The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sybr green luna universal qpcr master mix

Manufactured by New England Biolabs
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

SYBR® Green Luna® Universal qPCR Master Mix is a ready-to-use solution for quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) assays. It contains SYBR® Green I dye, a DNA-binding fluorescent dye, and all other necessary components for qPCR reactions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

15 protocols using sybr green luna universal qpcr master mix

1

C. difficile Identification via qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA extraction was performed on all presumptive C. difficile isolates using the Zymo Research Quick-DNA Fungal/Bacterial Miniprep Kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA, USA) with a final elution volume of 50 µl. We confirmed the identity of the presumptive isolates by testing for the C. difficile-specific triosephosphate isomerase (tpi) housekeeping gene in an in-house qPCR assay using the tpi-specific primer set designed by (Lemee et al., 2004 (link)). The qPCR amplification and analysis were performed with a Magnetic Induction Cycler with the micPCRv2.4.0 software (Bio Molecular Systems, Sydney, NSW, Australia). A 20 µl reaction was prepared by mixing 10 µl of 2X Luna Universal qPCR SYBR Green master mix (New England BioLabs, UK) with 7 µl of nuclease-free water, 0.5 µl of both forward and reverse primers (10 µM stock solutions), and 2 µl of template DNA. The temperature cycling parameters were as follows: one cycle of 95°C for 3min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 30s, 60°C for 30s, and 72°C for 30s. A dissociation curve was generated post-amplification with a ramp from 72°C to 95°C to confirm the amplification specificity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Gene expression was assessed using a qRT-PCR assay performed on a CFX connect™ Real-Time System (Bio-Rad, USA). The RT-qPCR reaction was performed in a 10 uL volume and included 2 μl of diluted cDNA, 5 μl of 2X Luna Universal qPCR SYBR Green mastermix (New-England Biolabs, USA) and primers to a final concentration of 500 nM. The following amplification conditions were used: initial denaturation and enzyme activation at 95°C for 60 s, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 s, 60°C for 30 s. Each assay included three technical replicates. The specificity of amplification was assessed by a single peak in the melting curve analysis. For melting curve analysis, a dissociation step cycle was performed at 65°C for 0.5 s followed by a gradual increase of 0.05°C for 0.5 s until 95°C. The raw data generated from this study is stored and available through the following DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.105750.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Corneal Gene Expression Analysis for Viral Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were euthanized by intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (200 mg/kg) and xylazine (13.2 mg/kg) at 24 hours post infection, and individual corneas were resected and transferred to RLT Buffer (RNeasy Mini kit; Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA). Corneas were homogenized with a TissueLyser LT (Qiagen, Germantown, MD, USA) at 50 oscillations/second for two 30-second cycles with the Green Bead Lysis Kit (Next Advance, Troy, NY, USA). RNA was extracted from the tissue homogenate using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, USA). RNA was DNase treated using the DNase 1 kit (Millipore Sigma, Burlington, MA, USA). The RNA was quantified with the Nanodrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Franklin, MA, USA) and normalized for conversion to cDNA with the Protoscript II First Strand Synthesis Kit (New England Bio Labs, Beverly, MA, USA). The quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed using Luna Universal qPCR SYBR green master mix (New England Bio Labs, Beverly, MA, USA) on the QuantStudio3 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Franklin, MA, USA). Analysis was performed using QuantStudio Design and Analysis Software version 1.5.2 using the 2^(-ΔΔCt) method to measure fold change expression relative to actin. Statistics were performed on the ΔCt measurements. All primers used in this study are described in Supplementary Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis for TGC Differentiation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was extracted using phenol-chloroform extraction (TriZOL Reagent; Invitrogen, catalogue #15596-026) from TGCs initially seeded at 2.5 × 104 cells per well in six-well plates at various time points throughout the differentiation time course indicated. cDNA was prepared from total RNA using the Maxima First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Life Technologies, catalogue #K1641). qPCR was performed in triplicate with Luna Universal qPCR SYBR Green Master Mix (New England BioLabs, catalogue #M3003L), where 25 ng of cDNA was loaded per well. Gene expression was evaluated using the ΔΔCt method (Schmittgen and Livak, 2008 (link)). Gapdh levels were used to normalize target gene expression values. For TGC differentiation time courses, gene expression levels were compared with those of TGCs collected at the beginning of differentiation (t = 0 d). For validation of derived TSCs from Arl13b-mCherry;eGFP-centrin2 mice, gene expression levels were normalized to TSCs not derived in this paper.
Primers were validated as intron-spanning using PrimerBLAST (NCBI). Primer sequences are given in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Plasmid-based Transfection Reagents and Antibodies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmids pIRES2-EGFP and PX330 were kindly provided by Prof. Zhanjun Li (Jilin University, China). Plasmid pEGFP-MNDAL-N1 was constructed previously in our lab [2 (link)].
