The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

32 protocols using iomeron

1

Coronary Artery Computed Tomography Angiography

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CCTA was performed with a 128 × 2 × 0.625 mm or 64 × 0.625 mm detector rows scanner (ICT 256 or Brilliance 64; Philips Healthcare, Cleveland, OH) using our routine coronary arteries assessment protocol. In brief, an average of 70 to 90 mL of iodinated contrast material at a concentration of 400 mg iodine per mL (Iomeron; Bracco, Milano, Italy) and rates of 5 to 6 mL/sec were injected and timed using an automated bolus-tracking technique, placed at the descending aorta. To permit visualization of the right heart, we use three injection phases: first is the phase of contrast only (55–70 mL), second is the phase of mixed 50% contrast and 50% saline (total of 30–40 mL), and the third phase of 40 mL of saline flush. We used a prospective (step and shoot) mode scan for every patient with a heart rate <70 bpm or retrospective gating with dose modulation in patients with higher heart rates. During image acquisition, all patients were in sinus rhythm. Data were reconstructed at a slice thickness of 0.8 mm with an increment of 0.4 mm.
Oral β-blockers (metoprolol 50 mg) were given to patients who were not pretreated with β-blockers (n = 175) in case of a heart rate >60 bpm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiphasic CT Imaging in Liver Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients with CLM underwent a standardized CT protocol with multiphasic breath-hold acquisitions including a pre-contrast phase, an automatically bolus-triggered arterial phase, a portal phase (75 s—contrast administration delay), and an equilibrium (late) phase (3 min—contrast administration delay). Contrast administration (Iomeron 300 mg/mL; Bracco Diagnostics, Milan, Italy) was followed by a 30-mL saline flush (0.9%). As is typical for liver imaging, the dose of contrast agent was maximized, ranging 90–150 mL according to patients’ body weight. Bolus tracking over the abdominal aorta near the celiac axis (threshold at 120 Hounsfield units) was used to time the arterial acquisition. CT images were acquired on three different devices (Philips Healthliners, Amsterdam, The Netherlands and GE Healthcare, Wauwatosa (WI), USA) with a similar set-up in terms of detector collimation (0.625 mm), current (280–400 mA), tension (120–140 kV), and pitch (0.975). Automatic exposure control based on the X-ray attenuation on scout images was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Long-term Coronary Graft Patency Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The first follow-up at a mean of 36 months was performed with conventional angiography in 99 patients (92%). The second and current follow-up was performed at 97 months using computed tomography (CT) angiography with a Somatom Flash dual-source CT scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). All subjects received 0.25 mg of nitroglycerin sublingually. Those with a heart rate >70 bpm and no contraindications were also given up to 10 mg of metoprolol intravenously before the examination. Contrast media (60-70 mL of Iomeron 400 mg/mL; Bracco, Milan, Italy) was administered with a pressure injector at a flow rate of 6 mL/s, followed by a 60-mL saline bolus. Scanning started at the left subclavian artery and ended at the base of the heart. The images were reviewed on a Siemens SyngoVia workstation. All images were independently reviewed by 2 thoracic radiologists who were blinded to group assignment. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. Where possible, the studies were compared with reports and images from previous coronary angiographies. A graft was judged as occluded when the graft was not opacified by contrast media. Graft stenosis was deemed significant when the narrowing of the lumen diameter was >50% relative to the adjacent parts of the vessel.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Postoperative CTA Evaluation of Aortic Aneurysm

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Within 1 week postoperatively, all patients underwent CTA examination carried out with Somatom 64 (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). A triphasic CT protocol was used with a precontrast phase, an arterial phase (started with bolus tracking), and a late phase at 120 sec, using 130 mL of nonionic contrast agent: Iomeron (Bracco, Milan, Italy) at 4 mL/s. The other scanning parameters were the following: 1.2mm acquisition; reconstruction with a soft-margin kernel algorithm (B30) at 1.5 and 3 mm with a reconstruction increase of 1.5 mm; precontrast scans at a low-power tube (120 mAs); the other phases at 120 kV and 200 mAs.
Images were analyzed on a dedicated workstation (Aquarius; Ter-aRecon, San Matteo, CA) using conventional postprocessing techniques. CTAs were evaluated by 2 radiologists with more than 10 years of experience in the field. The size of the aneurysm sac, the integrity of the prosthesis, and the presence or absence and type of endoleak were evaluated.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Thoracic CT Imaging Protocol with Advanced Reconstruction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All CT examinations were performed with a 320-detector row CT scanner (Aquilion ONE GENESIS, Canon Medical). For each CT, the main parameters were as follows: helical acquisition, 0.5 mm × 80 rows; beam pitch, 0.813; gantry rotation time, 0.35 s; matrix, 512 × 512; and field of view, 320 mm. Tube voltage was 120 kVp, 100 kVp, or 80 kVp. Automatic tube-current modulation (SUREExposure™ 3D, Canon Medical) was used for all CTs. The noise-index settings were based on our initial experience in clinical practice and on the manufacturer’s recommendations. Reconstruction parameters were 1.0-mm slice thickness and 0.8-mm gap. Table 1 lists the acquisition and reconstruction parameters. In accordance with our standard CTA protocol involving subtraction, all patients received a fixed 65-mL intravenous bolus of Iomeron, 350 mg iodine per mL (Bracco Imaging, Courcouronnes, France), followed by a 50-mL bolus of saline at an injection rate of 4 mL/s for both. Image acquisition was triggered using a predefined threshold of aortic-arch attenuation. Each CT scan was reconstructed using both H-IR (AIDR 3D) with a standard FC43 kernel and DLR with beam-hardening correction (AiCE Body Sharp).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Contrast-Enhanced Cardiac Imaging after MI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Contrast electrocardiography-gated MDCT was performed using a 16-row MDCT scanner (SOMATOM Emotion 16-slice configuration; Siemens) under general anesthesia. MDCT was performed before infarction, and at 1 week (pretreatment), 8 weeks, and 12 weeks after MI. Four beagles that had tachycardia at MDCT were excluded from the analysis because of compromised image quality (biodegradable group, n = 6; nonbiodegradable group, n = 6; no-treatment group,n = 7). MDCT was performed after intravenous injection of 30 mL of nonionic contrast medium (Iomeron; Bracco). All images were analyzed on a workstation (AZE VirtualPlace Lexus64; AZE). The LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDV), LV end-systolic volume (LVESV), and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were obtained from the workstation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multidetector CT Imaging of Rectum

