The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5.0 prism

Manufactured by GraphPad
Sourced in United States

GraphPad Prism 5.0 is a data analysis and graphing software designed for scientific and medical research. It offers a suite of tools for visualizing, analyzing, and presenting data across a range of scientific disciplines. The software provides a user-friendly interface and a comprehensive set of statistical tests and curve-fitting options to help researchers interpret their findings.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

33 protocols using 5.0 prism

1

Statistical Analysis of Experimental Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experimental results were analyzed with GraphPad 5.0 Prism software and presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). A two-tailed unpaired comparison t-test was utilized for comparing differences between two experimental groups. To compare more than two groups, we used a one-way analysis of covariance (ANOVA). The significance level was considered at P < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Statistical Analysis of Immunogenicity Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses were performed using Graphpad 5.0 Prism software. For antibody titer data, group means were compared by a one-tailed, Mann-Whitney t-tests. ELISA data were analyzed by two-tailed, unpaired t-tests or by two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni multiple comparisons. For statistical analyses of in vivo PsV challenges, data was log-transformed and then analyzed by a Kruskal-Wallis test with Dunn’s multiple Comparisons Test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

In Vivo PsV Challenge Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses of in vivo PsV challenges were performed with the Graphpad 5.0 Prism software. Data was log-transformed and then analyzed by unpaired, two-tailed t-tests. Multiple comparisons were analyzed by a one-way ANOVA with Dunnett’s Multiple Comparison Test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Statistical Analysis of In Vitro Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
GraphPad 5.0 Prism software was used for all statistical analyses by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukey multiple comparison post-hoc test. Minimum of four independent in vitro experiments were performed and the data was expressed as mean ± SD. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comparative Statistical Analysis of Datasets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses of the data were carried out using GraphPad 5.0 Prism software. All of the results were represented as the mean ± standard derivation (SD) from three independent experiments. * represents p-value <0.05; ** represents p-value <0.01; *** represents p-value <0.001 by Student's t-test.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Detailed Statistical Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The independent experiment was performed at least three times. The results are shown as mean ± standard deviation (SD). All statistical analyses of the data were carried out using GraphPad 5.0 Prism software. Two groups were analyzed using statistical methods, including Student’s t-test, and other groups by one-way ANOVA with or without Tukey–Kramer multiple comparisons. In all cases, a p value < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant and marked with an asterisk (*). All results are representative of three replicate experiments (ns, no significance).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comparative Analysis of 2-ClHDA Effects

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data are presented as means ± SD. To test differences in groups, statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction (using the GraphPad 5.0 Prism package) as indicated. All values of p ≤ 0.05 were considered significant. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001; * compared to vehicle; # compared to the same concentration of 2-ClHDA.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Triplicate Experimental Analysis with Significance

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated at least three times. Data are presented as mean + SD unless otherwise stated. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Bonferroni correction using GraphPad 5.0 Prism. Values of p ≤ 0.05 were considered significantly different.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Albumin Levels and Platelet Adhesion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differences in groups (low, physiological, and high albumin) were determined by means of one-way ANOVA for repeated measurements with Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test (using the GraphPad 5.0 Prism package). Paired t-test was used to evaluate platelet adhesion measurements on the CPA. All p-values of ≤ 0.05 were considered statistically significant. *… p ≤ 0.05, **… p ≤ 0.01, ***… p ≤ 0.001.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Statistical Analysis of Biological Experiments

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All experiments were repeated three independent times, unless specified and the statistical analysis was done using the GraphPad 5.0 Prism software. To test for statistical significance, the student's t-test and a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used followed by a post hoc Bonferroni's multiple comparisons test to analyze significance compared to the control. A value of p<0.05 was considered significant. Where applicable, replicate values were expressed as a mean ± the standard error of the mean (SEM).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!