FITC-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L), HRP-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L), HRP-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L), DAPI, Enhanced BCA Protein Assay Kit, BeyoECL Plus kit, Cell lysis buffer for Western and IP, and Caspase3/8/9 ELISA Kit were purchased from Beyotime (Shanghai, China). Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) was purchased from Bioster (Wuhan, China).
TRIM21 rabbit polyclonal antibody, mouse P53 monoclonal antibody, and mouse Bcl-2 polyclonal antibodies were purchased from Proteintech (Wuhan, China). Lipofectamine 3000 Transfection Reagent and PTI-MEM were from Thermo Scientific (USA). Porcine TNF-α and IL-6 ELISA Kits were purchased from Absin (Shanghai, China). Rabbit PCV2 Cap antibody was from Biorbyt (Wuhan, China), and the rabbit anti-PCV2 Cap was prepared previously in the lab (1:200) [26 (link)]. Mouse IFN-α antibody, rabbit IFN-β antibody, mouse IFN-γ antibody, and mouse MNDA antibody were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA). TIANamp Virus DNA/RNA Kit, TRNzol-A+ Reagent, 2× Taq plus PCR Mix, and FastKing-RT SuperMix kit were from Tiangen (Beijing, China). Luna® Universal qPCR Master Mix (SYBR Green) was from New England Biolabs (NEB, Ipswich, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Total RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA extraction was performed using Maxwell® RSC (Promega, Fitchburg, MA, USA), and GoScript™ Reverse Transcriptase (Promega, Fitchburg, MA, USA) was used to obtain cDNA according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Sequences of qPCR primers used were PDK4 Fw: 5′-TCT GAG GCT GAT GAC TGG TG-3′; Rv: 5′-CAG GAA GCA GCA CTG GTG TA-3′ and GAPDH FW: 5′-GTC TCC TCT GAC TTC AAC AGC G-3′; Rv: 5′- ACC ACC CTG TTG CTG TAG CCA A-3′. qPCR was performed using an ABI StepOnePlus thermocycler (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix (SYBR Green) purchased from NEB (Ipswich, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA was isolated according to the RNA Cleanup Kit (NEB, T2030L) protocol, cDNA was prepared using the High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, 4368814), and qPCR was performed using the SYBR Green Luna Universal q-PCR Master Mix (NEB, M3003) on the QuantStudio 7 Flex Real-Time PCR System from Applied Biosystems (4485701). First, the efficiency of 18S primers and of each primer set for each gene of interest (GOI) were determined by computational standard curve analysis (QuantStudio 7 Flex Software). Relative efficiencies were calculated by dividing GOI by 18S RNA; as a base for dCT equations, the square of this value was used. For data analysis, we computed the square of the base minus dCT for each qPCR reaction. Primers were designed with the National Center for Biotechnology Information primer-designing tool and are listed in Supplemental Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Validation of Fibrogenesis and Graft Tolerance Targets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In order to validate some of the specific targets identified by prediction analysis, we decided to concentrate further on processes of lung fibrogenesis and graft tolerance, such as STAT3, SMAD3 and SMAD4 [24 (link),25 (link),26 (link),27 (link)]. RNA was isolated from PBMCs derived from 4 BOS patients, prior to the start and after 6 months of ECP treatment, by miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). MiR-155-5p and miR-23b-3p expression levels were evaluated as described above. To evaluate STAT3, SMAD3 and SMAD4 gene expression, cDNA was retro-transcribed from 1 µg of total RNA using LunaScript RT SuperMix Kit (NEB). Relative levels of STAT3, SMAD3 and SMAD4 mRNA were assessed using SYBR® Green Luna® Universal qPCR Master Mix (NEB) and normalized to the levels of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA. Each experimental condition was performed in triplicate. Relative gene expression level quantification was compared with internal standards and analyzed using the 2−ΔΔCt method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genomic DNA Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The obtained organs (bladder, muscle, liver, heart, lung, spleen, kidney, blood, brain, ear, tail, ovary, tooth, and bone marrow) were washed with 1 × PBS prior to genomic DNA extraction. Genomic DNA was extracted using an automated system (Maxwell® RSC, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and a DNA extraction kit (Maxwell® RSC tissue DNA kit). These steps were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time PCR was performed using an ABI Step One Plus detection system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with SYBR Green (Luna Universal qPCR Master Mix, New England BioLabs Inc., Ipswich, MA, USA). The primer sequences used for the human Alu primer were as follows: forward 5′ CTG GGC GAC AGA ACG AGA TTC TAT 3′; reverse 5′ CTC ACT ACT TGG TGA CAG GTT CA 3′. qPCR was performed with 38 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 5 s and annealing at 60 °C for 20 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Assessment of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from cells using miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). RNA concentration and purity were evaluated using a spectrophotometer (Nanodrop 2000, Thermo Scientific, Madison, WI, USA). cDNA was retrotranscribed from 1 µg of total RNA using LunaScript RT SuperMix Kit (NEB), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Relative levels of Alpha Smooth Muscle Actin (ACTA2) and E-Cadherin (CDH1) mRNA were assessed using SYBR® Green Luna® Universal qPCR Master Mix (NEB) and normalized to the levels of glyceraldehyde-3- phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) mRNA. All reactions were performed on an LC480 Real-Time PCR system (Roche Diagnostics, Vienna, Austria) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Each experiment was performed in triplicate. The threshold cycle (Ct) was defined as the fraction cycle number at which fluorescence exceeded the given threshold. Relative gene expression level quantification was compared with internal standards and analyzed using the 2−∆∆Ct method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!