The collected demographic data included sex, age, height (without shoes), and weight (to the nearest tenth of a point; measured twice under fasting conditions, without shoes, and wearing light clothing) measured using electronic scales (HBF-375; Omron Health Care, Tokyo, Japan). These data were obtained from the patients’ medical charts. We computed patient body mass index (BMI) by dividing body weight (in kilograms) by the square of height (in meters).
Hbf 375
Manufactured by Omron
Sourced in Japan
The HBF-375 is a body composition monitor that measures body weight, body fat percentage, and body mass index (BMI). It uses bioelectrical impedance analysis technology to provide these measurements.
Automatically generated - may contain errors
Lab products found in correlation
17 protocols using hbf 375
1
Demographic Data Collection Protocol
2
Anthropometric Assessment of Adolescent Nutritional Status
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
All participants were measured using anthropometric indices following a standard method [6 (link)]. Briefly, weight was measured in light indoor clothing, using Omron electronic scales (Japan), and recorded to the closest 0.1 kg. Height was measured without shoes, hat, or jacket, using a tape suspended from the wall, and was recorded to the closest 0.1 cm. Waist circumference (WC) was measured midway between the lower rib margin and the iliac crest, while hip circumference (HC) was measured at the broadest place below the waist. The percentage of body fat (fat mass/total mass × 100) was measured directly by using OMRON HBF 375 scales and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) was performed. Age was calculated specifically on the investigation day. Subcutaneous fat and percentage of lean mass (lean mass/total mass × 100) was also measured directly by OMRON HBF 375. The BMI was calculated as weight/height squared (kg/m2).
The nutritional status of adolescents was classified using age- and gender-specific BMI cut-off points proposed by the World Health Organization 2007. PBF cut-off values for overweight and obese classification were; overweight (≥ 85th percentile for age and gender) and obese (≥ 95th percentile for age and gender).
The nutritional status of adolescents was classified using age- and gender-specific BMI cut-off points proposed by the World Health Organization 2007. PBF cut-off values for overweight and obese classification were; overweight (≥ 85th percentile for age and gender) and obese (≥ 95th percentile for age and gender).
3
Comprehensive Anthropometric Assessment
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Subjects underwent anthropometric assessment to gauge individual health status. Weight and height were measured and body mass index (BMI) was calculated. To assess abdominal obesity, waist circumference (WC) was measured at the midpoint between the lower rib and iliac crest. A body composition monitor (HBF-375, Omron Healthcare, Japan) was used to determine each subject’s body composition, including percentage of body fat (BF), visceral fat (VF), trunk fat (TrF), and muscle mass.
4
Comprehensive Anthropometric Assessment Protocol
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Anthropometric measurements were obtained following standard protocol and instrument [34 ]. These were two length measurements i.e. height (Ht.) and sitting height (SHt.), measured (0.1 cm) by Martin’s anthropometric rod (GPM, Switzerland). Weight (Wt.) was measured (0.1 kg) with an electronic scale (Omron HBF-375 Karada Scan, Japan). Five circumferences i.e. calf (CC), mid upper arm (MUAC), chest (CCN), waist (WC) and hip (HC) were measured by measuring tape. Five skinfolds i.e. calf (CSK), biceps (BSK), triceps (TSK), sub-scapular (SBSK) and supra-iliac (SISK) were measured (0.1 mm) on the left side of the body by Holtain skinfold caliper. Four diameters i.e. bi-epicondylar diameter of humerus (BDH), bi-condylar diameter of femur (BDF), bi-acromial diameter (BAD) and bi-iliac diameter (BID) were measured (0.1 cm) by sliding caliper and spreading caliper (GPM, Switzerland).
5
Anthropometric Measurements: A Standardized Approach
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Weight and height were measured using digital weighing scale and portable stature meter in kg and cm, respectively, in basal condition with minimum clothing and accessories. Waist circumference was measured using a flexible fiberglass tape at the approximate midpoint between the lower margin of the last palpable rib and the top of the iliac crest without clothing and in standing position.[19 ] Hip circumference was measured at the around the widest portion of the buttocks.[19 ] A body composition analyzer (Model: OMRON-HBF-375) based on the principle of bioelectrical impedance was used for estimating body mass index (BMI) and percent body fat.[20 21 ]
6
Anthropometric Measurements and Body Composition
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Subject's baseline assessments were composed of anthropometric measurements, body compositions, and truncal skinfold thickness.
Anthropometric measurements including height, weight, and waist and hip circumferences were taken according to WHO expert consultation, [29 ]. Weight and height were measured using a stadiometer with shoes and heavy clothes removed [29 ]. Waist and hip circumference were determined by tape measure [29 ]. Both BMI (kg/m2) and WHR were calculated. Percentage of body fat, subcutaneous fat, and visceral fat were assessed via bioelectrical impedance (Karada scan: OMRON, Model HBF-375).
Truncal skinfold thickness was assessed at five sites (pectoral, midaxillary, subscapular, suprailiac, and abdomen sites) while subjects were standing using a digital outside skinfold caliper (Moore and Wright, UK) [28 (link)]. Three skinfold thickness measurements were performed at each site and averaged, and these averages were then summed to compute an overall skinfold thickness score [28 (link)].
