The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using anti foxo3

1

Localizing CHIT1, TGFBRAP1, and FOXO3 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To localize the expression of CHIT1, TGFBRAP1, and FOXO3, double-label IHC was undertaken with a modification of procedures described previously by our laboratory (Lee et al, 2016 (link)). NHLF cells (1 × 106 cells/well) were cultured overnight in four-well chamber slides (Falcon) at 37°C in 5% CO2 incubator, then washed with PBS. To unmask antigens, the slides were placed for 20 min at high temperature under high pressure in citrate buffer (10 mM sodium citrate, 0.05% Tween 20, pH 6). The slides were then blocked with a nonserum protein-blocking reagent (DakoCytomation Inc) for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with primary antibodies (anti-CHIT1 [1/50 dilution, AF-5325; R&D system], anti-TGFBRAP1 [1/50 dilution, SC-13134; Santa Cruz Biotechnology], and anti-FOXO3 [1/50 dilution, 12829S; Cell Signaling]) for 60 min at room temperature in a humid chamber. Substitution of the primary antibody with PBS served as a negative control. The slides were then washed in PBST (0.01% Tween 20) and incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Cell Signaling). Reaction products were developed using DAB containing 0.3% hydrogen peroxide up to 5 min. Cell nuclei were stained with mounting medium with DAPI (50 μl, H-1200; Vector Laboratories). Fluorescence was detected by Immunofluorescence microscopy.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

FoxO3 ChIP Assay in Skeletal Muscle

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ChIP assay was performed as previously described33 (link), in BVES-KO skeletal muscles using the Magna ChIP A/G Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Kit (17-10085, Sigma-Aldrich). Soluble chromatin was co-immunoprecipitated with rabbit polyclonal anti-FoxO3 (1:200, #2497, Cell Signaling Technology) or an equal amount of control rabbit IgG (#2729, Cell Signaling Technology). After decrosslinking of the DNA, samples were subjected to quantitative PCR. The oligonucleotide primers used are shown in Supplementary Data 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunostaining of Cochlear Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After fixation, cochlear samples were blocked with 10% normal donkey serum in 10 mM phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) with 0.3% Triton X-100 for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4 °C. The next day, the tissues were incubated for 2 h at 4 °C with 488- or 594-conjugated donkey secondary antibody (Invitrogen) and DAPI (Sigma-Aldrich). Omission of primary antibody served as the negative control. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-β-catenin (BD Biosciences), anti-myosin VIIA (Myosin7a) (Proteus Biosciences, Ramona, CA, USA), anti-cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Foxo3 (Cell Signaling Technology), anti-Parvalbumin (Sigma-Aldrich), TUNEL (Roche, Indianapolis, IN, USA), and MitoSOX Red (Life Technologies, Rockford, IL, USA). Cochleae were dissected into apical, middle, and basal turns, and images were taken using a Leica SP5 confocal fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems, Biberach, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Expression Analysis in Drug-Treated Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were harvested after the prescribed time of drug treatment to extract total protein. The protein concentration was measured using a BCA assay kit and aligned with the lysate. After separating the proteins using sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), the proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane. Subsequently, after exposure to confining liquid at room temperature for 2 h, the PVDF membranes were incubated overnight at 4 ˚C with different primary antibodies, including anti-GADPH, anti-PI3 Kinase p85 alpha Antibody, AKT1/2/3, anti-Phospho-PI3-kinase p85- alpha/ gamma, anti-p-Akt(Ser473), anti-mTOR, anti-p-mTOR, anti-ATG5, anti-Beclin-1, anti-Xct/SLC7A11, anti-GPX4, anti-NRF2, anti-IL-18, anti-GSDMD, anti-Caspase-1 as well as anti-NALRP3, all of which were purchased from Abmart (Shanghai, China). anti-LC3B, anti-P62, and anti-FOXO3 were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA). On another day, those unbound primary antibodies were eluted with PBST and incubated with the IgG goat anti-rabbit/ mouse IgG for 1 h. After being washed with PBST again, the bands were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (luminous liquid brand) (Tanon 5200, China) and quantified with ImageJ software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Protein Expression Analysis by Western Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein was extracted from whole cells and 20 μg isolated protein was separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and electroblotted onto a polyvinylidene fluoride membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). The membrane was probed with anti-SOX9 (56KD) mouse monoclonal antibody (1:500; #ab76997, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-p-Akt(#4056), anti-Akt(#9272), anti-p21(#2947), anti-p27(#3686), anti-CyclinD1(#2922), anti-p-FOXO1(#9461), anti-FOXO1(#9454), anti-p-FOXO3(#9465) or anti-FOXO3(#2472) (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA). The membranes were then stripped and reprobed with an anti–α-tubulin mouse monoclonal antibody (1:1000; #2125; Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA) as the loading control. Bound antibodies were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Dübendorf, Switzerland).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

