we digitised at least 200 points on the scalp to obtain the whole shape of the head. With the help of head digitalization, the MEG head position can be spatially co-registered with the individual structural MRI images for the source modelling analysis.
Afterwards, participants walked to a dimly lit room and sat in the MEG gantry (60 degrees upright position). The distance between the participant and the projector screen was 145 cm, which yielded 1 visual degree from 35 pixels. The MEG data were sampled at 1,000 Hz after the application of an anti-aliasing 0.1 to 330 Hz band-pass filter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Magnetoencephalography Experiment on Tactile Perception

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After digitization of the head‐shape and head‐position coils, digitized with Polhemus Fastrack (Polhemus Inc.), subjects were seated in the MEG with the tactor attached to the left hand. Subjects then completed a training session of 10 trials in which half of the trial contained targets, to familiarize them with the procedure. Subjects then completed the experiment in four blocks of 50 trials, with a short break after the first and third block, and a longer break after the second block, in which they were lowered out of the MEG helmet. Care was taken to reposition subjects in the same position as the initial measurement, using in‐house developed real‐time head localization of the MEG system. The number of subjects and trials were decided a priori, based on previous studies and experience with similar paradigms which were shown to provide sufficient power in similar analyses (e.g., Whitmarsh et al., 2014 (link), 2017 (link)). The analysis and hypothesis testing were performed only after all data were collected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal MEG and MRI Data Acquisition

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEG was acquired using a 306‐sensor TRIUX Elekta Neuromag system (Elekta, Finland). The MEG data were low‐pass filtered at 300 Hz using embedded anti‐aliasing filters and sampled at 1,000 Hz. Head position of the participants was digitized using the Polhemus Fastrack electromagnetic digitizer system (Polhemus Inc.). We also used an EyeLink eye tracker, and vertical and horizontal EOG sensors to remove trials containing blinks and saccades.
The tagging signals were recorded using a custom‐made photodetector (Aalto NeuroImaging Centre, Aalto University, Finland) that was connected to a miscellaneous channel of MEG system. This allowed us to acquire the tagging signal with the same temporal precision as the MEG data.
A high‐resolution T1‐weighted anatomical image (TR/TE of 7.4/3.5 ms, a flip angle of 7°, FOV of 256 × 256 × 176 mm, 176 sagittal slices, and a voxel size of 1 × 1 × 1 mm3) was acquired using 3‐T Phillips Achieva scanner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

MEG Acquisition and Preprocessing Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEG was acquired using a 306-sensor TRIUX Elekta Neuromag system (Elekta, Finland). The MEG data were lowpass filtered at 300 Hz using embedded anti-aliasing filters and sampled at 1000 Hz. Head position of the participants was digitized using the Polhemus Fastrack electromagnetic digitiser system (Polhemus Inc., USA). We also used an EyeLink eye tracker, and vertical and horizontal EOG sensors to remove trials containing blinks and saccades.
The tagging signals were recorded using a custom-made photodetector (Aalto NeuroImaging Centre, Aalto University, Finland) that was connected to a miscellaneous channel of MEG system. This allowed us to acquire the tagging signal with the same temporal precision as the MEG data.
A high-resolution T1-weighted anatomical image (TR/TE of 7.4/3.5 ms, a flip angle of 7°, FOV of 256×256×176 mm, 176 sagittal slices, and a voxel size of 1×1×1 mm 3 ) was acquired using 3-Tesla Phillips Achieva scanner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Postural Sway Measurement Using Magnetic Tracking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Postural sway was measured using Polhemus FASTRACK (Polhemus, Inc, Colchester, Vermont), a magnetic motion tracking system. A tracking system receiver was attached at the seventh cervical vertebrae to record torso movements. 20, 24 Cloth medical tape and Velcro bands were used to avoid slippage during the trial. Data reflecting the 3-dimensional position of the receiver were sampled at 120 Hz for each 60-second trial, yielding a total of 7200 data points per trial. The raw data regarding postural sway were subsequently stored on a laptop computer for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Prefrontal Cortex Hemodynamics via fNIRS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data of localized blood oxygenation levels in the prefrontal cortex indicating neural activity were acquired by a functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) system that included an array of sensors (FOIRE-3000, Shimadzu Co. Japan) worn on the head, which recorded change in cerebral blood flow during task performance. The array of sensors (fNIRS sources and detectors) was equipped with 22 channels and was attached to the head in a location positioned from the prefrontal area in accordance with the International 10–20 system (Figure 2). The sensors were positioned across from each other at 3 cm intervals. Basing on the modified Beer–Lambert law, the oxy-hemoglobin change (Δoxy-Hb, mM·mm) was acquired from the cortical concentration levels. The sites to measure oxy-hemoglobin change associated with cerebral blood flow change were determined using a 3D digitizer (FASTRACK, Polhemus) as previously described [20 (link),21 (link)]. Their placements coincided with Brodmann Areas BA9, BA10, and BA46. The physiological noise from cardiac signal and respiration, and so forth was filtered by a temporal low-pass cut-off at 0.1 Hz.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy for Language Study

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We acquired all fNIRS data with a commercial continuous-wave NIRS system (NIRScout, NIRx Medical Systems, New York). The optical probe contained 16 sources at two different wavelengths (LEDs centered at 760 and 850 nm, 15  mW light power emission for each) and 16 detectors. This configuration enabled the use of 32 source–detector combinations (i.e., channels) at 3 cm, and two source–detector pairs at 0.8 cm (short channels). Data were acquired at 7.8 Hz.
The probe design was arranged to be sensitive to the primary regions related to language and speech in the frontal, temporal, and parietal lobes. We positioned one short channel in each brain hemisphere. The short-channel data enabled us to regress out extracortical contributions hemispherically. To secure the optodes on the heads of the subjects, we used a 10–20 standard cap from NIRx Medical Systems.58 (link) We digitized the position of all optodes using a commercial digitizer (Fastrack, Polhemus, Colchester, Vermont) for better accuracy concerning the location of each source and detector. Figure 1(a) shows a sensitive profile for the probe, which was obtained from Monte Carlo simulations through the AtlasViewer package.59 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Upper Limb Kinematic Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The upper limb movements were recorded using a three-dimensional electromagnetic motion capture system (Fastrack, Polhemus Inc, U.S.A.) and a custom-made data acquisition software written in C. The sensor was placed on the index finger. The three-dimensional position of the sensor was recorded with a sampling frequency of 40 Hz and was time stamped. The upper limb kinematics were recorded and synchronized using the same computer that captured the ECoG, EEG and EMG data. An example of recorded signals is shown in Fig 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!