The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Ihr550 spectrometer

Manufactured by Horiba
Sourced in Japan

The IHR550 spectrometer is an optical instrument designed for spectroscopic analysis. It is capable of precisely measuring the wavelength-dependent characteristics of light. The core function of the IHR550 is to disperse and analyze the spectrum of incident light, providing detailed information about the properties of the light source or sample under examination.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using ihr550 spectrometer

1

Angle-Dependent Photoluminescence Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The angle-dependent photoluminescence (PL) spectra were measured by a Horiba iHR550 spectrometer equipped with a silicon CCD detector array51 (link). A 532 nm laser (spot size ∼1 μm, laser power of 70 μW) was used as the excitation source. The incident laser was focused by a Nikon Eclipse Ti microscope with a 50 × (NA = 0.7) objective. In the measurements, the polarization direction of the incident laser light was parallel to the long axis of COF crystals. A linear polarizer was placed in the collecting optical path to detect the angle dependence of the PL emission. The polarized PL images were collected using Olympus BX-51-P fluorescence microscope at different polarization angles (by rotating the stage). We used a filter set which provided a narrow wavelength range (450 to 490 nm) for excitation, and allowed that emitted light at wavelengths above 515 nm passed to the detector. All optical experiments were performed in ambient environment and at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Microcrystalline Powder Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microcrystalline powders were characterized using XRD with a D/Max-2500PC diffractometer (Rigaku, Japan) involving CuK α radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å) in the 10–70° 2θ range at a scan rate of 0.01° min−1. Micro-Raman spectroscopy was carried out using an iHR550 spectrometer (Horiba Jobin-Yvon, Japan) coupled to a charge-coupled device (CCD) detector and an argon-ion laser (MellesGriot, USA) operating at 633 nm with a maximum power of 200 mW. The spectra were measured in the 50–1000 cm−1 range. The SEM images were analyzed using field emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM) on an FEI instrument (Model Inspect F50) operating at 5 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Micro-PL Measurements for Pressure Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Micro-PL measurements were carried out at room temperature with a microscope imaging system. A continuous-wave laser with wavelength of 532 nm and stable power of 10 mW was focused on the sample in a DAC device by a long working distance objective (50×; numerical aperture, 0.35), and the focus spot size was about 7 μm. In the experiment, the laser power below 18 mW is safe for the sample. The PL signal from the sample was collected by the same objective and then sent to a HORIBA iHR550 spectrometer, where the final detection was carried out by a liquid nitrogen–cooled charge-coupled device. The data acquisition time of the PL measurements is 1 s. The pressure was applied by a DAC device with 300-μm diameter of culets. Silicone oil was used as the pressure-transmitting medium, and the pressure was determined by the shift of the R1 fluorescence line of ruby at alongside of the sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Absorption and Luminescence Spectroscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CD and absorption spectroscopy data were collected by a CD spectrometer (JASCO J-815). PL measurements were carried out using a setup with a 405-nm excitation laser (PicoQuant PDL 800-D) and a Horiba iHR 550 spectrometer. A single-photon avalanche photodiode detector (Micro Photon Devices PD-100-CTE) and a constant fraction discriminator (PicoQuant PicoHarp 300) were further used for TCSPC measurements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRD was measured using a Bruker D8 advance diffractometer with Cu-K α radiation (λ = 1.5418 nm) in Bragg-Brentano (θ-2θ) geometry over a range of 20-60°. The applied acceleration voltage was set to 60 kV and the heating current was 30 mA. Raman spectroscopy was performed using a Jubin-Yvon iHR 550 spectrometer (HORIBA Jobin-Yvon, GER) with a 60x objective (Zeiss, GER). The laser was powered by 2.5 mW at a wavelength of 532 nm. To measure the samples, an exposure time of 60 s averaged over 3 spectra was used together with a grating of 1800 grooves per mm and a front opening of 1000 μm. RBS and NRA measurements were performed at the 4 MV tandem accelerator of the RUBION facility (Ruhr University Bochum, Germany). For RBS, a 2 MeV 4 He + beam (intensity 40-50 nA) incident to the sample at a tilt angle of 7°w as used. NRA analysis was performed using a 1 MeV deuteron beam at an equal tilt angle. The emitted protons were detected with a silicon detector. The backscattered particles were
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Micro-Raman Analysis of Bulk MoSe2 Flake