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
CT studies were performed using a 64-section multidetector CT scanner (Lightspeed VCT 64; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA). The scans were carried out using the following parameters: 5 mm section thickness (reconstructed with a 2 mm thickness, with an overlap of 1 mm), pitch of 5.5, 120 kV, and 130–181 mA. The exams were performed with a first unenhanced acquisition followed by the administration of 90–140 mL (according to patient weight) of the tri-iodinated nonionic contrast agent Iomeron® (Bracco, Milan, Italy [350 mg iodine per mL]) at a flow rate of 2–3 mL/s into an antecubital vein by using an automated power injector. The study was acquired in portal-venous phase using bolus tracking; a Region Of Interest (ROI) was placed over the descending aorta and a threshold of 150 HU was selected. Once this had been reached, a multiphasic study was performed with scans acquired in late arterial phase (after 25–30 s), portal venous phase (after 45–60 s), and delayed phase (after 180–300 s). Moreover, multiplanar reformation on sagittal, para-coronal, and para-axial planes, oriented on the rectal axis, might be obtained, provided useful information in most challenging cases, where surgery determined a substantial alteration of normal anatomy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Anatomical Features of Head/Neck CTA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In this retrospective study, patients who had undergone a head/neck CTA for a follow‐up of a head and neck malignancy, or for staging of tumors located in other regions than head and neck, were included in the study. Head/neck scans were acquired in a helical mode in craniocaudal direction at 120 kV tube voltage where Iomeron 300 mg/mL (Bracco Imaging SpA, Milan, Italy) had been used as an intravenous contrast agent. Exclusion criteria for this radiologic study comprised of lymphadenopathy or lymph node dissection in the CTA report, insufficient image quality, presence of tumor, or metastatic disease or unclear origin of the submental artery.
In total 52 CTA scans (n = 23 male, n = 29 female) of satisfactory imaging quality were included to assess 100 sides (n = 48 bilateral, n = 4 unilateral) for lymph node anatomical features. The mean age of the group was 61.77 ± 13.78 years. The mean body mass index was 26.68 ± 4.86 kg/m2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Lower Limb CT Angiography Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patient installation was often difficult because of deformities and sometimes required use of cushions. Tourniquets were placed around thighs and calves in order to obtain better opacification of the main vessels rather than superficial vessels.
CT was performed with a scanner (SOMATOM Definition AS, Siemens Healthineers) after a biphasic iodinated solution injection (iomeprol, Iomeron® 400 mg/ml, Bracco Imaging) including a first injection of 120 ml at the rate of 1.5 ml/s immediately followed by a second injection of 80 ml at the rate of 3 ml/s. CT acquisition was performed with a collimation of 128 × 0.625 mm and was triggered 135 s after the start of injection. Voltage was 120 kV and amperage 300 mAs/slice. Rotation time was 0.5 s/rotation.
Multiplanar reconstructions were performed as well as bone and vessels volume rendering 3D images.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Abdominal Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The computed tomography (CT) protocol included a triple-phase scan: unenhanced, arterial, and venous, with the arterial and venous phases being 15 and 90 seconds after intravenous contrast injection, respectively (100cc Iomeron, Bracco, Milan, Italy). The technical parameters are: reference kV: 120, reference mAs: 180, rotation time: 0.5 s, pitch: 0.6, collimation: 128 × 0.6, slice thickness: 1 mm & 5 mm, slice increment: 0.5 mm & 5 mm and a soft tissue kernel.
The MRI protocol consists of a T2 haste coronal and transverse, T1 Dixon transverse in-opp bh 320, T1 vibe FS coronal and transverse, ep2 d diffusion, and post-contrast series transverse and coronal (T1 vibe in the corticomedullary phase, nephrogenic phase and the excretory phase) after intravenous injection of Gadoteric acid (Dotarem, Guerbet, Villepinte, France); the injected amount of contrast medium depends on the weight of the patient.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!