Anthropometric measurements including height, weight, and waist and hip circumferences were taken according to WHO expert consultation, [29 ]. Weight and height were measured using a stadiometer with shoes and heavy clothes removed [29 ]. Waist and hip circumference were determined by tape measure [29 ]. Both BMI (kg/m2) and WHR were calculated. Percentage of body fat, subcutaneous fat, and visceral fat were assessed via bioelectrical impedance (Karada scan: OMRON, Model HBF-375).
Truncal skinfold thickness was assessed at five sites (pectoral, midaxillary, subscapular, suprailiac, and abdomen sites) while subjects were standing using a digital outside skinfold caliper (Moore and Wright, UK) [28 (link)]. Three skinfold thickness measurements were performed at each site and averaged, and these averages were then summed to compute an overall skinfold thickness score [28 (link)].
7
Anthropometric Measurements and Body Composition Analysis
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Height was measured using a calibrated touchless stadiometer (SONARIS; Cardinal/Detecto, Webb City, Mo, USA) in European American and African American subjects and measured using a 235-Heightronic Digital stadiometer in Asian subjects. A bioelectrical impedance analysis scale (TBF-300; Tanita Corp., Tokyo, Japan) was used to estimate body fat percentage and weight in European American and African American subjects, and an Omron body composition monitor (HBF375, Omron Health Care, Tokyo, Japan) was used in Asian subjects. Body fat percentage was classified into categories according to the study of Gallagher, et al. (2000) [42 (link)] which for standard adults ages 20–39 years are: underfat (BF%< 20% in females, <10% in males), healthy (BF% 20%–34% in females, 10%–21% in males), and overfat/obese (BF%>34% in females, BF%>21% in males). Body mass index (BMI) values were calculated using the standard BMI equation (kg/m2).
8
Cyclist's Adaptive Physiological Profile
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
The predictor variable in this study was the adaptation to physical activity, particularly being a recreational cyclist with the selection criteria mentioned above. The criterion variable was the level of TGF-β1. Participants' identity was collected using structured interviews. In addition, this study also obtained participants' demographic and anthropometric data, lipid profile and fasting blood glucose (FBG) concentration. Participants' age was recorded in years. Anthropometric data were obtained by taking measurements which included: body height (in centimeter) using Microtoise, waist circumference (in centimeter) with a meter, body weight (in kilogram), body mass index (kg/m2), body fat percentage, and visceral fat were measured digitally using the Omron® HBF-375's body composition monitor. Assessment of lipid profile in this study include Triglyceride – TG, Total Cholesterol – Total C, HDL Cholesterol – HDL-C, and LDL Cholesterol – LDL-C. Participants were required to fast for 10–12 h before blood sample for the lipid profile and FBG concentration assessments were taken. The enzymatic colorimetric methods were used to determine the lipid profile and FBG concentration.
9
Comprehensive Assessment of Anthropometrics and Body Composition
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Weight, height, waist circumference and hip circumference were measured by trained data collectors following standard procedure for anthropometric measurements [39 ]. Digital weighing scale (Seca 813, Hamburg, Germany), stadiometer (Seca 213, Hamburg, Germany), and ergonomic circumference measuring tape (Seca 201, Hamburg, Germany) were used. Body composition was assessed by 4-point, bio impedance analyzer (Omron HBF 375, Kyoto, Japan). The values given by the body composition analyzer for fat mass and fat free mass for the whole body and its regions were recorded. The measurements were made between 8.00 and 10.00 a.m., under uniform conditions regarding food and fluids of the subjects. Blood pressure was checked by a medically qualified investigator using digital blood pressure apparatus (Omron HEM 7320, Kyoto, Japan), as per the recommended procedure by the manufacturer. Measurements were validated against standard mercury sphygmomanometer, in every 10th participant to ensure reliability.
10
Bioimpedance Analysis for Body Composition
Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
+ Expand
Body composition was assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis (Omron HBF 375)22 (link)) including body mass index (BMI) and body fat percentage (BF%). Total body water (TBW) was estimated using the Watson formula equations, which are normally used in clinical practice:23 (link)–25 (link))
For data analysis, BF% was divided into “normal” and “obese”. Obesity was defined using the BF% cutoff (> 25% for men and > 35% for women)26 (link)), which revealed a high prevalence of obesity. Total water percentage included “normal” (55%–60% in men and 50%–55% in women) and “lower limit” (< 55%–60% in men and < 50%–55% in women) in the analysis27 ).
For data analysis, BF% was divided into “normal” and “obese”. Obesity was defined using the BF% cutoff (> 25% for men and > 35% for women)26 (link)), which revealed a high prevalence of obesity. Total water percentage included “normal” (55%–60% in men and 50%–55% in women) and “lower limit” (< 55%–60% in men and < 50%–55% in women) in the analysis27 ).
About PubCompare
Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.
We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.
However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.
Ready to get started?
Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required
Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!