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A single-crystal 2H-type bulk MoSe2 flake bought from HQ Graphene was measured by micro-Raman spectroscopy. For the Raman measurement, we used 8 different excitation sources: the 325- and 441.6-nm (3.82 and 2.81 eV) lines of a He-Cd laser; the 457.9-, 488-, and 514.5-nm (2.71, 2.54, and 2.41 eV) lines of an Ar+ laser; the 532-nm (2.33 eV) line of a diode-pumped-solid-state laser; the 632.8-nm (1.96 eV) line of a He-Ne laser; and the 784.8-nm (1.58 eV) line of a diode laser. The laser beam was focused onto the flake by using a 50 × objective lens (0.8 N.A.) for all excitation wavelengths except for the 325-nm excitation for which a 40 × uv objective lens (0.5 N.A.) was used. The scattered signal was collected by the same objective lens (backscattering geometry) and was dispersed with a Jobin-Yvon Horiba iHR550 spectrometer. Either a 1200-grooves/mm (630-nm blaze) or a 2400-grooves/mm (400-nm blaze) grating was chosen to acquire the best signal to noise ratio. A liquid-nitrogen-cooled back-illuminated charge-coupled-device detector was used, and thin-film interference filters (RazorEdge Filters) from Semrock were used to reject the Rayleigh-scattered light. The laser power was kept at 100  μW for all the measurement to avoid local heating of the sample. The spectral resolution was below 1 cm−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Characterization of Graphene and GaN

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology of graphene and GaN films were measured by SEM (Jeol-7500F) and AFM in tapping mode (Bruker Dimension ICON-PT). Raman spectroscopy (Renishaw inVia, 532 nm laser excitation) was performed to characterize the quality of graphene and the stress state of GaN films. The chemical states of graphene were measured by an ESCALab 250 Analytical XPS spectrometer with a monochromatic X-ray source (Al Kα, hν = 1486.6 eV). The binding energies of the spectra were referred to that of the C 1s peak at ~284.8 eV. The crystalline quality of GaN films characterized with a Rigaku Ultima IV XRD with Cu Kα radiation (0.154056 nm), and the structural properties of GaN films were investigated by aberration corrected Thermo Fisher Scientific Titan Cubed Themis G2 transmission electron microscope operated at 300 kV and equipped with Bruker Super-X EDX detector. The PL spectra of InGaN/GaN MQWs were measured by a PL system which includes a He-Cd laser (325 nm, 30 mW) as an excitation source, a Jobin Yvon iHR550 spectrometer, a Syncerity charge coupled device (CCD) and a closed circle helium cryostat.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Structural Characterization of Ag2CrO4

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The Ag 2 CrO 4 was structurally characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using a D/MAX-2500 PC diffractometer (Rigaku) with Cu Ka radiation (l = 1.5406 Å). The data were recorded in the normal routine for 2y values ranging from 151 to 601 with a scanning velocity of 21 min À1 . Micro-Raman measurements were conducted using an iHR550 spectrometer (Horiba Jobin Yvon, Japan) coupled to a CCD detector and an Ag ion laser (MellesGriot, USA) operating at 514.5 nm with a maximum power of 200 mW and a fiber microscope. The measurements were performed in the range of 30-1000 cm À1 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Variable-excitation Energy PL Measurements

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Variable-excitation
energy PL
measurements were acquired with an Edinburgh Instruments FLS980 photoluminescence
spectrometer at wavelengths of 250 and 275 nm. Confocal PL data was
acquired with a Horiba-Jobin-Yvon iHR550 spectrometer with an excitation
wavelength of 405 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Raman Spectroscopy of Microscopic Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raman spectra were collected using an inverted Raman microscope with an Olympus IX73 frame and objectives with a Horiba iHR 550 Spectrometer with a neural synapse thermoelectrically cooled charge-coupled device (CCD) detector attached to a Horiba ONDAX T-Hz Raman 532 nm laser provided by Justin Sambur. This setup was accompanied with a LabSpec software package. The specimen was prepared by drop-casting 3–7 μL of sample onto a glass cover slip and allowed to dry in air at room temperature. We used double-sided tape to seal the sample and to adhere the coverslip to a glass slide. Spectra were collected using an incident laser power of 83 mW. We used a 60x water objective with a 1200 blazes/mm grating, which has a resolution of approximately 2 cm−1 per pixel. We manually focused the laser on the sample using the optical setup. If signal was insufficient, we refocused the laser until signal was obtained. We used the software’s denoiser program, which is essentially a smoothing algorithm, to obtain a smoother curve. Backscatter collection ranged from 30 – 300 seconds per acquisition, and a total of 1 – 15 spectra were accumulated and averaged, depending on the level of noise. Any spikes caused by cosmic rays were removed using the software’s spike removal function.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!