The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lambda 25 uv visible spectrophotometer

Manufactured by PerkinElmer
Sourced in United States

The Lambda 25 UV/Visible spectrophotometer is a compact, high-performance instrument designed for a wide range of spectroscopic applications. It features a dual-beam optical system, a wavelength range of 190 to 1100 nanometers, and a photometric range of -4 to 4 Absorbance units. The instrument provides accurate and reliable measurements for various sample types, including liquids, solids, and gases.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using lambda 25 uv visible spectrophotometer

1

Antioxidant Activity of Amaranthus hybridus Leaf Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The antioxidant activity in the leaf extracts of Amaranthus hybridus was determined using the DPPH (diphenyl-picrylhydrazyl) and ABTS (2,2’-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)) radical degradation technique.
DPPH assay: 10 μL of leaf extract is treated with 1 mL (250 μM) DPPH solution and incubated in dark at room temperature for 30 min. A change in color is estimated by recording the absorbance at 517 nm in a Perkin Elmer Lambda 25 UV/Visible spectrophotometer [39 (link)].
ABTS+ assay: Equal amount of ABTS (7.4 mM) and potassium persulfate (2.6 mM) were mixed and incubated at room temperature for 12 h in the dark. ABTS solution and the leaf extracts were mixed in a 19:1 ratio and incubated in the dark for 2 h. The absorbance against methanol was measured at 734 nm using a Perkin Elmer Lambda 25 UV/Visible spectrophotometer [40 (link),41 (link)].
The percent inhibition of DPPH and ABTS+ relative to the control was used to determine antioxidant activity using the following equation:
where Abs. blank—absorbance of the control 10 μL methanol for DPPH and 150 μL methanol for ABTS instead of Amaranthus hybridus leaf extract.
Abs. sample is the absorbance of the leaf extracts.
Ascorbic acid was used as a reference standard, and the results obtained are expressed as μg ascorbic acid equivalent g−1 (μg AAE g−1) dry weight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Nanoparticle Sol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The size distribution of sol particles was measured by a dynamic light scatter (Brookhaven, Holtsville, NY, USA, 90 plus). Infrared spectra were recorded on a PerkinElmer RXI FT-IR spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA). Absorption spectra were measured with a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 25 UV-visible spectrophotometer. The microstructure of the sample was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan, S-4800). Material thermal stability was measured by the thermogravimetry analysis (TGA, SDT-Q600, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA). The refractive index of the optical films was measured by using the N & K analyzer (1280, n & k Technology, San Jose, CA, USA). The reflection and transmission spectroscopy were first measured and the data were calculated by using the Forouhi-Bloomer model to test the goodness of the fit. This process generates the values of refractive index (n) and extinction coefficient (k) which provide a basis of data to produce a new reflection curve through calculation. The curve fitting was repeated until this new reflection curve closes to the measured curve with the goodness of fit greater than 0.99. The obtained refractive index and extinction coefficient are reliable after the calculation and curve fitting. In the fitting process, the film thickness can simultaneously be obtained.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying Total Flavonoid Content

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Quercetin was considered as the standard sample to compare the total flavonoid contents present in the plant extracts; 5% NaNO3 was added to the leaf extract and mixed by vortexing. The mixture was allowed to stand for 6 min, following which, 10% AlCl3 was added to the and incubated at room temperature for 5 min. Next, 1 M NaOH was added and the volume was made up to 5 mL with distilled water. The mixture was further incubated at 40 °C for 20 min, after which the absorbance was recorded at 430 nm using a Perkin Elmer Lambda 25 UV/Visible spectrophotometer [43 (link)]. The total flavonoid content (TFC) was calculated using the standard quercetin calibration curve, y = 0.605x + 0.0132, R2 = 0.9956 and was expressed in mg QE/g dry extract weight.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Hemolytic Evaluation of Reinforced Grafts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh whole blood obtained from New Zealand white rabbits’ ear veins was anticoagulated and utilized to test the hemolytic performance of the reinforced grafts. The blood was centrifuged (Biofuge Primo Model R centrifuge, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and washed with PBS five times following standard procedures as reported [37 (link),38 (link)]. A volume of 1 mL of red blood cells (RBCs) was suspended in 34 mL PBS. Then, 0.2 mL of the RBCs suspension was transferred to a 5 mL Eppendorf tube, which was filled with either 0.8 mL of deionized water as the positive control, or PBS buffer as the negative control. The reinforced graft samples were incubated in the suspension containing 0.2 mL of diluted RBCs and 0.8 mL of PBS buffer at 37 °C for 2 h, followed by centrifugation for 3 min at 10,000 rpm with an Eppendorf 5415 Model R centrifuge (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Then, the optical density of the supernatant was determined by a Perkin Elmer Lambda 25 UV–visible spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA) at 540 nm. The HP was calculated using Equation (4) [39 (link),40 (link)]: HP(%)=DsDncDpcDnc×100
where Ds is the absorbance of the sample, and Dpc and Dnc are the absorbances of the positive and negative controls, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