AZD1480 Cytotoxicity Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AZD1480 was from MedChemExpress (Monmouth Junction, NJ, USA) and was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA). The stock solution (40 mM) was stored at −20 °C. The 35~40% formaldehyde and Triton X-100 were from Sigma. Muse Cell Analyzer was from Merck Millipore (Billerica, MA, USA). FlowJo software to analyze raw data from Muse Cell Analyzer was from FlowJo LCC (version 10.5.3, Ashland, OR, USA). Primary antibodies in this study were as follows: anti-β-actin, anti-GAPDH, anti-Lamin A/C, anti-IL4Rα, and anti-IL13Rα1 were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, and anti-cleaved PARP-1, anti-cleaved caspase-3, anti-FOXO3, anti-p27, anti-Bax, anti-Bcl-2, anti-JAK2, and anti-pJAK2 were from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated anti-rabbit and anti-mouse secondary antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunoblot Analysis of Protein Targets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblots were carried out as previously described (25 (link)). A total of 20 μg of protein extracts from each sample were denatured in 4× Laemmli sample buffer (Biorad, 161–0747) and loaded into a Sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel for immunoblot analysis. Immunoblots were performed using anti-ACTB (Sigma, A2066), anti-HSF1 (Cell Signaling, 4356), anti-MYC Tag (Cell Signaling, 2278), anti-HSPA1A (Cell Signaling, 4872) and anti-FOXO3 (Cell Signaling, 2497). Immunoblots were developed with the ECL-plus chemiluminescence reagent (GE Healthcare, RPN2232) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

ChIP Assay for PCSK9 Promoter Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells cultured in MEM medium were treated with vehicle or 7030B-C5 (12.5 μM) for 24 h. The ChIP assay was carried out using the ChIP Assay Kit (Cell Signaling Technology) according to the manufacturer's instructions. After 7030B-C5 treating, the cells were fixed in 1% formaldehyde for 10 min at room temperature. The chromatin was sheared to an average length of 150–900 bp by sonication. The chromatin extracts were immunoprecipitated at 4 °C overnight with anti-HNF1α, anti-FoxO3, or control IgG (Cell Signaling Technology). Immunocomplexes were isolated by binding to protein A-agarose beads. Precipitated DNA was isolated after ethanol precipitation. Quantitative real-time PCR was performed to analyze the promoter binding levels determined using the specific PCSK9 primers 5′-TCCAGCCCAGTTAGGATTTG-3′ and 5′-CGGAAACCTTCTAGGGTGTG-3′.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

FOXO3 Binding to LOC554202 Promoter

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EZ-Magna ChIP kit (Millipore, Pudong, Shanghai, China) was adopted in the ChIP assays for exploring the FOXO3 binding to the endogenous LOC554202 promoter. In brief, GC cells were cross-linked in 1% formaldehyde solution for 10 min at room temperature, followed by the addition of 130 mM of glycine for 8 min. Sonication helped to generate DNA fragments in the range of 200–300 bp. Antibodies of anti-FOXO3 (#9342, Cell Signaling Technology, Haidian, Beijing, China) and IgG were employed for each immunoprecipitation. The qRT-PCR analysis was conducted on input DNAs after immunoprecipitation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Western Blot Protein Analysis of Muscle Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were homogenized in lysis buffer (50‐mM tris, pH 7.5, 150‐mM NaCl, 0.5% NP‐40) supplemented withprotease inhibitor cocktail (MedChemExpress [MCE], HY‐K0010), followed by SDS‐PAGE and electrotransferred to 0.45‐μm polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore). Membranes were blocked with 5% non‐fat dry milk in tris‐buffered saline with Tween 20 (TBST) for 1 h and then incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation with proper secondary antibodies. Antibodies were used at the following concentrations: anti‐DBC1 (1:2000, Bethyl, A300434A), anti‐myogenin (MyoG) (1:500, Santa Cruz, sc‐52903), anti‐myosin heavy chain (MHC) (1:1000, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank [DSHB], MF20‐C), anti‐FOXO3 (1:2000, Cell Signaling Technology [CST], 2497S), anti‐Atrogin1 (1:500, Santa Cruz, sc‐16806), anti‐Murf1 (1:500, Santa Cruz, sc‐398608), anti‐LC3 (1:500, ABclonal, A19665), anti‐MDM2 (1:500, Santa Cruz, sc‐13161), anti‐ubiquitin (1:500, Santa Cruz, sc‐8017), anti‐β‐tubulin (1:5000, CMCTAG, AT0003) and anti‐GAPDH (1:5000, Millipore, mab374). Blotting signals were visualized on Azure 200 Gel Imager (Azure Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!