The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Pocket colorimeter 2

Manufactured by HACH
Sourced in United States

The Pocket Colorimeter II is a handheld, battery-powered colorimeter designed for measuring the concentration of specific analytes in water samples. It features a simple user interface and compact design for on-site water quality testing.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using pocket colorimeter 2

1

Drinking Water Quality Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Duplicate samples of primary drinking water and secondary water were collected. FCR was measured in one sample using a Hach® Pocket Colorimeter II (Loveland, CO, USA), according to manufacturer’s instructions. The second sample was aseptically collected in a 100 mL sterile bottle containing sodium thiosulfate (IDEXX, Westbrook, ME, USA) for microbiological analysis. Bottles were stored in a cooler containing ice during transport to a laboratory (average 8.5 h, range 3–14.5 h). Samples were tested for the presence of total coliforms and E. coli using the IDEXX Colilert®-18 methodology, according to manufacturer’s instructions. A field blank (distilled water) and positive control (distilled water seeded with fecal waste) were analyzed each day.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Water Quality Analysis in Distribution Systems

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total chlorine was measured during water sample collection using a Pocket Colorimeter II with DPD powder pillows (Hach Company, Loveland, CO, USA). During a subsequent campaign, assimilable organic carbon (AOC) was measured throughout the two systems (August 2015 and May 2017 for chloraminated and no-residual systems, respectively) using the Pseudomonas fluorescens P-17/Spirillum sp. NOX method [17 ]. The chloraminated utility provided raw water temperatures and treated water pH, total chlorine, hardness, free ammonia (NH 3+NH4+ ), nitrate (NO 3 ), and orthophosphate (P O43 ) for 2014. Water temperatures, total chlorine, free ammonia, and nitrate were also provided for 13 monitoring sites in the distribution system for 2014. The no-residual utility provided raw water temperatures and treated water pH, total chlorine, hardness, ammonium (NH 4+ ), and nitrate for 2014 to 2015. Free ammonia in the no-residual DWDS was estimated from ammonium using pH and temperature, as previously described [18 ]. In addition to water temperature, orthophosphate and total phosphorus were measured at three sites in the no-residual DWDS in May 2017 using Hach assay number LCK 349. The utilities analyze water quality using methods compliant with either the United States Environmental Protection Agency (chloraminated DWDS) or the Standards Norway (no-residual DWDS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Water Quality Measurement Methods

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Water temperature was measured in accordance with the APHA St. Method 2550 B (20 ) using alcohol thermometer with graduation intervals of 0.1 °C. Residual free chlorine was measured according to ISO 7393-2:2018 (21 ) (quantification limit of Cl2 0.02 mg/L) using portable colorimeter Pocket Colorimeter™ II (Hach, Loveland, CO, USA). Electrical conductivity and pH values of the water were measured using multi-channel, modular instrument SevenExcellence (S47; Mettler Toledo, Giessen, Germany) according to ISO 7888:1985 (22 ) (quantification limit 9 µS/cm) and ISO 10523:2008 (23 ), respectively.
Turbidity was measured according to ISO 7027-1:2016 (24 ) (quantification limit 0.10 NTU) using laboratory turbidimeter 2100N IS (Hach). Permanganate index (consumption of KMnO4) was determined according to ISO 8467:1993 (25 ) (quantification limit of O2 0.25 mg/L). Quality control was performed with resorcinol (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) with recovery of 90-105%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Grab Sampling Across Water Reclamation Trains