General Organic Reaction Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
General: All the reactions
were carried out in oven-dried glassware. The chemicals and solvents
were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, Spectrochem, or Acros and were
used without any purification except THF (tetrahydrofuran), which
was dried by refluxing over sodium followed by distillation. Reactions
were monitored by TLC, which are precoated by silica gel (Kieselgel
60F 254, Merck), and the spots were detected under UV light (254 nm).
Compounds were purified by column chromatography using silica gel
(particle size 100–200 mesh). 1H and 13C NMR spectra were characterized in CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 solution by using (Wormhole-vnmrs/Bruker/Jeol-Delta/Varian)
400/300 MHz spectrophotometers. Chemical shifts are reported as ppm
(δ) relative to TMS (δ 0.0) as the internal standard. 1H NMR data is recorded as follows: chemical shift [multiplicity,
coupling constant(s) J (Hz), relative integral] where
multiplicity is defined as s (singlet), d (doublet), t (triplet),
q (quartet), m (multiplet), and bs (broad singlet). Mass spectra were
recorded on a 6430 Triple quardrupole mass spectrometer for ESI and
are given in m/z. FTIR spectra were
recorded on a PerkinElmer 1600 series FTIR spectrophotometer. UV spectra
were recorded on a PerkinElmer Lambda 25 UV–visible spectrophotometer
(USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HPLC-EC Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC system (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, USA) linked with a DECADE II Electrochemical Detector (Antec Leyden, Netherland), HPLC column Discovery HS C18 RP chromatographic column (250 mm × 4.6 mm, 5 μm; Bellefonte, USA). Lambda-25 UV/Visible spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer). Centrifuge machine (Centurion scientific Ltd) and Incubator (Incucell Med Center GmbH Germany) were used in the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Aerobic and Anaerobic Growth Conditions for Escherichia coli

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Strains were grown in gas-sparged Roux bottles at 37°C in MOPS (morpholinepropanesulfonic acid) minimal medium with 0.2% glucose and the indicated amount of FeSO4 (36 (link)). For ChIP-seq or ChIP-chip (ChIP with microarray technology) analysis of MG1655 or PK9427 and for transcriptomic analysis of MG1655, PK9427, PK10474, and PK10475 the medium contained 10 µM FeSO4. For ChIP-seq analysis of JEM609 (MG1655 ΔlacZ, ΔtonB, ΔfeoABC, ΔzupT [19 (link)]) the medium contained 1.0 µM FeSO4 to promote iron deficiency. A gas mixture of 70% N2, 5% CO2, and 25% O2 was used for aerobic experiments, and a gas mixture of 95% N2 and 5% CO2 was used for anaerobic experiments (36 (link)). Cells were harvested at an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.3 to 0.35, measured using a Perkin Elmer Lambda 25 UV/visible spectrophotometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of iron in HmuW

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ferrozine assay was used to quantitate the amount of iron in HmuW after reconstitution (51 (link)). A solution containing 300 μl of HmuW, 333 μl of 2 M guanidine hydrochloride, 40 μl of 12 M HCl, and 100 μl of 100 mM freshly prepared L-ascorbic acid was mixed thoroughly. The solution was centrifuged to remove the insoluble particulates. The supernatant was neutralized with 100 μl of 5 M ammonium acetate and then 10 μl of 100 mM ferrozine (3-(2-pridyl)-5,6-diphenyl-1,2,4-triazine-p,p’-disulfonic acid monosodium salt hydrate) was added. The solution was diluted to 1 ml and then incubated at 21 °C for 30 min. The absorbance of the iron–ferrozine complex was recorded at 562 nm using a Lambda 25 UV-visible spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer). The iron content was determined by comparing this reading to a standard curve that was generated under identical conditions using ferrous ammonium sulfate (Fe(NH4)2(SO4)2) with a concentration range from 0 to 120 μM.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Enzymatic Extraction and Invertase Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To obtain the enzymatic extract, 0.5 g of biocatalyst was added with 5 mL of distilled water, stirred with a magnetic bar for 5 min and ltered (Whatman 41). Sucrose (0.1 M) in 0.1 M acetate buffer at pH 5 was used as substrate for enzymatic activity assays. Test tubes with 0.9 mL of the substrate and incubated at 50°C were added with 0.1 mL of enzyme extract; after 10 min of incubation, 1.5 mL of DNS reagent was added. All tubes, both for the standard curve and the enzymatic assay, were placed in a boiling water bath for 15 min. Finally, absorbance was read in a Perkin Elmer Lambda 25 UV-Visible spectrophotometer at a wavelength of 640 nm. A standard curve was generated with 250 mg of glucose and 250 mg of fructose in 0.1 M acetate buffer at pH 5. Invertase activity was determined through the release of reducing sugars determined by the Miller method [18] . One unit of enzymatic activity (U) was de ned as the amount of enzyme needed to release one micromole of reducing sugars per minute.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Sucrose Hydrolysis Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The reducing sugars were determined to calculate the hydrolysis rate and quantify the continuous hydrolysis of sucrose. A standard curve was generated as described in Sect. 2.4.1. To determine the reducing sugars, a 1:1,000 dilution was made; from these dilutions, 1 mL was taken and 1.5 mL of DNS reagent [18] was added, the tubes were placed in a boiling water bath for 15 min. Absorbance was read at 640 nm on a Perkin Elmer Lambda25 UV-Visible spectrophotometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!