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Grab samples were taken across the water reclamation treatment trains (Figure 1). All samples were collected in amber glass bottles and stored in darkness at 4 °C until analysis. Chlorine concentrations were measured with chlorine test kits (Pocket Colorimeter II, Hach, Loveland, CO, USA) at plants A and B, where sodium hypochlorite was added upstream of the MF and SF processes (Figure 1). To quench residual chlorine and stop the formation of N-Nitrosamines, sodium thiosulfate was added to all samples except secondary effluent to give a final concentration of 10 mg/L. Water temperature, pH, and conductivity were measured on site with a multi-function water quality meter (U-52G, Horiba, Kyoto, Japan). Operating pressures and flows were monitored within the plants. Sampling campaigns were conducted at plant A from January 2013 to August 2014 (n = 3), at plant B from December 2012 to December 2014 (n = 3), and at plant C from June 2013 to January 2014 (n = 5).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Assessing Water Quality Parameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The LSI was calculated according to WAC/III/A/011 (58 ) (Table 1). The pH, conductivity, and calcium concentration were measured using a Multi-parameter analyzer C1010 (Consort, Belgium), a Hanna Edge Conductivity Meter (HANNA Instruments, Belgium), and the Total Hardness Test (Merck, Belgium), respectively. The alkalinity of the water samples was determined based on WAC/III/A/006 (59 ). Using 1M NaOH and 1M HCl (Chem-lab, Belgium), the pH was adapted to the higher and lower Langelier Saturation Index (LSI) (Table 2). In addition, HOCl solution was added to have a free chlorine concentration of 0.20 and 0.28 mg/L, for the groundwater and surface water samples, respectively. The chlorine concentrate solution was prepared by the addition of a NaOCl tablet (B-Care Chemicals, Belgium) to 1 L ultrapure water (Milli-Q, Merck Millipore, Germany). The amount of free chlorine was quantified with the Pocket Colorimeter II (Hach, Belgium). Samples of the bulk water were taken every 2 h over a period of 8 h to measure with flow cytometry.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evaluating Household Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Field workers
observed drinking water storage conditions and recorded user-reported
water treatment practices. In households reporting chlorination, they
measured the free chlorine residual in stored drinking water with
a digital colorimeter (Hach Pocket Colorimeter II). They inspected
the compounds for latrine access, presence of an improved latrine
as defined by the Joint Monitoring Programme for Water Supply and
Sanitation,30 and latrine functionality
and condition. They recorded caregiver-reported child defecation and
child feces handling practices. Field staff also examined caregiver
and index child hands (fingernails, fingerpads, palms) for visible
dirt as a proxy for handwashing behavior31 (link) and checked for the presence of water and soap within six steps
of the latrine and kitchen. Finally, they observed food storage conditions
such as whether the storage container was covered or elevated to assess
if these were indirectly affected by the interventions even though
the intervention packages did not entail any materials and behavioral
messages for hygienic storage of food.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Water Quality Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Free and total chlorine were measured using the N,N-diethyl-p-phenylenediamine (DPD) Method (Pocket ColorimeterTM II, Hach, Loveland, CO, USA); pH and temperature (ExTech 407227, Extech Instruments, Nashua, NH, USA); hardness (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) Titration Method, Hach, Loveland, CO, USA); turbidity (2100 Q Portable Turbidimeter, Hach, Loveland, CO, USA); ferrous and total iron (1, 10 phenanthroline Method, Hach, Loveland, CO, USA); and absorbance and ultraviolet transmittance (UVT) of the test water at 255, 265, and 280 nm (DR6000 UV-VIS spectrophotometer, Hach, Loveland, CO, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Electrolyzed Water and Ozonated Water Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eloclear® electrolyzed water (EW) was provided by Ozo Innovations (Kidlington, United Kingdom). The EW was manufactured electrochemically in single-cell units with a pH ∼8.7–9.3 and a free available chlorine (FAC) concentration between 1800 and 2000 mg L–1, determined (and checked prior to experiments) using the HACH® DPD Free Chlorine Reagent (Permachem®) in a HACH® Pocket ColorimeterTM II. EW was stored in plastic containers in the dark at 4°C for up to 2 weeks. Dilutions (v/v) were prepared in HPLC grade water immediately prior to use. NaOCl solution was purchased from ACROS OrganicsTM, Fisher Scientific (5% chlorine). Ozonated water was produced using an Enozo Sanitizing Spray Bottle (SB-100HD) from Enozo Technologies, Inc. (North Andover, MA, United States), kindly provided by GreenTeck Global (Wallingford, United Kingdom). The bottle was filled with sterile filtered tap water (4°C) and ozonated water was produced by spraying for 5 s. The water was used within 30 s (in vitro experiments) or 2 min (yeast treatments) of its generation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Analytical Procedure for Chlorinated DBPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Free chlorine was measured by a portable photometer (Hach Pocket Colorimeter TM II, USA).
HAcAms and THMs were extracted at the end of the predetermined contact time by adding 2 g anhydrous sodium sulfate and 2 mL MTBE to 10 mL aqueous sample, which was then shaken using a IKA oscillator (Staufen, German) at 2800 r/min. Extracted samples were analyzed soon after (less than 3 h) by gas chromatography equipped with electron capture detection (GC/ECD, QP2010plus, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan) using a previously detailed analytical method [33, 34] . HANs were analyzed with a purge & trap sample concentrator (eclipse4660, OI, USA) and gas chromatograph/mass spectrometry (GC/MS, QP2010, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan). The detailed information of analyses about HANs is available on previous studies [34, 35] . The detection limits for CF, DCAN, DCAcAm, TCAcAm were 0.07, 0.11, 1.27, and 1.62 μg/L, respectively. Intermediate products were analysed by gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS, QP2020, Shimadzu Corporation, Japan), with detailed information is available on supporting data. DBPs yields are defined in % mol/mol as the molar ratio of the produced DBPs to the initial Apap (Eq.
(1)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!